Perceptions of the Peer Review Process in Hospitality and Tourism

IF 2.5 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
C. Deale, Seung-Hyun Lee, Stephanie Bae
{"title":"Perceptions of the Peer Review Process in Hospitality and Tourism","authors":"C. Deale, Seung-Hyun Lee, Stephanie Bae","doi":"10.1080/10963758.2020.1729771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The peer review process is an important part of the academic research process; yet, little is known about the perceptions of the process held by those who participate in it, including within the hospitality and tourism discipline. This study surveyed hospitality and tourism scholars to determine their views of the peer review process. Most of those surveyed were involved in the peer review process in several roles; valued a truly double-blind, timely review process; and overall did not think that the review process in the hospitality and tourism discipline is unethical or deteriorating. However, while the survey results indicated that hospitality and tourism scholars had relatively positive views of the peer review process in their field, they felt that the process could be improved.","PeriodicalId":46390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education","volume":"40 1","pages":"288 - 298"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2020.1729771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The peer review process is an important part of the academic research process; yet, little is known about the perceptions of the process held by those who participate in it, including within the hospitality and tourism discipline. This study surveyed hospitality and tourism scholars to determine their views of the peer review process. Most of those surveyed were involved in the peer review process in several roles; valued a truly double-blind, timely review process; and overall did not think that the review process in the hospitality and tourism discipline is unethical or deteriorating. However, while the survey results indicated that hospitality and tourism scholars had relatively positive views of the peer review process in their field, they felt that the process could be improved.
对酒店业和旅游业同行评审过程的看法
同行评议过程是学术研究过程的重要组成部分;然而,参与这一进程的人,包括在接待和旅游学科内,对这一进程的看法知之甚少。本研究调查了酒店和旅游学者,以确定他们对同行评审过程的看法。大多数被调查者都以不同的身份参与了同行评议过程;重视真正的双盲、及时的评审过程;总的来说,我不认为酒店和旅游学科的审查过程是不道德的或恶化的。然而,虽然调查结果表明,酒店和旅游学者对各自领域的同行评议过程持相对积极的看法,但他们认为这一过程可以改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education
Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
17.20%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信