{"title":"Gender, Science, Politics and Geographies of the City","authors":"D. Sibley","doi":"10.1080/09663699550022071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most histories of urban studies represent the theoretical statements of the Chicago School of Sociology in the 1920s as foundational. However, perspectives on sociospatial relationships associated with Robert Park and his co-workers could be recognised as a distinctively masculinised form of knowledge, centred on science, objectivity and distancing. Contemporaneous research on the city by women in the Chicago School of Social Service Administration has been ignored by (predominantly male) urban geographers and sociologists. I argue that this neglect can be explained by a downgrading of knowledge produced by these women in relation to scientific sociology, by the context of political radicalism within which the research was produced, and by subsequent developments in urban studies which were unsympathetic to their ideas. In making this case, I first identify significant theoretical contributions made by women in the School of Social Service Administration. Second, the marginalisation of the women's researc...","PeriodicalId":51414,"journal":{"name":"Gender Place and Culture","volume":"102 1","pages":"37-50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"1995-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Place and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09663699550022071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20
Abstract
Most histories of urban studies represent the theoretical statements of the Chicago School of Sociology in the 1920s as foundational. However, perspectives on sociospatial relationships associated with Robert Park and his co-workers could be recognised as a distinctively masculinised form of knowledge, centred on science, objectivity and distancing. Contemporaneous research on the city by women in the Chicago School of Social Service Administration has been ignored by (predominantly male) urban geographers and sociologists. I argue that this neglect can be explained by a downgrading of knowledge produced by these women in relation to scientific sociology, by the context of political radicalism within which the research was produced, and by subsequent developments in urban studies which were unsympathetic to their ideas. In making this case, I first identify significant theoretical contributions made by women in the School of Social Service Administration. Second, the marginalisation of the women's researc...
大多数城市研究的历史都以20世纪20年代芝加哥社会学派的理论陈述为基础。然而,与Robert Park和他的同事有关的社会空间关系的观点可以被认为是一种独特的男性化的知识形式,以科学、客观性和距离为中心。芝加哥社会服务管理学院(Chicago School of Social Service Administration)女性对城市的同期研究一直被城市地理学家和社会学家(以男性为主)所忽视。我认为,这种忽视可以解释为这些女性在科学社会学方面产生的知识的降级,研究产生的政治激进主义背景,以及随后城市研究的发展对她们的观点不感兴趣。为了证明这一点,我首先确定了社会服务管理学院的女性做出的重要理论贡献。第二,女性研究的边缘化……
期刊介绍:
The aim of Gender, Place and Culture is to provide a forum for debate in human geography and related disciplines on theoretically-informed research concerned with gender issues. It also seeks to highlight the significance of such research for feminism and women"s studies. The editors seek articles based on primary research that address: the particularities and intersections of gender, race, ethnicity, age, (dis)ability, sexuality, class, culture and place; feminist, anti-racist, critical and radical geographies of space, place, nature and the environment; feminist geographies of difference, resistance, marginality and/or spatial negotiation; and, critical methodology.