Optimization and histological validation of DMEK graft preparation with specific instruments

Javier Cabrerizo , Clara Rodriguez-Aierbe , Klavs Højgaard-Olsen , Maria Christiansen-Kyhn , Mark Alberti , Jesus Garrido-Fierro
{"title":"Optimization and histological validation of DMEK graft preparation with specific instruments","authors":"Javier Cabrerizo ,&nbsp;Clara Rodriguez-Aierbe ,&nbsp;Klavs Højgaard-Olsen ,&nbsp;Maria Christiansen-Kyhn ,&nbsp;Mark Alberti ,&nbsp;Jesus Garrido-Fierro","doi":"10.1016/j.xjec.2018.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess the learning curve and technique standardization of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) preparation with a purpose-specific instruments at The Basque Transfusion and Human Tissue Centre.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty corneas not eligible for transplantation from 18 donors were prepared by an eye bank technician without previous surgical experience. The technique was monitored and standardized and three differentiated steps were characterized: “cleaning”, “stripping” and “pulling”. Preparation time, number of tears at every stage of the technique and donor demographics were measured. Tissue damage was catagorized into five graft morphological types. To evaluate microscopic tissue damage, electron microscopy images were taken from three pre-specified areas of the donor cornea: graft periphery, trabecular meshwork and denuded stroma.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Viable grafts resulted in 14 out of the 20 preparations. A positive trend was found between graft usability and the experience of the operator. Small peripheral round tears were the most common findings overall and in the viable grafts subset. Radial and round tears occurred most frequently during the stripping and the cleaning phase, respectively. Univariate analyses showed no correlation between preparation time, donor age and gender and culture medium.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>DMEK preparation with a purpose-specific instruments may have a relatively short learning curve, suggesting feasibility for eye bank technicians without previous surgical experience.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100782,"journal":{"name":"Journal of EuCornea","volume":"1 2","pages":"Pages 23-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.xjec.2018.07.001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of EuCornea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452403417300055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the learning curve and technique standardization of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) preparation with a purpose-specific instruments at The Basque Transfusion and Human Tissue Centre.

Methods

Twenty corneas not eligible for transplantation from 18 donors were prepared by an eye bank technician without previous surgical experience. The technique was monitored and standardized and three differentiated steps were characterized: “cleaning”, “stripping” and “pulling”. Preparation time, number of tears at every stage of the technique and donor demographics were measured. Tissue damage was catagorized into five graft morphological types. To evaluate microscopic tissue damage, electron microscopy images were taken from three pre-specified areas of the donor cornea: graft periphery, trabecular meshwork and denuded stroma.

Results

Viable grafts resulted in 14 out of the 20 preparations. A positive trend was found between graft usability and the experience of the operator. Small peripheral round tears were the most common findings overall and in the viable grafts subset. Radial and round tears occurred most frequently during the stripping and the cleaning phase, respectively. Univariate analyses showed no correlation between preparation time, donor age and gender and culture medium.

Conclusion

DMEK preparation with a purpose-specific instruments may have a relatively short learning curve, suggesting feasibility for eye bank technicians without previous surgical experience.

特定器械制备DMEK移植物的优化及组织学验证
目的评价巴斯克输血和人体组织中心使用专用仪器进行角膜内皮移植(DMEK)的学习曲线和技术标准化。方法由无手术经验的眼库技术人员制备18例不符合移植条件的角膜。对该技术进行了监控和标准化,并将其分为三个不同的步骤:“清洗”、“剥离”和“拉动”。测量技术各阶段的准备时间、泪滴数和供者人口统计数据。将组织损伤分为5种形态类型。为了评估显微组织损伤,电镜图像取自供体角膜三个预先指定的区域:移植物周围、小梁网和脱落的间质。结果20例移植体中14例移植成活。接枝可用性与操作人员的经验呈正相关。小的周围圆形撕裂是最常见的发现,在整体和存活的移植物亚群。径向撕裂和圆形撕裂分别发生在剥离和清洗阶段。单因素分析显示制备时间、供体年龄、性别和培养基无相关性。结论使用专用器械制备dmek具有较短的学习曲线,对于没有手术经验的眼库技术人员具有可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信