Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to assess effect of conformance control treatments on water-injection wells

IF 4.2 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Hu Jia , Pengwu Li , Wei Lv , Jianke Ren , Chen Cheng , Rui Zhang , Zhengjun Zhou , Yanbin Liang
{"title":"Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to assess effect of conformance control treatments on water-injection wells","authors":"Hu Jia ,&nbsp;Pengwu Li ,&nbsp;Wei Lv ,&nbsp;Jianke Ren ,&nbsp;Chen Cheng ,&nbsp;Rui Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhengjun Zhou ,&nbsp;Yanbin Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.petlm.2022.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As an effective method to prolong the life of mature field, conformance control in water-injection well has been used wildly. Naturally, effect evaluation of conformance control has attracted great attention because it is an important guideline for the design of later enhanced oil recovery (EOR) plan. Usually, production responses such as excessive water reduction and oil production increment are widely used as the indicators. However, production responses may be unreliable due to the difficulty in determining an effective injection well which is caused by a large number of treated water-injection wells in a well group. Therefore, with the application of fuzzy comprehension evaluation (FCE), five evaluation indexes (injection pressure, injectivity index, slope of hall curve, variation coefficient and homogenization coefficient of injection profile) describe injection responses were selected to establish a new evaluation method in this paper. Based on fuzzy mathematics, FCE reflects the difference of evaluation units. Meanwhile, weights of evaluation indexes were obtained by analytic hierarchy process (AHP), which made the results more convincing. Taking Bai 239 oilfield as an example, the five injection responses indexes were used to assess treatment effect on five water-injection wells by single index evaluation and FCE. The results showed that among the five evaluation indexes mentioned above, the slope of hall curve was the most important factor affected evaluation result. In single index evaluation, opposite results may be produced easily on account of the one-sidedness of single index or human error. Furthermore, we found that effective treatment was a relative concept actually. The result of FCE was consistent with single index evaluation but FCE was more acceptable. This study suggests that FCE could be applied to another field such as water flooding, acidizing and hydraulic fracturing</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37433,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum","volume":"10 1","pages":"Pages 165-174"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405656122000426/pdfft?md5=3cf8014af0a9395d260eeae8306c31c6&pid=1-s2.0-S2405656122000426-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405656122000426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As an effective method to prolong the life of mature field, conformance control in water-injection well has been used wildly. Naturally, effect evaluation of conformance control has attracted great attention because it is an important guideline for the design of later enhanced oil recovery (EOR) plan. Usually, production responses such as excessive water reduction and oil production increment are widely used as the indicators. However, production responses may be unreliable due to the difficulty in determining an effective injection well which is caused by a large number of treated water-injection wells in a well group. Therefore, with the application of fuzzy comprehension evaluation (FCE), five evaluation indexes (injection pressure, injectivity index, slope of hall curve, variation coefficient and homogenization coefficient of injection profile) describe injection responses were selected to establish a new evaluation method in this paper. Based on fuzzy mathematics, FCE reflects the difference of evaluation units. Meanwhile, weights of evaluation indexes were obtained by analytic hierarchy process (AHP), which made the results more convincing. Taking Bai 239 oilfield as an example, the five injection responses indexes were used to assess treatment effect on five water-injection wells by single index evaluation and FCE. The results showed that among the five evaluation indexes mentioned above, the slope of hall curve was the most important factor affected evaluation result. In single index evaluation, opposite results may be produced easily on account of the one-sidedness of single index or human error. Furthermore, we found that effective treatment was a relative concept actually. The result of FCE was consistent with single index evaluation but FCE was more acceptable. This study suggests that FCE could be applied to another field such as water flooding, acidizing and hydraulic fracturing

应用模糊综合评价法评估注水井一致性控制处理效果
作为延长成熟油田寿命的一种有效方法,注水井的一致性控制已得到广泛应用。当然,一致性控制的效果评价也备受关注,因为它是后期强化采油(EOR)方案设计的重要依据。通常,过量减水和增产等生产反应被广泛用作指标。然而,由于一个井组中有大量经过处理的注水井,很难确定有效的注水井,因此生产反应可能并不可靠。因此,本文应用模糊理解评价(FCE),选取了描述注水响应的五个评价指标(注水压力、注水率指数、注水曲线斜率、注水曲线变异系数和均质系数),建立了一种新的评价方法。基于模糊数学,FCE 反映了评价单元的差异。同时,通过层次分析法(AHP)获得评价指标的权重,使评价结果更具说服力。以白239油田为例,利用五项注水反应指标,通过单指标评价和FCE对五口注水井的处理效果进行评价。结果表明,在上述五个评价指标中,霍尔曲线斜率是影响评价结果的最重要因素。在单指标评价中,由于单指标的片面性或人为误差,容易产生相反的结果。此外,我们还发现有效治疗实际上是一个相对概念。FCE 的结果与单指标评价结果一致,但 FCE 更容易被接受。这项研究表明,FCE 可应用于其他领域,如水淹、酸化和水力压裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Petroleum
Petroleum Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
124 days
期刊介绍: Examples of appropriate topical areas that will be considered include the following: 1.comprehensive research on oil and gas reservoir (reservoir geology): -geological basis of oil and gas reservoirs -reservoir geochemistry -reservoir formation mechanism -reservoir identification methods and techniques 2.kinetics of oil and gas basins and analyses of potential oil and gas resources: -fine description factors of hydrocarbon accumulation -mechanism analysis on recovery and dynamic accumulation process -relationship between accumulation factors and the accumulation process -analysis of oil and gas potential resource 3.theories and methods for complex reservoir geophysical prospecting: -geophysical basis of deep geologic structures and background of hydrocarbon occurrence -geophysical prediction of deep and complex reservoirs -physical test analyses and numerical simulations of reservoir rocks -anisotropic medium seismic imaging theory and new technology for multiwave seismic exploration -o theories and methods for reservoir fluid geophysical identification and prediction 4.theories, methods, technology, and design for complex reservoir development: -reservoir percolation theory and application technology -field development theories and methods -theory and technology for enhancing recovery efficiency 5.working liquid for oil and gas wells and reservoir protection technology: -working chemicals and mechanics for oil and gas wells -reservoir protection technology 6.new techniques and technologies for oil and gas drilling and production: -under-balanced drilling/gas drilling -special-track well drilling -cementing and completion of oil and gas wells -engineering safety applications for oil and gas wells -new technology of fracture acidizing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信