Managing Impulsive Purchases in Multi-Channel Online Retailing: Product Categories and Organizational Choices

IF 0.1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Nitish Jain, Sergei Savin, Narendra Singh
{"title":"Managing Impulsive Purchases in Multi-Channel Online Retailing: Product Categories and Organizational Choices","authors":"Nitish Jain, Sergei Savin, Narendra Singh","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3306898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multiple online channels allow a retailer to cover a wider range of situational purchase settings but also expose it to a more complex spectrum of consumer purchase behavior. Compared with the conventional desktop computer-based Web channel, the mobile-based application channel enables retailers to understand consumers better and, also, makes them more vulnerable to impulse purchases. The unique features of consumer experience and purchase behavior in each online channel raise the question of whether these channels should be managed jointly or separately. This study seeks to identify retail settings that favor a particular organizational choice. \n \nThe extant literature on multi-channel retail has paid scant attention to differences between these primary online channels. Our study helps to fill this gap, and it aims to equip retailers with a simple tool for comparing the organization's choices with regard to managing sales across the two channels. \n \nWe build a parsimonious model that captures key aspects of consumers' impulsive purchase behavior across various product types and two different online channels. In this model, the consumer's utility from purchasing a product via a particular channel consists of two correlated components: a channel-independent \"base'' component and a channel-specific \"impulsive'' component. We use this model to examine retailer performance when pricing is delegated to managers under separate-channel and joint-channel management schemes. \n \nWe find that products which induce impulsive purchase behavior strongly correlated with the base product valuation, such as high-value hedonic products, favor the joint-channel setup. In contrast, products with strong negative correlation between the base and impulsive valuation components, such as high-end durables, do better under separate-channel management. Online retailers should carefully curate their delegation strategies to manage the interplay between channels' natural differences and the product characteristics that shape how consumers' impulsive purchase behavior is related to their base valuations.","PeriodicalId":49886,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Engineering","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3306898","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple online channels allow a retailer to cover a wider range of situational purchase settings but also expose it to a more complex spectrum of consumer purchase behavior. Compared with the conventional desktop computer-based Web channel, the mobile-based application channel enables retailers to understand consumers better and, also, makes them more vulnerable to impulse purchases. The unique features of consumer experience and purchase behavior in each online channel raise the question of whether these channels should be managed jointly or separately. This study seeks to identify retail settings that favor a particular organizational choice. The extant literature on multi-channel retail has paid scant attention to differences between these primary online channels. Our study helps to fill this gap, and it aims to equip retailers with a simple tool for comparing the organization's choices with regard to managing sales across the two channels. We build a parsimonious model that captures key aspects of consumers' impulsive purchase behavior across various product types and two different online channels. In this model, the consumer's utility from purchasing a product via a particular channel consists of two correlated components: a channel-independent "base'' component and a channel-specific "impulsive'' component. We use this model to examine retailer performance when pricing is delegated to managers under separate-channel and joint-channel management schemes. We find that products which induce impulsive purchase behavior strongly correlated with the base product valuation, such as high-value hedonic products, favor the joint-channel setup. In contrast, products with strong negative correlation between the base and impulsive valuation components, such as high-end durables, do better under separate-channel management. Online retailers should carefully curate their delegation strategies to manage the interplay between channels' natural differences and the product characteristics that shape how consumers' impulsive purchase behavior is related to their base valuations.
多渠道在线零售中的冲动性购买管理:产品类别和组织选择
多种在线渠道使零售商能够覆盖更广泛的情景购买设置,但也使其暴露于更复杂的消费者购买行为范围。与传统的基于台式电脑的网络渠道相比,基于移动的应用渠道使零售商能够更好地了解消费者,同时也使他们更容易受到冲动购买的影响。每个在线渠道的消费者体验和购买行为的独特性提出了这些渠道是应该联合管理还是分开管理的问题。本研究旨在确定有利于特定组织选择的零售设置。现有的多渠道零售文献很少关注这些主要在线渠道之间的差异。我们的研究有助于填补这一空白,它旨在为零售商提供一个简单的工具,用于比较组织在管理两个渠道的销售方面的选择。我们建立了一个简约的模型,捕捉了消费者在不同产品类型和两种不同在线渠道中冲动购买行为的关键方面。在该模型中,消费者通过特定渠道购买产品的效用由两个相关组件组成:与渠道无关的“基础”组件和特定于渠道的“脉冲”组件。我们使用这个模型来检验零售商的表现,当定价委托给管理者在单独渠道和联合渠道管理方案。研究发现,那些与基础产品价值相关性强的产品,如高价值的享乐性产品,更倾向于联合渠道的建立。相比之下,基础和冲动性估值成分负相关较强的产品,如高端耐用品,在分渠道管理下表现更好。在线零售商应该仔细策划他们的授权策略,以管理渠道的自然差异和产品特性之间的相互作用,这些特性决定了消费者的冲动购买行为与他们的基础估值之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Manufacturing Engineering
Manufacturing Engineering 工程技术-工程:制造
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信