Micro-computed tomography evaluation of filling material removal by three reciprocating systems with different thermal treatments

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
A. Limoeiro, A. H. Braitt, Alessandra Silveira Machado, C. Bueno, C. Fontana, L. Freire, R. Lopes, A. S. D. Martin
{"title":"Micro-computed tomography evaluation of filling material removal by three reciprocating systems with different thermal treatments","authors":"A. Limoeiro, A. H. Braitt, Alessandra Silveira Machado, C. Bueno, C. Fontana, L. Freire, R. Lopes, A. S. D. Martin","doi":"10.32067/GIE.2021.35.01.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study compared the efficacy of three reciprocating systems with different heat treatments in removing obturator material from lower molar mesial canals. \nMethodology: The mesial canals of 18 lower molars were instrumented with ProTaper Next 25/0.06 and filled with gutta-percha and AHPlus. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n=6) according to the system used to remove the filling material: Reciproc (REC R25), Reciproc Blue (RECB R25) and Wave One Primary (WO). The desobturation was considered complete when the working length was reached, and remnants of obturator material were no longer found in the instrument and also in the canal walls, observed through the dental operating microscope. \nResults: The results were analyzed using Biostat 4.0 software. Shapiro-Wilk and ANOVA (Tukey) tests with a significance level of 5% were applied. The volume of obturator material decreased in the cervical and middle thirds after the use of REC, RECB and WO systems (P .05). In the apical third, there was no significant reduction in the remaining obturator material independent of the operating system (P>.05). \nConclusions: REC, RECB and WO systems showed similarity in the removal of obturator material and were inefficient specifically in the apical third, showing the limitation of these systems in removing obturation material from curved canals.","PeriodicalId":42221,"journal":{"name":"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2021.35.01.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aim: This study compared the efficacy of three reciprocating systems with different heat treatments in removing obturator material from lower molar mesial canals. Methodology: The mesial canals of 18 lower molars were instrumented with ProTaper Next 25/0.06 and filled with gutta-percha and AHPlus. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n=6) according to the system used to remove the filling material: Reciproc (REC R25), Reciproc Blue (RECB R25) and Wave One Primary (WO). The desobturation was considered complete when the working length was reached, and remnants of obturator material were no longer found in the instrument and also in the canal walls, observed through the dental operating microscope. Results: The results were analyzed using Biostat 4.0 software. Shapiro-Wilk and ANOVA (Tukey) tests with a significance level of 5% were applied. The volume of obturator material decreased in the cervical and middle thirds after the use of REC, RECB and WO systems (P .05). In the apical third, there was no significant reduction in the remaining obturator material independent of the operating system (P>.05). Conclusions: REC, RECB and WO systems showed similarity in the removal of obturator material and were inefficient specifically in the apical third, showing the limitation of these systems in removing obturation material from curved canals.
三种不同热处理往复系统去除填充材料的微计算机断层扫描评价
目的:比较三种往复系统在不同热处理条件下下磨牙近中管封闭材料去除的效果。方法:用ProTaper Next 25/0.06固定18颗下磨牙的近中根管,填充杜仲胶和AHPlus。根据去除充填材料的系统将牙齿随机分为三组(n=6): Reciproc (REC R25)、Reciproc Blue (RECB R25)和Wave One Primary (WO)。当达到工作长度时,通过牙科操作显微镜观察,在器械和管壁中不再发现残留的闭孔材料,则认为去封闭完成。结果:采用Biostat 4.0软件对结果进行分析。采用显著性水平为5%的Shapiro-Wilk检验和ANOVA (Tukey)检验。使用REC、RECB和WO系统后,颈部和中部三分之一的闭孔材料体积减少(P < 0.05)。在根尖三分之一处,与操作系统无关的剩余闭孔材料没有显著减少(P> 0.05)。结论:REC、RECB和WO系统在去除闭孔材料方面表现相似,特别是在根尖三分之一处效率低下,表明这些系统在去除弯曲管的闭孔材料方面存在局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia
Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia was founded in 1987 and is the official journal of the Italian Society of Endodontics (SIE). It is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles on clinical research and/or clinical methodology, case reports related to Endodontics. The Journal evaluates also contributes in restorative dentistry, dental traumatology, experimental pathophysiology, pharmacology and microbiology dealing with Endodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信