Vaccine Protection Efficiency Compared with the Smart Application of Common-Sense Pandemic Control Measures

L. Popa-Simil
{"title":"Vaccine Protection Efficiency Compared with the Smart Application of Common-Sense Pandemic Control Measures","authors":"L. Popa-Simil","doi":"10.37871/jbres1317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most recent NIH studies and CDC publication were able to estimate the vaccine efficacy variation overtime, and to remove the previous vail of ultimate and absolute protection against SARS-CoV-2, known as COVID-19 with respect to delta variant, propagated in the USA. The statistical data shows clear that Vaccines as Pfizer ad Moderna works, in spite their efficacies are decreasing with about 5%/month, are still able to protect in a more complex manner than masks and nano-engineered aerodynamics based protection measures. If these measures are referring to preventing inhalation of any hazardous material, no matter the type of viruses, the vaccine is dealing with the effects of virus inside the body after the intake took place. These vaccines were considered an ultimate protection and praised as such, as being in fact big pharma business, easy to be understood by masses with a real nature hazard mitigation IQ level much lower than the one made at national level based on the actual IQ tests customized to keep happy Caucasians, but fit well on Pacific Rim Asians. The problem with engineered protection is that one needs a smart population, cooperating synergistically, and be knowledgeable on when and how to use the protection in order to stop pandemic, insulate aggressor virus, create a vaccine and terminate the hazard. The current US practice is dominated by high-level mis-information and politicization of pandemic, where the actual spike in delta variant is due to CDC suppression of masks, without reaching a heard immunity, praising and enforcing vaccination aggravated by the incompetence of conservatives, who do not understand that a sick or dead person cannot enjoy constitutional freedoms, and do not distinguish between a life threat and a right, simply opposing to government without coming with alternate measures, having a disastrous effect on US population which with only 4% of world’s population delivered more than 25% of world’s causalities. The current milestone of 610,000 deaths and 40 million infected made the world leery about US exceptionalism and its planetary leadership.","PeriodicalId":94067,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical research & environmental sciences","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical research & environmental sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37871/jbres1317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most recent NIH studies and CDC publication were able to estimate the vaccine efficacy variation overtime, and to remove the previous vail of ultimate and absolute protection against SARS-CoV-2, known as COVID-19 with respect to delta variant, propagated in the USA. The statistical data shows clear that Vaccines as Pfizer ad Moderna works, in spite their efficacies are decreasing with about 5%/month, are still able to protect in a more complex manner than masks and nano-engineered aerodynamics based protection measures. If these measures are referring to preventing inhalation of any hazardous material, no matter the type of viruses, the vaccine is dealing with the effects of virus inside the body after the intake took place. These vaccines were considered an ultimate protection and praised as such, as being in fact big pharma business, easy to be understood by masses with a real nature hazard mitigation IQ level much lower than the one made at national level based on the actual IQ tests customized to keep happy Caucasians, but fit well on Pacific Rim Asians. The problem with engineered protection is that one needs a smart population, cooperating synergistically, and be knowledgeable on when and how to use the protection in order to stop pandemic, insulate aggressor virus, create a vaccine and terminate the hazard. The current US practice is dominated by high-level mis-information and politicization of pandemic, where the actual spike in delta variant is due to CDC suppression of masks, without reaching a heard immunity, praising and enforcing vaccination aggravated by the incompetence of conservatives, who do not understand that a sick or dead person cannot enjoy constitutional freedoms, and do not distinguish between a life threat and a right, simply opposing to government without coming with alternate measures, having a disastrous effect on US population which with only 4% of world’s population delivered more than 25% of world’s causalities. The current milestone of 610,000 deaths and 40 million infected made the world leery about US exceptionalism and its planetary leadership.
疫苗防护效果与常识性疫情防控措施的智能应用比较
美国国立卫生研究院最近的研究和美国疾病控制与预防中心的出版物都能够估计出疫苗效力随时间推移的变化,并消除了之前在美国传播的最终和绝对保护SARS-CoV-2(即delta变体的COVID-19)的面纱。统计数据清楚地表明,辉瑞和Moderna的疫苗有效,尽管其效力每月下降约5%,但仍然能够以比口罩和纳米工程空气动力学保护措施更复杂的方式进行保护。如果这些措施是指防止吸入任何有害物质,无论病毒类型如何,疫苗都是针对病毒在摄入后在体内产生的影响。这些疫苗被认为是一种终极保护,并受到称赞,因为实际上是大型制药企业,易于被大众理解,真正的自然灾害缓解智商水平远低于国家一级的智商水平,这些智商水平是根据实际的智商测试定制的,以保持高加索人的快乐,但适合环太平洋地区的亚洲人。工程保护的问题在于,人们需要一个聪明的群体,协同合作,了解何时以及如何使用保护措施,以阻止大流行,隔离入侵病毒,制造疫苗并终止危害。目前美国的做法被高层错误信息和大流行政治化所主导,其中三角洲变体的实际峰值是由于疾病预防控制中心压制口罩,没有达到既定的免疫,赞扬和强制接种疫苗,而保守派的无能则加剧了这一点,他们不理解病人或死者不能享受宪法自由,也不区分生命威胁和权利。仅仅是反对政府,而没有提出替代措施,这对美国人口造成了灾难性的影响,而美国人口只占世界人口的4%,却造成了世界上25%以上的伤亡。目前的里程碑是61万人死亡,4000万人感染,这让世界对美国的例外论及其全球领导地位产生了怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信