Evaluation of panoramic image quality in three images system.

Amaal kadhim ALSaadi
{"title":"Evaluation of panoramic image quality in three images system.","authors":"Amaal kadhim ALSaadi","doi":"10.26477/idj.v36i3.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In vitro study to evaluate the diagnostic image quality of dental panoramic radiography by comparing between conventional and digital systems. Aim of the Study: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the image quality of panoramic radiograph. Material and Method: Study comparing the image quality of dental Panoramic between conventional and digital in three dental institutions diagnostic imaging department. Forty five panoramic image were collected and divided in to three groups consisting of conventional images obtained with STRATO 2000, CE by VILLA SISTEMI MEDICALI–ITALY (screen based film) Dimax3digital system pan/ceph, PLANMECA, Helsinki, Finland, and Kodak 8000 carestream health, France (CCD X–ray image sensor). Image quality was assessed by rating the visibility of three evaluation aspect commonly found on panoramic radiographs for each image Depending on three evaluation aspect which is include the anatomy coverage, contrast and density of the teeth and anatomical structure, high score representing better image quality and the lower score indicating poor image quality. Results: the data collected from the evaluation of digital and film based image by two examiner were analyzed by chi square and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: The highest quality scores were obtained with carestream health digital system whereas images from Dimax3 digital system and conventional panoramic image type by VILLA SISTEMI were ranked significantly lower.","PeriodicalId":78326,"journal":{"name":"Iraqi Dental Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iraqi Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26477/idj.v36i3.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In vitro study to evaluate the diagnostic image quality of dental panoramic radiography by comparing between conventional and digital systems. Aim of the Study: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the image quality of panoramic radiograph. Material and Method: Study comparing the image quality of dental Panoramic between conventional and digital in three dental institutions diagnostic imaging department. Forty five panoramic image were collected and divided in to three groups consisting of conventional images obtained with STRATO 2000, CE by VILLA SISTEMI MEDICALI–ITALY (screen based film) Dimax3digital system pan/ceph, PLANMECA, Helsinki, Finland, and Kodak 8000 carestream health, France (CCD X–ray image sensor). Image quality was assessed by rating the visibility of three evaluation aspect commonly found on panoramic radiographs for each image Depending on three evaluation aspect which is include the anatomy coverage, contrast and density of the teeth and anatomical structure, high score representing better image quality and the lower score indicating poor image quality. Results: the data collected from the evaluation of digital and film based image by two examiner were analyzed by chi square and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: The highest quality scores were obtained with carestream health digital system whereas images from Dimax3 digital system and conventional panoramic image type by VILLA SISTEMI were ranked significantly lower.
三图像系统中全景图像质量的评价。
通过比较传统系统和数字系统,评价口腔全景x线摄影诊断图像质量的体外研究。研究目的:本研究的目的是比较和评价全景x线片的图像质量。材料与方法:比较三所牙科机构诊断影像学常规与数字化牙科全景图像质量的研究。收集45张全景图像并将其分为三组,其中包括由VILLA SISTEMI medici - italy(基于屏幕的胶片)获得的STRATO 2000, CE,芬兰赫尔辛基PLANMECA的dimax3数字系统pan/ceph和法国Kodak 8000 carestream health (CCD x射线图像传感器)获得的常规图像。图像质量是通过对全景x线片上常见的三个评价方面对每张图像的可见性进行评分来评估的,根据三个评价方面包括解剖覆盖、牙齿的对比度和密度以及解剖结构,得分高表示图像质量较好,得分低表示图像质量较差。结果:两名审查员对数字影像和胶片影像的评价数据进行卡方分析,差异有统计学意义。结论:carestream健康数字系统获得的影像质量评分最高,而Dimax3数字系统和VILLA SISTEMI传统全景影像类型的影像质量评分明显较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信