El uso de la corifolitropina alfa en donantes de óvulos obtiene la misma eficiencia reproductiva y efectividad que la FSH recombinante, con una mayor comodidad para la donante

Carmen Calatayud, Paula Ferrer, Mónica Muñoz, Martín Díaz, Javier Blanes
{"title":"El uso de la corifolitropina alfa en donantes de óvulos obtiene la misma eficiencia reproductiva y efectividad que la FSH recombinante, con una mayor comodidad para la donante","authors":"Carmen Calatayud,&nbsp;Paula Ferrer,&nbsp;Mónica Muñoz,&nbsp;Martín Díaz,&nbsp;Javier Blanes","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2017.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Conventional ovarian stimulation with daily injections of FSH for oocyte donors, besides the discomfort of the medication, involves a great demand of time. Treatments need to be simplified without losing effectiveness and safety. Corifollitropin alpha (Elonva) enables the first 7<!--> <!-->injections of FSH to be replaced with one single injection.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare the effectiveness and convenience of corifollitropin alpha (Elonva) compared to daily recombinant FSH (rFSH) in the ovarian stimulation of oocyte donors.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>An analysis was performed on 90 cycles of Elonva and 96 cycles of rFSH. The statistical analysis included the Student <em>t</em>-test for means and the chi-squared test for percentages. Effectiveness has been evaluated through reproductive effectiveness defined as the total number of live births in relation to the total number of mature eggs. An analysis was also performed on variables, such as number of mature oocytes, percentage of viable embryos, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer. Comfort has been evaluated by the number of visits to the clinic for medication administration.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Significant differences were only found in the number of injections administered to donors (3.20 Elonva vs. 8.55 rFSH, <em>P</em>&lt;.005). Reproductive effectiveness was 5.61 vs. 5.49, with implantation rate 44.44 vs. 44.34, and clinical pregnancy 56.25 vs. 58.73. There no significant differences in any of variables analysed, including the mean cost. No cases of OHSS or adverse drug reactions were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The use of corifollitropin alpha in oocyte donors offers the same reproductive effectiveness and is more convenient for the donor compared to stimulation with daily rFSH.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 17-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.medre.2017.01.003","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S234093201730004X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction

Conventional ovarian stimulation with daily injections of FSH for oocyte donors, besides the discomfort of the medication, involves a great demand of time. Treatments need to be simplified without losing effectiveness and safety. Corifollitropin alpha (Elonva) enables the first 7 injections of FSH to be replaced with one single injection.

Objective

To compare the effectiveness and convenience of corifollitropin alpha (Elonva) compared to daily recombinant FSH (rFSH) in the ovarian stimulation of oocyte donors.

Materials and methods

An analysis was performed on 90 cycles of Elonva and 96 cycles of rFSH. The statistical analysis included the Student t-test for means and the chi-squared test for percentages. Effectiveness has been evaluated through reproductive effectiveness defined as the total number of live births in relation to the total number of mature eggs. An analysis was also performed on variables, such as number of mature oocytes, percentage of viable embryos, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer. Comfort has been evaluated by the number of visits to the clinic for medication administration.

Results

Significant differences were only found in the number of injections administered to donors (3.20 Elonva vs. 8.55 rFSH, P<.005). Reproductive effectiveness was 5.61 vs. 5.49, with implantation rate 44.44 vs. 44.34, and clinical pregnancy 56.25 vs. 58.73. There no significant differences in any of variables analysed, including the mean cost. No cases of OHSS or adverse drug reactions were observed.

Conclusions

The use of corifollitropin alpha in oocyte donors offers the same reproductive effectiveness and is more convenient for the donor compared to stimulation with daily rFSH.

在供体卵细胞中使用促卵泡激素可获得与重组卵泡刺激素相同的生殖效率和有效性,对供体更方便
对卵母细胞供者每日注射促卵泡刺激素的常规卵巢刺激,除了药物的不适外,还需要大量的时间。需要在不失去有效性和安全性的情况下简化治疗方法。Corifollitropin α (Elonva)使前7次FSH注射可以用一次注射代替。目的比较corifolitropin α (Elonva)与每日重组卵泡刺激素(rFSH)在卵母细胞供者卵巢刺激中的有效性和便利性。材料与方法对90个Elonva循环和96个rFSH循环进行分析。统计分析包括均值的学生t检验和百分比的卡方检验。有效性是通过生殖效率来评估的,生殖效率的定义是活产总数与成熟卵子总数的关系。对成熟卵母细胞数、存活胚胎百分比、着床率、临床妊娠率等变量进行了分析。舒适度是通过到诊所服药的次数来评估的。结果两组仅在供体注射次数上存在显著差异(Elonva 3.20 vs. rFSH 8.55, P< 005)。生殖效能为5.61比5.49,着床率为44.44比44.34,临床妊娠率为56.25比58.73。包括平均成本在内的所有分析变量均无显著差异。无OHSS病例及药物不良反应。结论在卵母细胞供体中使用corifollitoppin α与每日使用rFSH刺激相比,具有相同的生殖效果,且更方便。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信