Muhammad Sajjad Ali, Shahzaib Maqbool, Azeen Razzaq, Abdur Rehman, Salman Yousaf, Muhammad Farhan, Maryam Farhan Baloch, Muhammad Abdul Khaliq Khan
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety Profile of Lenalidomide vs Lenalidomide + R-CHOP in patients with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review","authors":"Muhammad Sajjad Ali, Shahzaib Maqbool, Azeen Razzaq, Abdur Rehman, Salman Yousaf, Muhammad Farhan, Maryam Farhan Baloch, Muhammad Abdul Khaliq Khan","doi":"10.54393/pjhs.v4i08.947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most frequent cause of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, which accounts for around one-third of cases, is diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Immune chemotherapy combined with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is the standard therapy for DLBCL. Objective: To analysing the utilization of Lenalidomide versus Lenalidomide R-CHOP regimen in treatment of DLBCL in terms of treatment efficacy and safety. Methods: PRISMA guidelines were followed for conducting this study. A thorough literature search was done from November 15 to November 25, 2022. A variety of databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and other, were used to conduct the literature search. Finally, for this systematic review, 10 studies were chosen. Results: In our study the monotherapy with Lenalidomide was found less significant in terms of improvement in Overall response rate, complete response among patients with DLBCL. However; Lenalidomide + R-CHOP was more effective in improving overall response rate (ORR) with ORR of 92.89% vs 30.58% and complete response rate (CRR) of 80.20% vs 12.53%. The partial response rate (PR) was comparable between two therapies. similarly, the Progression free survival was also better in combination therapy. Haematological and Non-Hematological adverse effects of grade >3 were found higher among patients with combination therapy and Neutropenia was commonly observed adverse effect. Conclusions: Combination therapy was associated with significant improvement in disease outcome, however; the adverse effects were reported high in combination therapy vs monotherapy.\n ","PeriodicalId":45690,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences","volume":"138 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v4i08.947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The most frequent cause of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, which accounts for around one-third of cases, is diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Immune chemotherapy combined with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is the standard therapy for DLBCL. Objective: To analysing the utilization of Lenalidomide versus Lenalidomide R-CHOP regimen in treatment of DLBCL in terms of treatment efficacy and safety. Methods: PRISMA guidelines were followed for conducting this study. A thorough literature search was done from November 15 to November 25, 2022. A variety of databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and other, were used to conduct the literature search. Finally, for this systematic review, 10 studies were chosen. Results: In our study the monotherapy with Lenalidomide was found less significant in terms of improvement in Overall response rate, complete response among patients with DLBCL. However; Lenalidomide + R-CHOP was more effective in improving overall response rate (ORR) with ORR of 92.89% vs 30.58% and complete response rate (CRR) of 80.20% vs 12.53%. The partial response rate (PR) was comparable between two therapies. similarly, the Progression free survival was also better in combination therapy. Haematological and Non-Hematological adverse effects of grade >3 were found higher among patients with combination therapy and Neutropenia was commonly observed adverse effect. Conclusions: Combination therapy was associated with significant improvement in disease outcome, however; the adverse effects were reported high in combination therapy vs monotherapy.
非霍奇金淋巴瘤最常见的病因是弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL),约占病例的三分之一。免疫化疗联合利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和强的松(R-CHOP)是DLBCL的标准治疗方案。目的:比较来那度胺与来那度胺R-CHOP方案治疗大细胞淋巴瘤的疗效和安全性。方法:遵循PRISMA指南进行本研究。从2022年11月15日至11月25日进行了全面的文献检索。各种数据库,包括PubMed, Google Scholar等,被用来进行文献检索。最后,本系统综述选择了10项研究。结果:在我们的研究中,在DLBCL患者的总有效率和完全缓解方面,来那度胺单药治疗的改善效果不明显。然而;来那度胺+ R-CHOP在改善总缓解率(ORR)方面更有效,ORR为92.89% vs 30.58%,完全缓解率(CRR)为80.20% vs 12.53%。两种治疗的部分缓解率(PR)相当。同样,联合治疗的无进展生存期也更好。血液学和非血液学不良反应>3级在联合治疗患者中较高,中性粒细胞减少是常见的不良反应。结论:然而,联合治疗与疾病结局的显著改善相关;据报道,联合治疗的不良反应高于单一治疗。
期刊介绍:
Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences is an international biomedical journal from Pakistan. We publish materials of interest to the practitioners and scientists in the broad field of medicine. Articles describing original qualitative, quantitative, human/animal clinical or laboratory studies are considered for publication.