Raman Spectroscopy is Sensitive to Biochemical Changes Related to Various Cartilage Injuries

R. Shaikh, E. Nippolainen, V. Virtanen, J. Torniainen, L. Rieppo, S. Saarakkala, I. Afara, J. Töyräs
{"title":"Raman Spectroscopy is Sensitive to Biochemical Changes Related to Various Cartilage Injuries","authors":"R. Shaikh, E. Nippolainen, V. Virtanen, J. Torniainen, L. Rieppo, S. Saarakkala, I. Afara, J. Töyräs","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3606831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, Raman spectroscopy has evolved as a promising in vivo tool in various biomedical applications. It has also shown potential for scoring the lesion severity of joint cartilage, which could be useful in determining the best treatment strategy during cartilage arthroscopic repair surgery. However, the effect of different cartilage injury types on Raman spectra is unknown. The study aims to show the potential of Raman spectroscopy to detect different cartilage injury types that mimic physiologically relevant damages. Different types of injuries were induced using established mechanical and enzymatic approaches. The mechanical damage—was induced through surface abrasion (ABR) (n = 12) or impact loading (IMP) (n = 12). Enzymatic damage—was induced using three different treatments: 30 minutes trypsin digestion (T-30)(n = 12), 90 minutes collagenase digestion (C-90)(n = 12), and 24 hours collagenase digestion (C-24)(n = 12). Raman spectra were obtained from all the specimens, and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was applied to distinguish cartilage injury types from their respective controls. The PLS-DA cross-validation accuracies were higher for C-24 (88%) and IMP (79%) than for C-90 (67%), T-30 (63%), and ABR (58%) groups. This study indicates that Raman spectroscopy, combined with multivariate analysis, can identify different cartilage injury types.","PeriodicalId":8928,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterials eJournal","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterials eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3606831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In recent years, Raman spectroscopy has evolved as a promising in vivo tool in various biomedical applications. It has also shown potential for scoring the lesion severity of joint cartilage, which could be useful in determining the best treatment strategy during cartilage arthroscopic repair surgery. However, the effect of different cartilage injury types on Raman spectra is unknown. The study aims to show the potential of Raman spectroscopy to detect different cartilage injury types that mimic physiologically relevant damages. Different types of injuries were induced using established mechanical and enzymatic approaches. The mechanical damage—was induced through surface abrasion (ABR) (n = 12) or impact loading (IMP) (n = 12). Enzymatic damage—was induced using three different treatments: 30 minutes trypsin digestion (T-30)(n = 12), 90 minutes collagenase digestion (C-90)(n = 12), and 24 hours collagenase digestion (C-24)(n = 12). Raman spectra were obtained from all the specimens, and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was applied to distinguish cartilage injury types from their respective controls. The PLS-DA cross-validation accuracies were higher for C-24 (88%) and IMP (79%) than for C-90 (67%), T-30 (63%), and ABR (58%) groups. This study indicates that Raman spectroscopy, combined with multivariate analysis, can identify different cartilage injury types.
拉曼光谱对各种软骨损伤相关的生化变化敏感
近年来,拉曼光谱已经发展成为一种有前途的体内工具,在各种生物医学应用。它还显示了对关节软骨损伤严重程度评分的潜力,这可能有助于确定软骨关节镜修复手术期间的最佳治疗策略。然而,不同软骨损伤类型对拉曼光谱的影响尚不清楚。该研究旨在展示拉曼光谱的潜力,以检测不同的软骨损伤类型,模拟生理相关损伤。采用已建立的机械和酶的方法诱导不同类型的损伤。机械损伤是通过表面磨损(ABR) (n = 12)或冲击载荷(IMP) (n = 12)引起的。采用三种不同的处理方法诱导酶损伤:30分钟胰蛋白酶消化(T-30)(n = 12), 90分钟胶原酶消化(C-90)(n = 12)和24小时胶原酶消化(C-24)(n = 12)。从所有标本中获得拉曼光谱,并应用偏最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA)区分软骨损伤类型与各自的对照。C-24(88%)和IMP(79%)的PLS-DA交叉验证准确性高于C-90(67%)、T-30(63%)和ABR(58%)组。本研究表明,结合多变量分析,拉曼光谱可以识别不同的软骨损伤类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信