Revisiting the relevance of strategic management accounting research

Q1 Social Sciences
M. Rashid, Mohobbot Ali, Dewan Mahboob Hossain
{"title":"Revisiting the relevance of strategic management accounting research","authors":"M. Rashid, Mohobbot Ali, Dewan Mahboob Hossain","doi":"10.1108/prr-11-2019-0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to present a review of the literature on strategic management accounting (SMA). Specifically, it focuses on the trend of SMA research since the publication of Langfield-Smith’s (2008) influential paper “Strategic management accounting: how far have we come in 25 years?” which raised the question of relevance of further SMA research.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study reviewed articles published on SMA as a whole (comprising a set of advanced management accounting techniques) and its specific techniques for the period of 2008 to 2019 in 23 leading accounting journals.\n\n\nFindings\nThe review finds that research on SMA has focused on the contingencies influencing the adoption and implementation of SMA techniques and the effects of such adoption on various aspects of firm and employee performance. The renovation and modification of existing practices in attempt to match with the organizational context has also attracted the attention of several SMA scholars. In addition, a noticeable shift to the strategic management theory and case study method was observed during the study period.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study focuses on the trend of SMA research in an attempt to revisit the relevance of further research in this arena, particularly as a response to the criticism raised by Langfield-Smith (2008).\n","PeriodicalId":32387,"journal":{"name":"PSU Research Review","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSU Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/prr-11-2019-0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to present a review of the literature on strategic management accounting (SMA). Specifically, it focuses on the trend of SMA research since the publication of Langfield-Smith’s (2008) influential paper “Strategic management accounting: how far have we come in 25 years?” which raised the question of relevance of further SMA research. Design/methodology/approach The study reviewed articles published on SMA as a whole (comprising a set of advanced management accounting techniques) and its specific techniques for the period of 2008 to 2019 in 23 leading accounting journals. Findings The review finds that research on SMA has focused on the contingencies influencing the adoption and implementation of SMA techniques and the effects of such adoption on various aspects of firm and employee performance. The renovation and modification of existing practices in attempt to match with the organizational context has also attracted the attention of several SMA scholars. In addition, a noticeable shift to the strategic management theory and case study method was observed during the study period. Originality/value The study focuses on the trend of SMA research in an attempt to revisit the relevance of further research in this arena, particularly as a response to the criticism raised by Langfield-Smith (2008).
重新审视战略管理会计研究的相关性
本研究的目的是对战略管理会计(SMA)的文献进行回顾。具体而言,它侧重于自Langfield-Smith(2008)有影响力的论文“战略管理会计:25年来我们走了多远?”发表以来SMA研究的趋势?这就提出了进一步SMA研究的相关性问题。设计/方法/方法该研究回顾了2008年至2019年期间在23个主要会计期刊上发表的关于SMA的文章(包括一套先进的管理会计技术)及其具体技术。研究结果回顾发现,对SMA的研究主要集中在影响SMA技术的采用和实施的偶然事件,以及这种采用对公司和员工绩效的各个方面的影响。试图与组织情境相匹配的现有实践的更新和修改也引起了一些SMA学者的注意。此外,在研究期间,观察到战略管理理论和案例研究方法的明显转变。原创性/价值本研究关注SMA研究的趋势,试图重新审视这一领域进一步研究的相关性,特别是作为对Langfield-Smith(2008)提出的批评的回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信