Physical and Mechanical Properties of Concrete using Recycled Clay Bricks as Coarse Aggregate

Mohammad Yasir Abdul Hakim, Mohamed El-Zeadani, S. A. Osman
{"title":"Physical and Mechanical Properties of Concrete using Recycled Clay Bricks as Coarse Aggregate","authors":"Mohammad Yasir Abdul Hakim, Mohamed El-Zeadani, S. A. Osman","doi":"10.3844/ajeassp.2022.88.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Rising construction waste due to demolition work, natural disasters, and development is becoming a prominent issue. To tackle this, Recycled Crushed Brick Masonry Aggregate (RCBMA) can be an ideal replacement for the limited Natural Coarse Aggregates (NCA) in the production of concrete, potentially assisting in managing construction waste and reducing the depletion of NCA. As such, this study focused on assessing the suitability and establishing the optimum percentage of RCBMA as a replacement for NCA in concrete. To do so, five different concrete mixes were prepared where NCA was replaced by RCBMA at different percentages (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100%). The effect of RCBMA on concrete was studied and analyzed for physical and mechanical properties including concrete slump, compressive strength, density, water absorption, and flexural strength. From the results, the workability of the concrete mixes were reduced by as much as 21.8 and 44.9% at 50 and 100% RCBMA replacement, respectively. Meanwhile, the water absorption increased with higher RCBMA replacement from 1.43 at 0% replacement to 7.76 at 100% replacement, indicating greater porosity at higher RCBMA replacement levels. The compressive strength was reduced with a rise in RCBMA replacement due to the lighter weight of RCBMA as compared to NCA. This reduction was as much as 48.72 and 63.14 at 50 and 100% RCBMA replacement of NCA. The same can be said about the flexural strength and density of concrete, where higher RCBMA replacement led to lower flexural strength and concrete density. It was concluded that a 25% RCBMA replacement does not severely affect the workability and mechanical strength of concrete (16.8 and 17% reduction in compressive and flexural strengths, respectively, as compared to the control samples) and thus can be used for structural concrete applications. The findings from this study illustrate the possibility of using RCBMA as a partial replacement for NCA, potentially assisting in reducing construction and demolition waste sustainably.","PeriodicalId":7425,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences","volume":"164 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2022.88.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

: Rising construction waste due to demolition work, natural disasters, and development is becoming a prominent issue. To tackle this, Recycled Crushed Brick Masonry Aggregate (RCBMA) can be an ideal replacement for the limited Natural Coarse Aggregates (NCA) in the production of concrete, potentially assisting in managing construction waste and reducing the depletion of NCA. As such, this study focused on assessing the suitability and establishing the optimum percentage of RCBMA as a replacement for NCA in concrete. To do so, five different concrete mixes were prepared where NCA was replaced by RCBMA at different percentages (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100%). The effect of RCBMA on concrete was studied and analyzed for physical and mechanical properties including concrete slump, compressive strength, density, water absorption, and flexural strength. From the results, the workability of the concrete mixes were reduced by as much as 21.8 and 44.9% at 50 and 100% RCBMA replacement, respectively. Meanwhile, the water absorption increased with higher RCBMA replacement from 1.43 at 0% replacement to 7.76 at 100% replacement, indicating greater porosity at higher RCBMA replacement levels. The compressive strength was reduced with a rise in RCBMA replacement due to the lighter weight of RCBMA as compared to NCA. This reduction was as much as 48.72 and 63.14 at 50 and 100% RCBMA replacement of NCA. The same can be said about the flexural strength and density of concrete, where higher RCBMA replacement led to lower flexural strength and concrete density. It was concluded that a 25% RCBMA replacement does not severely affect the workability and mechanical strength of concrete (16.8 and 17% reduction in compressive and flexural strengths, respectively, as compared to the control samples) and thus can be used for structural concrete applications. The findings from this study illustrate the possibility of using RCBMA as a partial replacement for NCA, potentially assisting in reducing construction and demolition waste sustainably.
再生粘土砖粗骨料混凝土的物理力学性能
由于拆迁、自然灾害和开发等原因造成的建筑垃圾日益增多,成为一个突出的问题。为了解决这个问题,再生碎砖砌体骨料(RCBMA)可以成为混凝土生产中有限的天然粗骨料(NCA)的理想替代品,可能有助于管理建筑垃圾并减少NCA的消耗。因此,本研究侧重于评估RCBMA作为混凝土中NCA替代品的适用性并确定其最佳百分比。为此,制备了五种不同的混凝土混合物,其中NCA以不同的百分比(0、25、50、75和100%)被RCBMA取代。研究分析了RCBMA对混凝土坍落度、抗压强度、密度、吸水率、抗弯强度等物理力学性能的影响。结果表明,当RCBMA用量为50%和100%时,混凝土的和易性分别降低了21.8%和44.9%。同时,随着RCBMA替代量的增加,孔隙率从0%替代时的1.43增加到100%替代时的7.76,表明RCBMA替代量的增加孔隙率越大。与NCA相比,RCBMA的重量更轻,抗压强度随着RCBMA替换量的增加而降低。在50%和100% RCBMA替代NCA时,这一减少幅度分别为48.72和63.14。混凝土的抗折强度和密度也是如此,RCBMA替代量越大,混凝土的抗折强度和密度越低。结论是,25%的RCBMA替代品不会严重影响混凝土的和易性和机械强度(与对照样品相比,抗压强度和抗折强度分别降低16.8%和17%),因此可以用于结构混凝土应用。本研究的结果表明,使用RCBMA作为NCA的部分替代品的可能性,可能有助于可持续地减少建筑和拆除废物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信