Resistant Hypertension: Comparing Hemodynamic Management to Specialist Care

S. Taler, S. Textor, J. Augustine
{"title":"Resistant Hypertension: Comparing Hemodynamic Management to Specialist Care","authors":"S. Taler, S. Textor, J. Augustine","doi":"10.1161/01.HYP.0000016176.16042.2F","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although resistant hypertension affects a minority of all hypertensives, this group continues to experience disproportionately high cardiovascular event rates despite newer antihypertensive agents. Hypertension represents an imbalance of hemodynamic forces within the circulation, usually characterized by elevated systemic vascular resistance. We studied the utility of serial hemodynamic parameters in the selection and titration of antihypertensive medication in resistant hypertensive patients using highly reproducible noninvasive measurements by thoracic bioimpedance. Resistant hypertension patients (n=104) were randomized to drug selection based either on serial hemodynamic (HD) measurements and a predefined algorithm or on drug selection directed by a hypertension specialist (SC) in a 3-month intensive treatment program. Blood pressure was lowered by intensified drug therapy in both treatment groups (169±3/87±2 to 139±2/72±1 mm Hg HD versus 173±3/91±2 to 147±2/79±1 mm Hg SC, P <0.01 for systolic and diastolic BP), using similar numbers and intensity of antihypertensive medications. Blood pressures were reduced further for those treated according to hemodynamic measurements, resulting in improved control rates (56% HD versus 33% SC controlled to ≤140/90 mm Hg, P <0.05) and incremental reduction in systemic vascular resistance measurements. Although the number of patients taking diuretics did not differ between groups, final diuretic dosage was higher in the hemodynamic cohort. Our results demonstrate superior blood pressure control using a treatment algorithm and serial hemodynamic measurements compared with clinical judgment alone in a randomized prospective study. Our measurements of thoracic fluid volume support occult volume expansion as a mediator of antihypertensive drug resistance and use of impedance measurements to guide advancing diuretic dose and adjustment of multidrug antihypertensive treatment.","PeriodicalId":13233,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension: Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":"70 1","pages":"982-988"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"315","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension: Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000016176.16042.2F","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 315

Abstract

Although resistant hypertension affects a minority of all hypertensives, this group continues to experience disproportionately high cardiovascular event rates despite newer antihypertensive agents. Hypertension represents an imbalance of hemodynamic forces within the circulation, usually characterized by elevated systemic vascular resistance. We studied the utility of serial hemodynamic parameters in the selection and titration of antihypertensive medication in resistant hypertensive patients using highly reproducible noninvasive measurements by thoracic bioimpedance. Resistant hypertension patients (n=104) were randomized to drug selection based either on serial hemodynamic (HD) measurements and a predefined algorithm or on drug selection directed by a hypertension specialist (SC) in a 3-month intensive treatment program. Blood pressure was lowered by intensified drug therapy in both treatment groups (169±3/87±2 to 139±2/72±1 mm Hg HD versus 173±3/91±2 to 147±2/79±1 mm Hg SC, P <0.01 for systolic and diastolic BP), using similar numbers and intensity of antihypertensive medications. Blood pressures were reduced further for those treated according to hemodynamic measurements, resulting in improved control rates (56% HD versus 33% SC controlled to ≤140/90 mm Hg, P <0.05) and incremental reduction in systemic vascular resistance measurements. Although the number of patients taking diuretics did not differ between groups, final diuretic dosage was higher in the hemodynamic cohort. Our results demonstrate superior blood pressure control using a treatment algorithm and serial hemodynamic measurements compared with clinical judgment alone in a randomized prospective study. Our measurements of thoracic fluid volume support occult volume expansion as a mediator of antihypertensive drug resistance and use of impedance measurements to guide advancing diuretic dose and adjustment of multidrug antihypertensive treatment.
顽固性高血压:血流动力学管理与专科护理的比较
尽管顽固性高血压只影响所有高血压患者中的一小部分,但尽管有较新的抗高血压药物,这一群体仍有不成比例的高心血管事件发生率。高血压是血液动力学力量在循环中的不平衡,通常以全身血管阻力升高为特征。我们研究了一系列血液动力学参数在顽固性高血压患者抗高血压药物选择和滴定中的应用,采用高重复性的无创胸廓生物阻抗测量。在为期3个月的强化治疗方案中,顽固性高血压患者(n=104)根据连续血流动力学(HD)测量和预定义算法随机选择药物,或根据高血压专家(SC)指导的药物选择。两个治疗组在使用相同数量和强度的降压药物治疗后,血压均通过强化药物治疗降低(169±3/87±2至139±2/72±1 mm Hg HD vs 173±3/91±2至147±2/79±1 mm Hg SC,收缩压和舒张压P <0.01)。根据血流动力学测量进行治疗的患者血压进一步降低,导致控制率提高(56% HD vs 33% SC控制在≤140/90 mm Hg, P <0.05),全身血管阻力测量值逐渐降低。虽然服用利尿剂的患者数量在两组之间没有差异,但血液动力学组的最终利尿剂剂量更高。我们的研究结果表明,在一项随机前瞻性研究中,与单独的临床判断相比,使用治疗算法和一系列血流动力学测量的血压控制优于临床判断。我们测量胸腔液体容量支持隐性容量扩张作为抗高血压药物耐药的中介,并使用阻抗测量来指导推进利尿剂剂量和调整多药抗高血压治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信