Transformed or Transferred? How Workers Perceive Managerial Control over Home Telework. Some Insights from an Italian Case

IF 0.4 4区 管理学 Q4 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Francesco E. Iannuzzi, Francesco Campolongo
{"title":"Transformed or Transferred? How Workers Perceive Managerial Control over Home Telework. Some Insights from an Italian Case","authors":"Francesco E. Iannuzzi, Francesco Campolongo","doi":"10.7202/1101313ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examined how home-based teleworkers perceived managerial control in an Italian context in order to gain insight into some of the organizational changes brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. Drawing on studies of changes to managerial control over the past few decades, we show how workers have experienced the reconfiguration and hybridization of control practices and methods in home telework. Our results cast doubt on the widely held belief that telework is revolutionizing managerial control and work procedures. Organizational and power dynamics at work are key to determining how telework affects employee experiences. Summary We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on labour relations, specifically by examining how teleworkers perceived control within various occupations in an Italian context. Telework has long been touted as having the power to displace traditional managerial control structures in favour of less hierarchical forms of supervision. However, scholars are still divided over whether it promotes greater employee autonomy or, on the contrary, results in greater managerial control. Research has frequently been influenced by specific circumstances. In earlier decades, the low prevalence of telework encouraged neither thorough research nor the ability to compare various organizational structures. Additionally, there has been a long-standing tendency to treat teleworkers as a homogeneous group, with little regard for within-group differences. Disparities among workers and among organizations can lead to inconsistent results. Our study was conducted mainly during the first waves of the pandemic in Italy, with a view to understanding if, how, to what extent and on what basis telework modifies managerial control processes and systems. We looked at how workers experienced managerial control in various occupations that differ in organizational form and managerial culture","PeriodicalId":45927,"journal":{"name":"Relations Industrielles-Industrial Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Relations Industrielles-Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1101313ar","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examined how home-based teleworkers perceived managerial control in an Italian context in order to gain insight into some of the organizational changes brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. Drawing on studies of changes to managerial control over the past few decades, we show how workers have experienced the reconfiguration and hybridization of control practices and methods in home telework. Our results cast doubt on the widely held belief that telework is revolutionizing managerial control and work procedures. Organizational and power dynamics at work are key to determining how telework affects employee experiences. Summary We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on labour relations, specifically by examining how teleworkers perceived control within various occupations in an Italian context. Telework has long been touted as having the power to displace traditional managerial control structures in favour of less hierarchical forms of supervision. However, scholars are still divided over whether it promotes greater employee autonomy or, on the contrary, results in greater managerial control. Research has frequently been influenced by specific circumstances. In earlier decades, the low prevalence of telework encouraged neither thorough research nor the ability to compare various organizational structures. Additionally, there has been a long-standing tendency to treat teleworkers as a homogeneous group, with little regard for within-group differences. Disparities among workers and among organizations can lead to inconsistent results. Our study was conducted mainly during the first waves of the pandemic in Italy, with a view to understanding if, how, to what extent and on what basis telework modifies managerial control processes and systems. We looked at how workers experienced managerial control in various occupations that differ in organizational form and managerial culture
转型还是转移?员工如何看待管理对家庭远程办公的控制。一个意大利案例的启示
为了深入了解COVID-19大流行带来的一些组织变化,我们研究了意大利背景下居家远程工作者如何感知管理控制。根据对过去几十年管理控制变化的研究,我们展示了工人如何在家庭远程办公中经历了控制实践和方法的重新配置和混合。我们的研究结果对人们普遍认为的远程办公正在彻底改变管理控制和工作程序的观点提出了质疑。工作中的组织和权力动态是决定远程办公如何影响员工体验的关键。我们调查了COVID-19大流行对劳资关系的影响,特别是通过研究意大利背景下远程工作者如何看待各种职业中的控制。长期以来,远程办公一直被吹捧为有能力取代传统的管理控制结构,有利于层级较低的监督形式。然而,对于它是促进了更大的员工自主权,还是相反,导致了更大的管理控制,学者们仍然存在分歧。研究经常受到具体情况的影响。在早期的几十年里,远程办公的低普及率既没有鼓励深入的研究,也没有能力比较不同的组织结构。此外,长期以来,人们倾向于将远程工作者视为一个同质群体,很少考虑群体内部的差异。员工之间和组织之间的差异可能导致不一致的结果。我们的研究主要是在意大利大流行的第一波期间进行的,目的是了解远程工作是否、如何、在多大程度上以及在什么基础上改变了管理控制流程和系统。我们研究了在不同的组织形式和管理文化中,员工是如何经历管理控制的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Relations Industrielles-Industrial Relations
Relations Industrielles-Industrial Relations INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信