Understanding the heterogeneity of smallholder production systems in the Andean tropics – The case of Colombian tomato growers

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Rodrigo Gil , Carlos Ricardo Bojacá , Eddie Schrevens
{"title":"Understanding the heterogeneity of smallholder production systems in the Andean tropics – The case of Colombian tomato growers","authors":"Rodrigo Gil ,&nbsp;Carlos Ricardo Bojacá ,&nbsp;Eddie Schrevens","doi":"10.1016/j.njas.2019.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In developing countries, a common goal is to improve horticultural production systems as a strategy to increase food security and to improve the living conditions of these rural communities. However, smallholder-based agricultural systems are highly heterogeneous due to the wide range of biophysical conditions to which the crops are exposed, and the diversity in the management practices. In order to implement programs aimed at improving the productivity of these systems it is necessary to recognize its variability in quantitative terms. The main objective of this work was to describe the heterogeneity associated to smallholder production systems, using as a case study the Colombian tomato growers. Data were collected from two tomato production zones located in the Colombian Andes and under two cropping systems being the open field (<em>OF</em>) and the greenhouse (<em>GH</em>) production models. In both zones, the climate was described based on historical records, soil samples were taken to determine the natural fertility and the growers’ management practices were inquired. We also compared two instruments for data collection, surveys and detailed follow-ups. A higher heterogeneity in environmental conditions and management practices was evidenced for the <em>OF</em> system compared to the <em>GH</em> system. The fertilization strategies used by <em>GH</em> growers caused a significant increase in soil nutrient content, electrical conductivity and acidity. We found a higher productivity per square meter in the <em>GH</em> system, however the yield per plant was higher for the <em>OF</em> system (4.88 kg plant<sup>−1</sup>) in comparison with the <em>GH</em> system (2.84 kg plant<sup>−1</sup>). Results also indicated that follow-ups are an appropriate instrument to obtain accurate inventories. Knowledge empowerment arises as the key point to improve the smallholder’s productivities; in opposition to results elsewhere, where economic constraints are highlighted as the important sources of variability and low yields.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49751,"journal":{"name":"Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences","volume":"88 ","pages":"Pages 1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.njas.2019.02.002","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1573521418301787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

In developing countries, a common goal is to improve horticultural production systems as a strategy to increase food security and to improve the living conditions of these rural communities. However, smallholder-based agricultural systems are highly heterogeneous due to the wide range of biophysical conditions to which the crops are exposed, and the diversity in the management practices. In order to implement programs aimed at improving the productivity of these systems it is necessary to recognize its variability in quantitative terms. The main objective of this work was to describe the heterogeneity associated to smallholder production systems, using as a case study the Colombian tomato growers. Data were collected from two tomato production zones located in the Colombian Andes and under two cropping systems being the open field (OF) and the greenhouse (GH) production models. In both zones, the climate was described based on historical records, soil samples were taken to determine the natural fertility and the growers’ management practices were inquired. We also compared two instruments for data collection, surveys and detailed follow-ups. A higher heterogeneity in environmental conditions and management practices was evidenced for the OF system compared to the GH system. The fertilization strategies used by GH growers caused a significant increase in soil nutrient content, electrical conductivity and acidity. We found a higher productivity per square meter in the GH system, however the yield per plant was higher for the OF system (4.88 kg plant−1) in comparison with the GH system (2.84 kg plant−1). Results also indicated that follow-ups are an appropriate instrument to obtain accurate inventories. Knowledge empowerment arises as the key point to improve the smallholder’s productivities; in opposition to results elsewhere, where economic constraints are highlighted as the important sources of variability and low yields.

了解安第斯热带地区小农生产系统的异质性——以哥伦比亚番茄种植者为例
在发展中国家,一个共同的目标是改善园艺生产系统,作为增加粮食安全和改善这些农村社区生活条件的一项战略。然而,由于作物所面临的生物物理条件范围广泛,以及管理做法的多样性,以小农为基础的农业系统具有高度的异质性。为了实施旨在提高这些系统生产力的计划,有必要从数量上认识到其可变性。这项工作的主要目的是描述与小农生产系统相关的异质性,并以哥伦比亚番茄种植者为例进行研究。数据收集自位于哥伦比亚安第斯山脉的两个番茄生产区,采用两种种植制度,即露天大田(OF)和温室(GH)生产模式。在这两个地区,气候都是根据历史记录来描述的,土壤样本被采集来确定自然肥力,种植者的管理实践被询问。我们还比较了两种工具的数据收集、调查和详细的随访。与GH系统相比,OF系统在环境条件和管理实践方面具有更高的异质性。生长激素种植者采用的施肥策略显著提高了土壤养分含量、电导率和酸度。我们发现生长激素系统每平方米的生产力更高,但单株产量(4.88 kg株- 1)高于生长激素系统(2.84 kg株- 1)。结果还表明,随访是获得准确清单的适当工具。知识赋权成为提高小农生产力的关键;与其他地方的结果相反,在其他地方,经济约束被强调为可变性和低收益率的重要来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences
Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 农林科学-农业综合
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, published since 1952, is the quarterly journal of the Royal Netherlands Society for Agricultural Sciences. NJAS aspires to be the main scientific platform for interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research on complex and persistent problems in agricultural production, food and nutrition security and natural resource management. The societal and technical challenges in these domains require research integrating scientific disciplines and finding novel combinations of methodologies and conceptual frameworks. Moreover, the composite nature of these problems and challenges fits transdisciplinary research approaches embedded in constructive interactions with policy and practice and crossing the boundaries between science and society. Engaging with societal debate and creating decision space is an important task of research about the diverse impacts of novel agri-food technologies or policies. The international nature of food and nutrition security (e.g. global value chains, standardisation, trade), environmental problems (e.g. climate change or competing claims on natural resources), and risks related to agriculture (e.g. the spread of plant and animal diseases) challenges researchers to focus not only on lower levels of aggregation, but certainly to use interdisciplinary research to unravel linkages between scales or to analyse dynamics at higher levels of aggregation. NJAS recognises that the widely acknowledged need for interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research, also increasingly expressed by policy makers and practitioners, needs a platform for creative researchers and out-of-the-box thinking in the domains of agriculture, food and environment. The journal aims to offer space for grounded, critical, and open discussions that advance the development and application of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research methodologies in the agricultural and life sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信