Grade Retention and Social Promotion in Texas 1994-99: An Assessment of Academic Achievement among Elementary School Students

J. Lorence, A. Dworkin, Laurence A. Toenjes, Antwanette N. Hill
{"title":"Grade Retention and Social Promotion in Texas 1994-99: An Assessment of Academic Achievement among Elementary School Students","authors":"J. Lorence, A. Dworkin, Laurence A. Toenjes, Antwanette N. Hill","doi":"10.1353/PEP.2002.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To make schools more accountable for the performance of students, many school districts as well as entire states have proposed more rigorous standards to help ensure that pupils have the basic skills necessary to be successful in school. Many public and private sector decisionmakers have criticized the common practice of social promotion; that is, allowing students to progress to the next grade level without having already learned the material required for the current grade. The public in general views the practice of social promotion or grade placement as detrimental to low-performing students who are promoted without requisite skills because such students are presumed to fall further behind their more academically proficient classmates. Consequently, some states and school districts have proposed or adopted strict policies of retention that require a low-achieving student to remain in the same grade until meeting a specified level of proficiency.1 Although these newer standards for promotion may vary across","PeriodicalId":9272,"journal":{"name":"Brookings Papers on Education Policy","volume":"8 1","pages":"13 - 67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brookings Papers on Education Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/PEP.2002.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

To make schools more accountable for the performance of students, many school districts as well as entire states have proposed more rigorous standards to help ensure that pupils have the basic skills necessary to be successful in school. Many public and private sector decisionmakers have criticized the common practice of social promotion; that is, allowing students to progress to the next grade level without having already learned the material required for the current grade. The public in general views the practice of social promotion or grade placement as detrimental to low-performing students who are promoted without requisite skills because such students are presumed to fall further behind their more academically proficient classmates. Consequently, some states and school districts have proposed or adopted strict policies of retention that require a low-achieving student to remain in the same grade until meeting a specified level of proficiency.1 Although these newer standards for promotion may vary across
1994- 1999年德州小学生学业成绩评价之成绩保留与社会提升
为了使学校对学生的表现更加负责,许多学区和整个州都提出了更严格的标准,以帮助确保学生拥有在学校取得成功所必需的基本技能。许多公共和私营部门的决策者批评了社会促进的普遍做法;也就是说,允许学生在没有学习当前年级所需的材料的情况下进入下一个年级。一般来说,公众认为社会晋升或等级分配的做法对表现不佳的学生是有害的,因为这些学生在没有必要技能的情况下获得晋升,因为他们被认为会远远落后于学业更优秀的同学。因此,一些州和学区提出或采取了严格的保留政策,要求成绩差的学生留在同一年级,直到达到规定的熟练程度尽管这些新的晋升标准可能会有所不同
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信