Algorithmic discrepancy beyond partial coloring

N. Bansal, S. Garg
{"title":"Algorithmic discrepancy beyond partial coloring","authors":"N. Bansal, S. Garg","doi":"10.1145/3055399.3055490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The partial coloring method is one of the most powerful and widely used method in combinatorial discrepancy problems. However, in many cases it leads to sub-optimal bounds as the partial coloring step must be iterated a logarithmic number of times, and the errors can add up in an adversarial way. We give a new and general algorithmic framework that overcomes the limitations of the partial coloring method and can be applied in a black-box manner to various problems. Using this framework, we give new improved bounds and algorithms for several classic problems in discrepancy. In particular, for Tusnady&'s problem, we give an improved O(log2 n) bound for discrepancy of axis-parallel rectangles and more generally an Od(logdn) bound for d-dimensional boxes in ℝd. Previously, even non-constructively, the best bounds were O(log2.5 n) and Od(logd+0.5n) respectively. Similarly, for the Steinitz problem we give the first algorithm that matches the best known non-constructive bounds due to Banaszczyk in the 𝓁∞ case, and improves the previous algorithmic bounds substantially in the 𝓁2 case. Our framework is based upon a substantial generalization of the techniques developed recently in the context of the Komlós discrepancy problem.","PeriodicalId":20615,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3055399.3055490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

The partial coloring method is one of the most powerful and widely used method in combinatorial discrepancy problems. However, in many cases it leads to sub-optimal bounds as the partial coloring step must be iterated a logarithmic number of times, and the errors can add up in an adversarial way. We give a new and general algorithmic framework that overcomes the limitations of the partial coloring method and can be applied in a black-box manner to various problems. Using this framework, we give new improved bounds and algorithms for several classic problems in discrepancy. In particular, for Tusnady&'s problem, we give an improved O(log2 n) bound for discrepancy of axis-parallel rectangles and more generally an Od(logdn) bound for d-dimensional boxes in ℝd. Previously, even non-constructively, the best bounds were O(log2.5 n) and Od(logd+0.5n) respectively. Similarly, for the Steinitz problem we give the first algorithm that matches the best known non-constructive bounds due to Banaszczyk in the 𝓁∞ case, and improves the previous algorithmic bounds substantially in the 𝓁2 case. Our framework is based upon a substantial generalization of the techniques developed recently in the context of the Komlós discrepancy problem.
超越部分着色的算法差异
部分着色法是求解组合差异问题中最有效、应用最广泛的方法之一。然而,在许多情况下,它会导致次优边界,因为部分着色步骤必须迭代对数次,并且错误可能以对抗的方式累积。我们给出了一个新的和通用的算法框架,克服了部分着色方法的局限性,并能以黑盒的方式应用于各种问题。在此框架下,我们对几个经典的差异问题给出了新的改进界和算法。特别地,对于Tusnady& s问题,我们给出了一个改进的O(log2 n)界用于轴平行矩形的差异,更一般地说,给出了一个Od(logdn)界用于d维盒子的差异。以前,即使是非建设性的,最好的边界分别是O(log2.5 n)和Od(logd+0.5n)。类似地,对于Steinitz问题,我们给出了在𝓁∞情况下匹配Banaszczyk的最著名的非建设性界的第一个算法,并在𝓁2情况下大大改进了先前的算法界。我们的框架基于最近在Komlós差异问题的背景下开发的技术的大量概括。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信