4CPS-378 Oral therapy adherence and satisfaction in patients with multiple myeloma

M. Solano, C. Faure, C. Pain, P. Loriod, A. Maes, P. Marguet, M. Kroemer, A. Rumpler, É. Daguindau, S. Limat, A. Clairet
{"title":"4CPS-378 Oral therapy adherence and satisfaction in patients with multiple myeloma","authors":"M. Solano, C. Faure, C. Pain, P. Loriod, A. Maes, P. Marguet, M. Kroemer, A. Rumpler, É. Daguindau, S. Limat, A. Clairet","doi":"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and importance The transition to oral therapies in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) offers potential benefits to patients, however they must self-manage their medications and adherence can become an issue. It has been shown that patient satisfaction with medication has a strong positive correlation with adherence in chronic diseases. To date, there is no standard method of measuring adherence. Aim and objectives The aim of this study was to estimate the adherence rate of oral antimyeloma therapies using two indirect methods and to identify risk factors for medication non-adherence. A secondary aim was to explore patients’ and caregivers’ perceptions of their medications. Material and methods We carried out a cross sectional, observational, prospective, multicentre survey based on a self-reported questionnaire. All consecutive MM patients, with at least 3 months of oral therapy prescriptions were included. The structured and validated 6 item Girerd Scale and the medication possession ratio (MPR) were used for measuring medication adherence, and the SATMED-Q questionnaire was used for measuring patient satisfaction with the medication. An analysis of risk factors for non-adherence to oral therapy was performed using univariate analysis. Patients’ and caregivers’ opinions about their medications were assessed with a score from 0 (no importance) to 10 (highest importance). Results 101 of 116 analysed patients participated in the survey, giving a response rate of 87%. The prevalence of adherence to oral antimyeloma therapy was estimated at 51.5% using the questionnaire, corresponding to a high level of adherence (ie, score=6). According to the MPR, adherence was evaluated at 96%, which was also considered high (ie, MPR ≥0.80). With both methods combined, adherence was estimated at 50.5%. One risk factor for non-adherence to oral antimyeloma therapy was identified: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) >2 (p value=0.007). One predictive factor for good adherence to oral antimyeloma therapy was also identified: high satisfaction with treatment (p=0.01). No statistically significant difference was observed between patients and caregivers’ perceptions of their medications. Conclusion and relevance Determining risk factors that influence adherence could be helpful to better identify patients at a higher risk for non-adherence, to personalise therapeutic information and education, and to improve the quality of healthcare overall. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest","PeriodicalId":11998,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and importance The transition to oral therapies in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) offers potential benefits to patients, however they must self-manage their medications and adherence can become an issue. It has been shown that patient satisfaction with medication has a strong positive correlation with adherence in chronic diseases. To date, there is no standard method of measuring adherence. Aim and objectives The aim of this study was to estimate the adherence rate of oral antimyeloma therapies using two indirect methods and to identify risk factors for medication non-adherence. A secondary aim was to explore patients’ and caregivers’ perceptions of their medications. Material and methods We carried out a cross sectional, observational, prospective, multicentre survey based on a self-reported questionnaire. All consecutive MM patients, with at least 3 months of oral therapy prescriptions were included. The structured and validated 6 item Girerd Scale and the medication possession ratio (MPR) were used for measuring medication adherence, and the SATMED-Q questionnaire was used for measuring patient satisfaction with the medication. An analysis of risk factors for non-adherence to oral therapy was performed using univariate analysis. Patients’ and caregivers’ opinions about their medications were assessed with a score from 0 (no importance) to 10 (highest importance). Results 101 of 116 analysed patients participated in the survey, giving a response rate of 87%. The prevalence of adherence to oral antimyeloma therapy was estimated at 51.5% using the questionnaire, corresponding to a high level of adherence (ie, score=6). According to the MPR, adherence was evaluated at 96%, which was also considered high (ie, MPR ≥0.80). With both methods combined, adherence was estimated at 50.5%. One risk factor for non-adherence to oral antimyeloma therapy was identified: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) >2 (p value=0.007). One predictive factor for good adherence to oral antimyeloma therapy was also identified: high satisfaction with treatment (p=0.01). No statistically significant difference was observed between patients and caregivers’ perceptions of their medications. Conclusion and relevance Determining risk factors that influence adherence could be helpful to better identify patients at a higher risk for non-adherence, to personalise therapeutic information and education, and to improve the quality of healthcare overall. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest
多发性骨髓瘤患者口服治疗的依从性和满意度
背景和重要性多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者向口服治疗的过渡为患者提供了潜在的益处,然而他们必须自我管理他们的药物和依从性可能成为一个问题。研究表明,慢性疾病患者对药物的满意度与依从性有很强的正相关。到目前为止,还没有衡量依从性的标准方法。目的和目的本研究的目的是使用两种间接方法估计口服抗骨髓瘤治疗的依从率,并确定药物不依从性的危险因素。第二个目的是探索患者和护理人员对他们的药物的看法。材料和方法我们采用了一项基于自述问卷的横断面、观察性、前瞻性、多中心调查。所有连续接受至少3个月口服治疗处方的MM患者被纳入研究。采用结构化且经过验证的6项Girerd量表和药物占有率(MPR)测量用药依从性,采用SATMED-Q问卷测量患者用药满意度。采用单变量分析对不坚持口服治疗的危险因素进行分析。患者和护理人员对其药物的看法以0分(不重要)到10分(最重要)进行评估。结果116例患者中有101例参与调查,有效率为87%。根据调查问卷,口服抗骨髓瘤治疗的依从性估计为51.5%,对应于高水平的依从性(即得分=6)。根据MPR,依从性评估为96%,也被认为是高依从性(即MPR≥0.80)。两种方法相结合,依从性估计为50.5%。发现不坚持口服抗骨髓瘤治疗的一个危险因素:东部合作肿瘤组绩效状态(ECOG-PS) >2 (p值=0.007)。对口服抗骨髓瘤治疗的良好依从性的一个预测因素也被确定:对治疗的高满意度(p=0.01)。患者和护理人员对药物的认知没有统计学上的显著差异。结论和相关性确定影响依从性的危险因素有助于更好地识别不依从性风险较高的患者,个性化治疗信息和教育,并提高整体医疗保健质量。参考文献和/或致谢利益冲突无利益冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信