Modelling Potential Geological CO2 Storage Combined with CO2-Plume Geothermal CPG Energy Extraction in Switzerland

Kevin P. Hau, F. Games, R. Lathion, M. Saar
{"title":"Modelling Potential Geological CO2 Storage Combined with CO2-Plume Geothermal CPG Energy Extraction in Switzerland","authors":"Kevin P. Hau, F. Games, R. Lathion, M. Saar","doi":"10.2523/iptc-22254-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n For many CO2-emitting industrial sectors, such as the cement and chemical industry, Carbon, Capture and Storage (CCS) will be necessary to reach any set climate target. CCS on its own is a very cost-intensive technology. Instead of considering CO2 as a waste to be disposed of, we propose to consider CO2 as a resource. The utilisation of CO2 in so-called CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) systems generates revenue by extracting geothermal energy, while permanently storing CO2 in the geological subsurface.\n To the best of our knowledge, this pioneer investigation is the first CCUS simulation feasibility study in Switzerland. Among others, we investigated the concept of injecting and circulating CO2 for geothermal power generation purposes from potential CO2 storage formations (saline reservoirs) in the Western part of the Swiss Molasse Basin (\"Muschelkalk\" and \"Buntsandstein\" formation).\n Old 2D-seismic data indicates a potential anticline structure in proximity of the Eclépens heat anomaly. Essentially, this conceptual study helps assessing it's potential CO2 storage capacity range and will be beneficial for future economical assessments. The interpretation of the intersected 2D seismic profiles reveals an apparent anticline structure that was integrated on a geological model with a footprint of 4.35 × 4.05 km2.\n For studying the dynamic reservoir behaviour during the CO2 circulation, we considered: (1) the petrophysical rock properties uncertainty range, (2) the injection and physics of a two-phase (CO2 and brine) fluid system, including the relative permeability characterisation, fluid model composition, the residual and solubility CO2 trapping, and (3) the thermophysical properties of resident-formation brine and the injected CO2 gas.\n Our study represents a first-order estimation of the expected CO2 storage capacity range at a possible anticline structure in two potential Triassic reservoir formations in the Western part of the Swiss Molasse Basin. Additionally, we assessed the effect of different well locations on CO2 injection operations.\n Our currently still-ongoing study will investigate production rates and resulting well flow regimes in a conceptual CO2 production well for geothermal energy production in the future. Nonetheless, our preliminary results indicate that, under ideal conditions, both reservoirs combined can store more than 8 Mt of CO2 over multiple decades of CCUS operation. From our results, we can clearly identify limiting factors on the overall storage capacity, such as for example the reservoir fluid pressure distribution and well operation constraints.","PeriodicalId":11027,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, February 23, 2022","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, February 23, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22254-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For many CO2-emitting industrial sectors, such as the cement and chemical industry, Carbon, Capture and Storage (CCS) will be necessary to reach any set climate target. CCS on its own is a very cost-intensive technology. Instead of considering CO2 as a waste to be disposed of, we propose to consider CO2 as a resource. The utilisation of CO2 in so-called CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) systems generates revenue by extracting geothermal energy, while permanently storing CO2 in the geological subsurface. To the best of our knowledge, this pioneer investigation is the first CCUS simulation feasibility study in Switzerland. Among others, we investigated the concept of injecting and circulating CO2 for geothermal power generation purposes from potential CO2 storage formations (saline reservoirs) in the Western part of the Swiss Molasse Basin ("Muschelkalk" and "Buntsandstein" formation). Old 2D-seismic data indicates a potential anticline structure in proximity of the Eclépens heat anomaly. Essentially, this conceptual study helps assessing it's potential CO2 storage capacity range and will be beneficial for future economical assessments. The interpretation of the intersected 2D seismic profiles reveals an apparent anticline structure that was integrated on a geological model with a footprint of 4.35 × 4.05 km2. For studying the dynamic reservoir behaviour during the CO2 circulation, we considered: (1) the petrophysical rock properties uncertainty range, (2) the injection and physics of a two-phase (CO2 and brine) fluid system, including the relative permeability characterisation, fluid model composition, the residual and solubility CO2 trapping, and (3) the thermophysical properties of resident-formation brine and the injected CO2 gas. Our study represents a first-order estimation of the expected CO2 storage capacity range at a possible anticline structure in two potential Triassic reservoir formations in the Western part of the Swiss Molasse Basin. Additionally, we assessed the effect of different well locations on CO2 injection operations. Our currently still-ongoing study will investigate production rates and resulting well flow regimes in a conceptual CO2 production well for geothermal energy production in the future. Nonetheless, our preliminary results indicate that, under ideal conditions, both reservoirs combined can store more than 8 Mt of CO2 over multiple decades of CCUS operation. From our results, we can clearly identify limiting factors on the overall storage capacity, such as for example the reservoir fluid pressure distribution and well operation constraints.
模拟潜在的地质二氧化碳储存结合CO2-羽地热CPG能源提取在瑞士
对于许多二氧化碳排放的工业部门,如水泥和化学工业,碳捕获和储存(CCS)对于实现任何设定的气候目标都是必要的。CCS本身就是一项成本非常高的技术。我们建议将二氧化碳视为一种资源,而不是将其视为一种需要处理的废物。在所谓的CO2羽地热(CPG)系统中利用CO2通过提取地热能产生收益,同时将CO2永久储存在地质地下。据我们所知,这项开创性的调查是瑞士第一个CCUS模拟可行性研究。其中,我们研究了瑞士Molasse盆地西部(Muschelkalk和Buntsandstein地层)潜在的二氧化碳储存层(含盐储层)注入和循环二氧化碳用于地热发电的概念。旧的二维地震数据表明,在eclsamuens热异常附近有一个潜在的背斜构造。从本质上讲,这一概念性研究有助于评估其潜在的二氧化碳储存能力范围,并将有利于未来的经济评估。对相交的二维地震剖面的解释揭示了一个明显的背斜结构,该结构被整合到一个面积为4.35 × 4.05 km2的地质模型上。为了研究CO2循环过程中储层的动态行为,我们考虑了:(1)岩石物理性质的不确定性范围;(2)两相(CO2和盐水)流体系统的注入和物理特性,包括相对渗透率特征、流体模型组成、残余和溶解度CO2捕获;(3)驻留地层盐水和注入CO2气体的热物理特性。本研究代表了瑞士Molasse盆地西部两个潜在三叠系储层在可能的背斜构造下的预期CO2储存容量范围的一阶估计。此外,我们还评估了不同井位对CO2注入作业的影响。我们目前仍在进行的研究将调查未来用于地热能源生产的概念性二氧化碳生产井的产量和井流状况。尽管如此,我们的初步结果表明,在理想条件下,两个储层加起来可以在CCUS运行数十年的时间里储存超过800万吨的二氧化碳。从我们的研究结果中,我们可以清楚地识别出总体存储容量的限制因素,例如储层流体压力分布和井的操作约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信