Stem Cell Therapy on the Internet: Information Quality and Content Analysis of English Language Web Pages Returned by Google

Q1 Computer Science
Douglas Meehan, I. Bizzi, P. Ghezzi
{"title":"Stem Cell Therapy on the Internet: Information Quality and Content Analysis of English Language Web Pages Returned by Google","authors":"Douglas Meehan, I. Bizzi, P. Ghezzi","doi":"10.3389/fict.2017.00028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are expectations that stem cell therapy (SCT) will treat many currently untreatable diseases. The Internet is widely used by patients seeking information about new treatments, and hence, analyzing websites is a representative sample of the information available to the public. Our aim was to understand what information the public would find when searching for information on SCT on Google, as this would inform us on how lay people form their knowledge about SCT. We analyzed the content and information quality of the first 200 websites returned by a Google.com search on SCT. Most websites returned were from treatment centers (TC, 44%) followed by news and medical professional websites. The specialty most mentioned in non-TC websites was “neurological” (67%), followed by “cardiovascular” (42%), while the most frequent indication for which SCT is offered by TCs was musculoskeletal (89%) followed by neurological (47%). 45% of the centers specialized in treating one specialty, 10% two and 45% offered between three and 18 different specialties. Of the 78 treatment centers, 65% were in the USA, 23% in Asia and 8% in Latin America. None of the centers offered SCT based on embryonic cells. Health information quality (JAMA score, measuring trustworthiness) was lowest for TCs and commercial websites and highest for scientific journals and health portals. This study shows a disconnection between information about SCT and what is actually offered by TCs. The study also shows that TCs, potentially acting in a regulatory grey area, have a high visibility on the Internet.","PeriodicalId":37157,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in ICT","volume":"135 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in ICT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2017.00028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

There are expectations that stem cell therapy (SCT) will treat many currently untreatable diseases. The Internet is widely used by patients seeking information about new treatments, and hence, analyzing websites is a representative sample of the information available to the public. Our aim was to understand what information the public would find when searching for information on SCT on Google, as this would inform us on how lay people form their knowledge about SCT. We analyzed the content and information quality of the first 200 websites returned by a Google.com search on SCT. Most websites returned were from treatment centers (TC, 44%) followed by news and medical professional websites. The specialty most mentioned in non-TC websites was “neurological” (67%), followed by “cardiovascular” (42%), while the most frequent indication for which SCT is offered by TCs was musculoskeletal (89%) followed by neurological (47%). 45% of the centers specialized in treating one specialty, 10% two and 45% offered between three and 18 different specialties. Of the 78 treatment centers, 65% were in the USA, 23% in Asia and 8% in Latin America. None of the centers offered SCT based on embryonic cells. Health information quality (JAMA score, measuring trustworthiness) was lowest for TCs and commercial websites and highest for scientific journals and health portals. This study shows a disconnection between information about SCT and what is actually offered by TCs. The study also shows that TCs, potentially acting in a regulatory grey area, have a high visibility on the Internet.
互联网上的干细胞治疗:谷歌返回的英文网页的信息质量和内容分析
人们期望干细胞疗法(SCT)能够治疗许多目前无法治愈的疾病。患者广泛使用互联网寻找有关新疗法的信息,因此,分析网站是公众可获得信息的代表性样本。我们的目的是了解公众在Google上搜索SCT信息时会发现什么信息,因为这将告诉我们外行人如何形成他们对SCT的知识。我们分析了Google.com在SCT上搜索返回的前200个网站的内容和信息质量。大多数返回的网站来自治疗中心(TC, 44%),其次是新闻和医疗专业网站。在非tc网站上提到最多的专业是“神经系统”(67%),其次是“心血管”(42%),而tc提供SCT的最常见适应症是肌肉骨骼(89%),其次是神经系统(47%)。45%的中心专门治疗一种专业,10%的中心治疗两种专业,45%的中心提供3到18种不同的专业。在78个治疗中心中,65%在美国,23%在亚洲,8%在拉丁美洲。没有一个中心提供基于胚胎细胞的SCT。健康信息质量(JAMA评分,衡量可信度)在tc和商业网站中最低,在科学期刊和健康门户中最高。这项研究表明,关于SCT的信息与tc实际提供的信息之间存在脱节。该研究还表明,tc可能处于监管的灰色地带,在互联网上具有很高的知名度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in ICT
Frontiers in ICT Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信