{"title":"Grammaticalization of Progressive Aspect in a Slavic Dialect in Albania","authors":"Maxim Makartsev","doi":"10.1163/19552629-bja10012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe article focuses on two markers of progressive aspect that are emerging in a Balkan Slavic dialect in Albania, presumably under Albanian influence. One of them dates back to locative (ǵe ‘where’). Two processes intertwine on the grammaticalisation path of the other (toko): originally an adversative conjunction (‘but’), it was structurally mapped to its polysemic (adversative, but also affirmative, progressive, conditional) Albanian counterpart po. At the same time, its choice to mark progressive was additionally motivated by the phonetic similarity with another Albanian progressive marker duke. In the first third of the 20th century both markers were used as synonyms. However, during the subsequent process of language attrition the language community in question split into three groups regarding the use of the markers: of the last six remaining speakers one speaker used only ǵe as an optional marker; one speaker used toko as an optional marker; four other speakers used toko as a regular progressive marker.","PeriodicalId":43304,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Contact","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Contact","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-bja10012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article focuses on two markers of progressive aspect that are emerging in a Balkan Slavic dialect in Albania, presumably under Albanian influence. One of them dates back to locative (ǵe ‘where’). Two processes intertwine on the grammaticalisation path of the other (toko): originally an adversative conjunction (‘but’), it was structurally mapped to its polysemic (adversative, but also affirmative, progressive, conditional) Albanian counterpart po. At the same time, its choice to mark progressive was additionally motivated by the phonetic similarity with another Albanian progressive marker duke. In the first third of the 20th century both markers were used as synonyms. However, during the subsequent process of language attrition the language community in question split into three groups regarding the use of the markers: of the last six remaining speakers one speaker used only ǵe as an optional marker; one speaker used toko as an optional marker; four other speakers used toko as a regular progressive marker.
这篇文章的重点是在阿尔巴尼亚的巴尔干斯拉夫方言中出现的两个进步方面的标志,大概是在阿尔巴尼亚的影响下。其中一个可以追溯到位置(ǵe ' where ')。两个过程在另一个(toko)的语法化路径上交织在一起:最初是一个对口连词(“but”),它在结构上被映射到它的多义(对口的,但也是肯定的,进步的,条件的)阿尔巴尼亚语对应物po。同时,与另一个阿尔巴尼亚语进行性标记duke在语音上相似也是其选择进行性标记的另一个动机。在20世纪的前三分之一,这两种标记都被用作同义词。然而,在随后的语言消耗过程中,有关的语言社区在使用标记方面分成了三组:在剩下的最后六个发言者中,一个发言者只使用ǵe作为可选的标记;一位发言者使用toko作为可选的标记;另外四位发言者使用toko作为常规的递进标记。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Language Contact (JLC) is a peer-reviewed open access journal. It focuses on the study of language contact, language use and language change in accordance with a view of language contact whereby both empirical data (the precise description of languages and how they are used) and the resulting theoretical elaborations (hence the statement and analysis of new problems) become the primary engines for advancing our understanding of the nature of language. This involves linguistic, anthropological, historical, and cognitive factors. Such an approach makes a major new contribution to understanding language change at a time when there is a notable increase of interest and activity in this field. The Journal of Language Contact accepts articles in English and French.