Role of addition of chemotherapy to palliative radiotherapy protocol: A review of literature and experience from a tertiary cancer center of India

P. Venkata Ramana, Gulafshan Jabi, Mohsin Khan
{"title":"Role of addition of chemotherapy to palliative radiotherapy protocol: A review of literature and experience from a tertiary cancer center of India","authors":"P. Venkata Ramana, Gulafshan Jabi, Mohsin Khan","doi":"10.4103/jrcr.jrcr_31_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unresectable head-and-neck cancers (HNCs) pose a significant challenge to clinical oncologists. Radiotherapy (RT) has a pivotal role in palliation of symptoms in advanced unresectable stage. Palliative RT protocols generally employ hypofractionated regimes in an attempt to reduce the overall treatment time and acute toxicities. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) may improve local control facilitating faster palliation of symptoms. Yet the role of chemotherapy with hypofractionated schedules is unclear in palliative settings due to the fear of increased toxicities. The literature review was hence conducted to validate the tolerability and efficacy of CCRT in the palliative setting. The literature search was performed on electronic databases using appropriate keywords. Studies evaluating untreated patients, treated recurrent cancers, second primaries localized in the head and neck or metastatic HNC were all chosen. Five studies were selected which met our selection criteria. Palliation of symptoms, response rates, and toxicities of these studies was evaluated. Role of such concurrent regimes at other sites have also been discussed. All the evaluated studies demonstrated good rates of symptom palliation and response rates with tolerable adverse effects. In addition, our literature review has identified a paucity of evidence that warrants large-scale longitudinal studies to derive conclusive remarks on the use of palliative CCRT.","PeriodicalId":16923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation and Cancer Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation and Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrcr.jrcr_31_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unresectable head-and-neck cancers (HNCs) pose a significant challenge to clinical oncologists. Radiotherapy (RT) has a pivotal role in palliation of symptoms in advanced unresectable stage. Palliative RT protocols generally employ hypofractionated regimes in an attempt to reduce the overall treatment time and acute toxicities. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) may improve local control facilitating faster palliation of symptoms. Yet the role of chemotherapy with hypofractionated schedules is unclear in palliative settings due to the fear of increased toxicities. The literature review was hence conducted to validate the tolerability and efficacy of CCRT in the palliative setting. The literature search was performed on electronic databases using appropriate keywords. Studies evaluating untreated patients, treated recurrent cancers, second primaries localized in the head and neck or metastatic HNC were all chosen. Five studies were selected which met our selection criteria. Palliation of symptoms, response rates, and toxicities of these studies was evaluated. Role of such concurrent regimes at other sites have also been discussed. All the evaluated studies demonstrated good rates of symptom palliation and response rates with tolerable adverse effects. In addition, our literature review has identified a paucity of evidence that warrants large-scale longitudinal studies to derive conclusive remarks on the use of palliative CCRT.
在姑息性放疗方案中增加化疗的作用:印度三级癌症中心的文献和经验回顾
不可切除的头颈癌(HNCs)对临床肿瘤学家提出了重大挑战。放射治疗(RT)在晚期不可切除期的症状缓解中起着关键作用。姑息性放射治疗方案通常采用低分割方案,试图减少总体治疗时间和急性毒性。同步放化疗(CCRT)可以改善局部控制,促进症状更快缓解。然而,由于担心毒性增加,低分级化疗方案在姑息治疗中的作用尚不清楚。因此,我们进行了文献回顾,以验证CCRT在姑息环境中的耐受性和疗效。在电子数据库中使用合适的关键词进行文献检索。研究评估了未经治疗的患者、治疗过的复发性癌症、头部和颈部的第二原发灶或转移性HNC。5项研究符合我们的选择标准。评估了这些研究的症状缓解、反应率和毒性。还讨论了这种并行制度在其他场址的作用。所有被评估的研究都显示出良好的症状缓解率和可容忍的不良反应的反应率。此外,我们的文献综述发现,缺乏证据证明大规模的纵向研究可以得出关于姑息性CCRT使用的结论性评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信