Cosmological Aspect in the Contemporary Ukrainian Theological Discourse: the Controversy of the Phenomenological-poetic and Analytical-philosophical School

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY
S. Shkil, Yuriy Chornomorets
{"title":"Cosmological Aspect in the Contemporary Ukrainian Theological Discourse: the Controversy of the Phenomenological-poetic and Analytical-philosophical School","authors":"S. Shkil, Yuriy Chornomorets","doi":"10.29202/PHIL-COSM/22/16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a confrontation between phenomenological-poetic and analytical-philosophical ways of understanding the relations of “man-universe” in modern Ukrainian theology. The predominance of the first is related to the Orthodox theological culture, which is still a kind of idealism, albeit in postmetaphysical clothing. For Oleksandr Filonenko, the universe is a context for the development of the theoretical anthropological reality. Serhii Sannikov criticizes such a theology, believing that the universe already exists in God’s Logos. Understanding the universe as created for God-man’s synthesis points to the decisive influence of Russian religious philosophy on the theory of these Ukrainian theologians. However, the influence of the modern Protestant theologian Thomas F. Torrence is important. Ukrainian analytical natural theology of Baptist Fedir Stryzhachuk and Catholic Andrii Baumeyster creatively develops the Plantinga and Swinburne’s theory. This theology makes possible to reject critically such idealistic theories, pointing out the possible consequences for the society of theological utopianism. In this respect, Ukrainian theologians re-actualize of Karl Barth’s criticism for the natural theology; however, show that analytical natural theology can avoid Barth’s arguments. The construction of postmetaphysical natural theology in Ukraine opens up new opportunities for the dialogue between science and religion, philosophy and theology.","PeriodicalId":42240,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Cosmology-Filosofiya i Kosmologiya","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy and Cosmology-Filosofiya i Kosmologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29202/PHIL-COSM/22/16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a confrontation between phenomenological-poetic and analytical-philosophical ways of understanding the relations of “man-universe” in modern Ukrainian theology. The predominance of the first is related to the Orthodox theological culture, which is still a kind of idealism, albeit in postmetaphysical clothing. For Oleksandr Filonenko, the universe is a context for the development of the theoretical anthropological reality. Serhii Sannikov criticizes such a theology, believing that the universe already exists in God’s Logos. Understanding the universe as created for God-man’s synthesis points to the decisive influence of Russian religious philosophy on the theory of these Ukrainian theologians. However, the influence of the modern Protestant theologian Thomas F. Torrence is important. Ukrainian analytical natural theology of Baptist Fedir Stryzhachuk and Catholic Andrii Baumeyster creatively develops the Plantinga and Swinburne’s theory. This theology makes possible to reject critically such idealistic theories, pointing out the possible consequences for the society of theological utopianism. In this respect, Ukrainian theologians re-actualize of Karl Barth’s criticism for the natural theology; however, show that analytical natural theology can avoid Barth’s arguments. The construction of postmetaphysical natural theology in Ukraine opens up new opportunities for the dialogue between science and religion, philosophy and theology.
当代乌克兰神学话语中的宇宙论观点:现象学诗学与分析哲学学派之争
在现代乌克兰神学中,对“人-宇宙”关系的理解存在着现象学-诗学与分析-哲学的对立。前者的优势与东正教神学文化有关,东正教神学文化仍然是一种唯心主义,尽管披着后形而上学的外衣。对于Oleksandr Filonenko来说,宇宙是理论人类学现实发展的背景。Serhii Sannikov批评这种神学,认为宇宙已经存在于上帝的逻各斯中。理解宇宙是为神与人的综合而创造的,指出了俄罗斯宗教哲学对这些乌克兰神学家的理论的决定性影响。然而,现代新教神学家托马斯·f·托伦斯的影响是重要的。乌克兰分析自然神学的浸信会教徒Fedir Stryzhachuk和天主教徒Andrii Baumeyster创造性地发展了Plantinga和Swinburne的理论。这种神学使批判地拒绝这种唯心主义理论成为可能,并指出了神学乌托邦主义社会的可能后果。在这方面,乌克兰神学家重新实现了卡尔·巴特对自然神学的批判;然而,分析性自然神学可以避免巴特的论点。乌克兰后形而上学自然神学的建构为科学与宗教、哲学与神学的对话开辟了新的契机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信