Dose Assessment in Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer after Metal Artifact Reduction in Neusoft-Philips Corporation CT Scanner: A Clinical Study

Q3 Health Professions
A. Abedini, K. Ebrahimnejad Gorji, N. Ghaemian, Sakineh Soleimani Varaki, M. Davoudi, Alaba Tolulope Agbele, A. Shabestani Monfared
{"title":"Dose Assessment in Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer after Metal Artifact Reduction in Neusoft-Philips Corporation CT Scanner: A Clinical Study","authors":"A. Abedini, K. Ebrahimnejad Gorji, N. Ghaemian, Sakineh Soleimani Varaki, M. Davoudi, Alaba Tolulope Agbele, A. Shabestani Monfared","doi":"10.18502/fbt.v10i1.11510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Metal artifacts cause to increase in the uncorrected dose evaluation during radiotherapy planning. This study aimed to evaluate the probable difference of the dose parameters calculated by the Treatment Planning System (TPS) in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer before and after metal artifact correction in Neusoft-Philips Corporation Computed Tomography (CT) images. \nMaterials and Methods: In the present study, the radiotherapy planning of the head and neck cancer from thirty patients was first performed on the CT default images with dental implants. The same processes were applied after performing a body standard metal kernel on the CT images to reduce the metal artifacts. The Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) and Organ At Risks (OARs) were contoured on the CT slices. The dosimetric parameters (mean, minimum, and maximum) for the GTV and OARs (eyes and spinal cord) were obtained for both sets of CT images (defaults and filtered). Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to calculate the probability dose variations between the two sets. \nResults: There are significant differences in several dose parameters between the default and filtered CT images (P-value < 0.05). These dosimetric parameters are related to the GTV (mean dose), spinal cord (minimum and mean doses), right eye (maximum dose), as well as left eye (mean dose). The average range of dose differences between the default and filtered images was obtained; 1.12%-3.11% for the GTV as well as 0.22%-12.05% for the OARs. \nConclusion: Based on the results, the body standard metal kernel can cause a significant difference in several dosimetric parameters of GTV and OARs during the radiotherapy of head and neck cancer. Therefore, it is recommended to make a metal artifact correction on CT images for accurate dose calculation before designing a treatment plan.","PeriodicalId":34203,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v10i1.11510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Metal artifacts cause to increase in the uncorrected dose evaluation during radiotherapy planning. This study aimed to evaluate the probable difference of the dose parameters calculated by the Treatment Planning System (TPS) in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer before and after metal artifact correction in Neusoft-Philips Corporation Computed Tomography (CT) images. Materials and Methods: In the present study, the radiotherapy planning of the head and neck cancer from thirty patients was first performed on the CT default images with dental implants. The same processes were applied after performing a body standard metal kernel on the CT images to reduce the metal artifacts. The Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) and Organ At Risks (OARs) were contoured on the CT slices. The dosimetric parameters (mean, minimum, and maximum) for the GTV and OARs (eyes and spinal cord) were obtained for both sets of CT images (defaults and filtered). Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to calculate the probability dose variations between the two sets. Results: There are significant differences in several dose parameters between the default and filtered CT images (P-value < 0.05). These dosimetric parameters are related to the GTV (mean dose), spinal cord (minimum and mean doses), right eye (maximum dose), as well as left eye (mean dose). The average range of dose differences between the default and filtered images was obtained; 1.12%-3.11% for the GTV as well as 0.22%-12.05% for the OARs. Conclusion: Based on the results, the body standard metal kernel can cause a significant difference in several dosimetric parameters of GTV and OARs during the radiotherapy of head and neck cancer. Therefore, it is recommended to make a metal artifact correction on CT images for accurate dose calculation before designing a treatment plan.
东软-飞利浦公司CT机金属伪影复位后头颈部肿瘤放疗剂量评估的临床研究
目的:金属伪影导致放疗计划中未校正剂量评估的增加。本研究旨在评价治疗计划系统(TPS)计算的剂量参数在东软-飞利浦公司计算机断层扫描(CT)图像中金属伪影校正前后的可能差异。材料与方法:本研究首先对30例头颈癌患者的CT默认图像进行了种植牙的放疗计划。在对CT图像执行体标准金属核后应用相同的处理以减少金属伪影。在CT切片上绘制肿瘤总体积(GTV)和危险器官(OARs)轮廓。获得两组CT图像(默认值和过滤值)的GTV和OARs(眼睛和脊髓)的剂量学参数(平均值、最小值和最大值)。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验计算两组间剂量变化的概率。结果:CT默认图像与过滤图像在多个剂量参数上存在显著差异(p值< 0.05)。这些剂量学参数与GTV(平均剂量)、脊髓(最小和平均剂量)、右眼(最大剂量)以及左眼(平均剂量)有关。得到了默认图像和过滤图像的剂量差的平均范围;GTV为1.12%-3.11%,OARs为0.22%-12.05%。结论:体表标准金属核在头颈癌放疗中对GTV和OARs的若干剂量学参数有显著影响。因此,建议在设计治疗方案前,对CT图像进行金属伪影校正,以便准确计算剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies
Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信