Home vs. School Deworming and Meal Programs: Evidence from Rural Senegal

Théophile T. Azomahou, F. Diallo
{"title":"Home vs. School Deworming and Meal Programs: Evidence from Rural Senegal","authors":"Théophile T. Azomahou, F. Diallo","doi":"10.5325/jafrideve.18.1.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study uses primary data to assess the impact of deworming and school feeding programs on pupil's educational outcomes measured by test scores. In particular we elaborate on deworming at home vs. school. Relying on Propensity Score Matching and selection models we find that meals program significantly increase pupils' test scores. The impact is more important for pupils who are in schools having association of mothers. Deworming at school has a positive effect on pupils’ performance while deworming at home has a negative impact. This result indicates that the use of widely spread traditional deworming medicines should be discouraged. Among the determinants of test scores, class size displays a U-shaped relation pointing to the crucial role of group effect in shaping pupils' knowledge. The impact of programs does vary depending on the gender of pupils. Policy analysis including cost-effectiveness is also provided.","PeriodicalId":81652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eastern African research & development","volume":"187 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eastern African research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jafrideve.18.1.0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study uses primary data to assess the impact of deworming and school feeding programs on pupil's educational outcomes measured by test scores. In particular we elaborate on deworming at home vs. school. Relying on Propensity Score Matching and selection models we find that meals program significantly increase pupils' test scores. The impact is more important for pupils who are in schools having association of mothers. Deworming at school has a positive effect on pupils’ performance while deworming at home has a negative impact. This result indicates that the use of widely spread traditional deworming medicines should be discouraged. Among the determinants of test scores, class size displays a U-shaped relation pointing to the crucial role of group effect in shaping pupils' knowledge. The impact of programs does vary depending on the gender of pupils. Policy analysis including cost-effectiveness is also provided.
家庭与学校驱虫和膳食计划:来自塞内加尔农村的证据
本研究使用原始数据来评估驱虫和学校供餐计划对学生考试成绩的影响。我们特别阐述了在家里和学校的驱虫。根据倾向得分匹配和选择模型,我们发现膳食计划显著提高了学生的考试成绩。这种影响对于那些在有母亲的学校里的学生来说更为重要。在学校驱虫对学生的表现有积极影响,而在家里驱虫则有消极影响。这一结果表明,应不鼓励使用广泛使用的传统驱虫药物。在考试成绩的决定因素中,班级规模呈u型关系,这表明群体效应在塑造学生知识方面起着至关重要的作用。项目的影响确实因学生的性别而异。还提供了包括成本效益在内的政策分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书