The unequal others: mediation of distant COVID-19 suffering in Chinese television news

IF 2.1 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Yan Yi
{"title":"The unequal others: mediation of distant COVID-19 suffering in Chinese television news","authors":"Yan Yi","doi":"10.1080/17544750.2023.2196086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study explores how the Chinese media have legitimated the Chinese government’s anti-COVID policy at home by constructing the spectatorship of foreign countries’ suffering during the pandemic. Using the Oriental News of Shanghai Media Group (SMG), a leader in Chinese provincial media, as a case study, the present study reveals that the core countries within the world system have been reported on more often than the semi-peripheral and peripheral countries. News about core countries also precedes news about non-core countries during the parts of broadcasts that concern the global COVID-19 pandemic. China’s specific geopolitical and national political contexts have significantly influenced the mediation of COVID-19 suffering in various countries. While the US is represented as experiencing multiple forms of “chaos” during the pandemic, African countries are represented as “allied others” or “weak others.” News about India, a country with national conditions similar to those of China, reminds Chinese spectators that the Chinese government’s strict controls are correct and effective. The mediation of other countries’ sufferings has produced various degrees of emotional involvement on the part of the Chinese public.","PeriodicalId":46367,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Communication","volume":"73 1","pages":"285 - 302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2023.2196086","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study explores how the Chinese media have legitimated the Chinese government’s anti-COVID policy at home by constructing the spectatorship of foreign countries’ suffering during the pandemic. Using the Oriental News of Shanghai Media Group (SMG), a leader in Chinese provincial media, as a case study, the present study reveals that the core countries within the world system have been reported on more often than the semi-peripheral and peripheral countries. News about core countries also precedes news about non-core countries during the parts of broadcasts that concern the global COVID-19 pandemic. China’s specific geopolitical and national political contexts have significantly influenced the mediation of COVID-19 suffering in various countries. While the US is represented as experiencing multiple forms of “chaos” during the pandemic, African countries are represented as “allied others” or “weak others.” News about India, a country with national conditions similar to those of China, reminds Chinese spectators that the Chinese government’s strict controls are correct and effective. The mediation of other countries’ sufferings has produced various degrees of emotional involvement on the part of the Chinese public.
不平等的他人:中国电视新闻中对遥远的COVID-19痛苦的调解
摘要:本研究探讨中国媒体如何通过构建疫情期间外国苦难的观感,将中国政府的抗疫政策在国内合法化。本研究以中国省级媒体的领军人物上海文广传媒集团旗下《东方新闻》为例,揭示了世界体系内的核心国家被报道的频率高于半外围和外围国家。在涉及COVID-19全球大流行的广播部分,有关核心国家的新闻也排在有关非核心国家的新闻之前。中国特定的地缘政治国情对各国应对疫情产生了重大影响。美国被描述为在疫情期间经历了多种形式的“混乱”,而非洲国家则被描述为“盟国”或“弱小国家”。关于印度这个与中国国情相似的国家的新闻提醒中国观众,中国政府的严格控制是正确和有效的。对其他国家苦难的调解在中国公众中产生了不同程度的情感参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信