Israeli Peace

Q3 Social Sciences
Abdelkarim Ben Dakhli
{"title":"Israeli Peace","authors":"Abdelkarim Ben Dakhli","doi":"10.1525/caa.2022.15.1.80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Philosophers have dwelt on the concept of peace to study its differences and diversity within the framework of a much more extensive and comprehensive field. They have discovered other concepts stemming from the main concept such as the recognition of the other, identity, altruism, cooperation, and integration. But along with its multiple subconcepts peacemaking is a complicated problematic concept. The difficulty of defining the concept of “peace” is not the main challenge, but rather the ability of such concept to reimagine the world so that it is compromised in political thought and practice. It is a concept that shapes the world, connecting the core with the margins, and steers policies of major countries influencing regional and global affairs. Following the collapse of the Soviet Union and the global balance of power, interest in the concept of peace grew. Given how peace can influence the situation in the Arab region, and its relation to the Arab–Israeli conflict, it is vital to research the components and strategies of “the Israeli peace” and how it impacts the Arab region. This article focuses on “the Israeli peace,” highlighting its themes and approaches, and also unveils the Israeli drive and aspiration to structure a new Arab regional order based on hegemony and dependency. If the Arabs wish to achieve peace, they will have to reconsider the main premises of peace, its theoretical assumptions, and practical procedures, especially after consecutive US administrations have abandoned their role of honest broker in overseeing negotiations. The article poses several questions in relation to whether and how a peaceful settlement is equal to “the Israeli peace,” and how it could be relevant to and based on mutual interests. What makes any peace inclusive and what are the differences between different approaches? In this context, the article analyses the complications related to peace in the region, adhering to an approach in which it acknowledges the historical, political, and cultural overlap that is connected to the nature and comprehensiveness of the concept of peace.","PeriodicalId":39004,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Arab Affairs","volume":"206 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Arab Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/caa.2022.15.1.80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Philosophers have dwelt on the concept of peace to study its differences and diversity within the framework of a much more extensive and comprehensive field. They have discovered other concepts stemming from the main concept such as the recognition of the other, identity, altruism, cooperation, and integration. But along with its multiple subconcepts peacemaking is a complicated problematic concept. The difficulty of defining the concept of “peace” is not the main challenge, but rather the ability of such concept to reimagine the world so that it is compromised in political thought and practice. It is a concept that shapes the world, connecting the core with the margins, and steers policies of major countries influencing regional and global affairs. Following the collapse of the Soviet Union and the global balance of power, interest in the concept of peace grew. Given how peace can influence the situation in the Arab region, and its relation to the Arab–Israeli conflict, it is vital to research the components and strategies of “the Israeli peace” and how it impacts the Arab region. This article focuses on “the Israeli peace,” highlighting its themes and approaches, and also unveils the Israeli drive and aspiration to structure a new Arab regional order based on hegemony and dependency. If the Arabs wish to achieve peace, they will have to reconsider the main premises of peace, its theoretical assumptions, and practical procedures, especially after consecutive US administrations have abandoned their role of honest broker in overseeing negotiations. The article poses several questions in relation to whether and how a peaceful settlement is equal to “the Israeli peace,” and how it could be relevant to and based on mutual interests. What makes any peace inclusive and what are the differences between different approaches? In this context, the article analyses the complications related to peace in the region, adhering to an approach in which it acknowledges the historical, political, and cultural overlap that is connected to the nature and comprehensiveness of the concept of peace.
以色列和平
哲学家们一直在研究和平的概念,以便在一个更广泛和全面的领域的框架内研究和平的差异和多样性。他们还发现了源于主要概念的其他概念,如承认他人、身份、利他主义、合作和整合。但是,与它的多个子概念一起,维持和平是一个复杂的、有问题的概念。界定“和平”概念的困难并不是主要的挑战,而是这种概念重新构想世界的能力,从而使其在政治思想和实践中受到损害。这一理念塑造着世界,连接着核心与边缘,指引着影响地区和全球事务的大国政策。在苏联解体和全球力量平衡之后,人们对和平概念的兴趣日益浓厚。鉴于和平如何影响阿拉伯区域的局势及其与阿以冲突的关系,研究"以色列和平"的组成部分和战略以及它如何影响阿拉伯区域至关重要。本文聚焦于“以色列和平”,突出其主题和方法,并揭示了以色列在霸权和依赖的基础上构建新的阿拉伯地区秩序的动力和愿望。如果阿拉伯人希望实现和平,他们将不得不重新考虑和平的主要前提,其理论假设和实际程序,特别是在连续几届美国政府放弃了他们在监督谈判中诚实经纪人的角色之后。这篇文章提出了几个问题,涉及和平解决是否以及如何等于“以色列和平”,以及它如何与共同利益相关并以共同利益为基础。是什么使和平具有包容性?不同方式之间的区别是什么?在这种背景下,本文分析了与该地区和平有关的复杂性,坚持一种方法,即承认与和平概念的性质和全面性有关的历史,政治和文化重叠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Arab Affairs
Contemporary Arab Affairs Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信