Convalescent Plasma as a Plausible Therapeutic Option for nCOVID-19: A Review

T. Anudeep, Madhan Jeyaraman, Dharma U. Shetty, M. Hemmanthraj, Ajay Ss, Rajeswari Somasundaram, Vinodh Kumar, R. Jain, Shirodkar Jasw, I. Dilip
{"title":"Convalescent Plasma as a Plausible Therapeutic Option for nCOVID-19: A Review","authors":"T. Anudeep, Madhan Jeyaraman, Dharma U. Shetty, M. Hemmanthraj, Ajay Ss, Rajeswari Somasundaram, Vinodh Kumar, R. Jain, Shirodkar Jasw, I. Dilip","doi":"10.35248/2167-0870.20.10.409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The world is battling a pandemic caused by the newly emerged strain of coronavirus; upon identification SARSCoV-2 and in interim named nCOVID-19 by the World Health Organization (WHO). The contagion has sparked a war against humanity with the current global toll of 1,12,241 human lives. Till date no definitive treatment against SARS-CoV-2 has been established. Similar picture of lack of licensed definitive therapy can be traced back to Ebola outbreak and the WHO directed for considering convalescent plasma (CP) therapy for its control. The history of CP as therapeutics dates back to 20th century which renders a scope for consideration in the management of nCOVID-19. Experience from prior outbreak of SARS-CoV-1 has shown that convalescent sera contain neutralizing antibodies to the relevant virus. The core principle of this passive antibody therapy is based on retrieving virus neutralizing antibodies from recovered patients with all ethical considerations and using it as prophylaxis in exposed cases or as therapy in infected patients. It is more effective as prophylaxis than as a treatment modality for the disease. However, when used in early phase of disease, the evidences have reported a decrease in mortality. Cocktails with monoclonal antibodies have also been reported beneficial, but calls for establishing pros and cons in further detail. The sole objective of this review article is to explain how and why the convalescent plasma can serve as a plausible therapeutic modality. In addition, it renders a bird’s eye view on current clinical trials for the same.","PeriodicalId":15375,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical trials","volume":"40 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2167-0870.20.10.409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

The world is battling a pandemic caused by the newly emerged strain of coronavirus; upon identification SARSCoV-2 and in interim named nCOVID-19 by the World Health Organization (WHO). The contagion has sparked a war against humanity with the current global toll of 1,12,241 human lives. Till date no definitive treatment against SARS-CoV-2 has been established. Similar picture of lack of licensed definitive therapy can be traced back to Ebola outbreak and the WHO directed for considering convalescent plasma (CP) therapy for its control. The history of CP as therapeutics dates back to 20th century which renders a scope for consideration in the management of nCOVID-19. Experience from prior outbreak of SARS-CoV-1 has shown that convalescent sera contain neutralizing antibodies to the relevant virus. The core principle of this passive antibody therapy is based on retrieving virus neutralizing antibodies from recovered patients with all ethical considerations and using it as prophylaxis in exposed cases or as therapy in infected patients. It is more effective as prophylaxis than as a treatment modality for the disease. However, when used in early phase of disease, the evidences have reported a decrease in mortality. Cocktails with monoclonal antibodies have also been reported beneficial, but calls for establishing pros and cons in further detail. The sole objective of this review article is to explain how and why the convalescent plasma can serve as a plausible therapeutic modality. In addition, it renders a bird’s eye view on current clinical trials for the same.
恢复期血浆作为一种似是而非的治疗选择:综述
世界正在与新出现的冠状病毒引起的大流行作斗争;经鉴定为SARSCoV-2,世界卫生组织暂时将其命名为nCOVID-19。这种传染病引发了一场反人类的战争,目前全球共有112241人死亡。迄今为止,尚未确定针对SARS-CoV-2的明确治疗方法。缺乏获得许可的明确治疗方法的类似情况可追溯到埃博拉疫情,世卫组织指示考虑将恢复期血浆(CP)治疗作为其控制。CP作为治疗药物的历史可以追溯到20世纪,这为covid -19的管理提供了一个值得考虑的范围。以往SARS-CoV-1爆发的经验表明,恢复期血清中含有针对相关病毒的中和抗体。这种被动抗体治疗的核心原则是基于从康复患者中提取病毒中和抗体,并将其用作暴露病例的预防或感染患者的治疗。它作为一种预防方法比作为一种治疗方法更有效。然而,当在疾病的早期阶段使用时,有证据表明死亡率降低。单克隆抗体鸡尾酒也被报道是有益的,但需要进一步详细地确定利弊。这篇综述文章的唯一目的是解释恢复期血浆如何以及为什么可以作为一种合理的治疗方式。此外,它还提供了目前的临床试验的鸟瞰图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信