Comparison of Two Muscle Relaxants for Tracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Surgery at Goa Medical College and Hospital

Anisha Deulker, R. Pai, S. Kamat, Eufemia Dias
{"title":"Comparison of Two Muscle Relaxants for Tracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Surgery at Goa Medical College and Hospital","authors":"Anisha Deulker, R. Pai, S. Kamat, Eufemia Dias","doi":"10.18410/jebmh/2021/567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Cisatracurium and atracurium are intermediate acting muscle relaxants which do not depend on renal or hepatic metabolism for elimination since they undergo Hofmann elimination. Despite the advantages of cisatracurium such as minimal effects on the cardiovascular system, no accumulative effects, no metabolite toxicity, and metabolic product has no neuromuscular blocking effects, due to slow onset and unsatisfactory intubating conditions, the use of cisatracurium is limited compared with those seen with equipotent doses of other neuromuscular blocking agents. This study was undertaken to find onset time and intubating conditions with 3 × ED95 doses of atracurium versus cisatracurium. METHODS ASA grade 1 or 2 patients, (N = 220) were randomly allocated into 2 groups to receive equipotent doses of either atracurium or cisatracurium. Intubating conditions were assessed using Cooper et al scale and neuromuscular monitoring done using TOF Watch SX. Haemodynamic responses and any adverse effects were noted. RESULTS The onset time was 167.36 ± 75.41 seconds (2.78 ± 1.25 minutes) in atracurium group whereas in cisatracurium group, onset time was 249.26 ± 75.90 seconds (4.15 ± 1.26) and the difference was statistically significant with p value of < 0.001. The difference in intubating conditions between the groups was statistically insignificant. However, atracurium produced a higher incidence of clinically acceptable conditions (excellent in 94.4 %) than cisatracurium (excellent in 87.3 %). The incidence of adverse effects such as erythema, flushing and bronchospasm was greater in Atracurium group though hypotension was observed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Onset time and intubating conditions are significantly better with equipotent doses of atracurium compared to cisatracurium. But atracurium is associated with higher incidence of adverse effects such as erythema, flushing and bronchospasm, though the potential of cisatracurium to cause anaphylactoid reactions cannot be ignored. KEYWORDS Cisatracurium, Atracurium, Muscle Relaxants, Neuromuscular Blocking Agents, Erythema, Flushing, Bronchospasm, Hypotension, Anaphylactoid Reactions","PeriodicalId":15779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18410/jebmh/2021/567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Cisatracurium and atracurium are intermediate acting muscle relaxants which do not depend on renal or hepatic metabolism for elimination since they undergo Hofmann elimination. Despite the advantages of cisatracurium such as minimal effects on the cardiovascular system, no accumulative effects, no metabolite toxicity, and metabolic product has no neuromuscular blocking effects, due to slow onset and unsatisfactory intubating conditions, the use of cisatracurium is limited compared with those seen with equipotent doses of other neuromuscular blocking agents. This study was undertaken to find onset time and intubating conditions with 3 × ED95 doses of atracurium versus cisatracurium. METHODS ASA grade 1 or 2 patients, (N = 220) were randomly allocated into 2 groups to receive equipotent doses of either atracurium or cisatracurium. Intubating conditions were assessed using Cooper et al scale and neuromuscular monitoring done using TOF Watch SX. Haemodynamic responses and any adverse effects were noted. RESULTS The onset time was 167.36 ± 75.41 seconds (2.78 ± 1.25 minutes) in atracurium group whereas in cisatracurium group, onset time was 249.26 ± 75.90 seconds (4.15 ± 1.26) and the difference was statistically significant with p value of < 0.001. The difference in intubating conditions between the groups was statistically insignificant. However, atracurium produced a higher incidence of clinically acceptable conditions (excellent in 94.4 %) than cisatracurium (excellent in 87.3 %). The incidence of adverse effects such as erythema, flushing and bronchospasm was greater in Atracurium group though hypotension was observed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Onset time and intubating conditions are significantly better with equipotent doses of atracurium compared to cisatracurium. But atracurium is associated with higher incidence of adverse effects such as erythema, flushing and bronchospasm, though the potential of cisatracurium to cause anaphylactoid reactions cannot be ignored. KEYWORDS Cisatracurium, Atracurium, Muscle Relaxants, Neuromuscular Blocking Agents, Erythema, Flushing, Bronchospasm, Hypotension, Anaphylactoid Reactions
两种肌肉松弛剂在果阿医学院及医院气管插管手术患者中的应用比较
顺阿曲库铵和阿曲库铵是不依赖于肾脏或肝脏代谢消除的中间作用肌肉松弛剂,因为它们经历霍夫曼消除。尽管顺阿曲库铵具有对心血管系统影响最小、无累积效应、无代谢物毒性、代谢产物无神经肌肉阻断作用等优点,但由于起效缓慢和插管条件不理想,与其他同等剂量的神经肌肉阻断剂相比,顺阿曲库铵的使用受到限制。本研究旨在发现3 × ED95剂量阿曲库铵与顺阿曲库铵的起效时间和插管条件。方法将ASA 1级或2级患者(N = 220)随机分为2组,分别给予同等剂量的阿曲库铵或顺阿曲库铵。使用Cooper等量表评估插管情况,使用TOF Watch SX进行神经肌肉监测。血流动力学反应和任何不良反应均被记录。结果阿曲库铵组的起效时间为167.36±75.41 s(2.78±1.25 min),顺阿曲库铵组的起效时间为249.26±75.90 s(4.15±1.26),差异有统计学意义,p值< 0.001。两组间插管条件差异无统计学意义。然而,阿曲库铵的临床可接受状况发生率(优)高于顺式阿曲库铵(优)(87.3%)。两组均出现低血压,但阿曲库铵组出现红斑、潮红、支气管痉挛等不良反应的发生率较高。结论:与顺式阿曲库铵相比,同等剂量阿曲库铵的起效时间和插管条件明显更好。但阿曲库铵与较高的不良反应发生率相关,如红斑、潮红和支气管痉挛,尽管顺阿曲库铵引起类过敏反应的可能性不容忽视。关键词顺阿曲库铵、阿曲库铵、肌肉松弛剂、神经肌肉阻滞剂、红斑、潮红、支气管痉挛、低血压、类过敏反应
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信