Better Hit the Nail on the Head than Beat around the Bush: Removing Protected Attributes with a Single Projection

P. Haghighatkhah, Antske Fokkens, Pia Sommerauer, B. Speckmann, Kevin Verbeek
{"title":"Better Hit the Nail on the Head than Beat around the Bush: Removing Protected Attributes with a Single Projection","authors":"P. Haghighatkhah, Antske Fokkens, Pia Sommerauer, B. Speckmann, Kevin Verbeek","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2212.04273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bias elimination and recent probing studies attempt to remove specific information from embedding spaces. Here it is important to remove as much of the target information as possible, while preserving any other information present. INLP is a popular recent method which removes specific information through iterative nullspace projections.Multiple iterations, however, increase the risk that information other than the target is negatively affected.We introduce two methods that find a single targeted projection: Mean Projection (MP, more efficient) and Tukey Median Projection (TMP, with theoretical guarantees). Our comparison between MP and INLP shows that (1) one MP projection removes linear separability based on the target and (2) MP has less impact on the overall space.Further analysis shows that applying random projections after MP leads to the same overall effects on the embedding space as the multiple projections of INLP. Applying one targeted (MP) projection hence is methodologically cleaner than applying multiple (INLP) projections that introduce random effects.","PeriodicalId":74540,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing","volume":"53 1","pages":"8395-8416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.04273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Bias elimination and recent probing studies attempt to remove specific information from embedding spaces. Here it is important to remove as much of the target information as possible, while preserving any other information present. INLP is a popular recent method which removes specific information through iterative nullspace projections.Multiple iterations, however, increase the risk that information other than the target is negatively affected.We introduce two methods that find a single targeted projection: Mean Projection (MP, more efficient) and Tukey Median Projection (TMP, with theoretical guarantees). Our comparison between MP and INLP shows that (1) one MP projection removes linear separability based on the target and (2) MP has less impact on the overall space.Further analysis shows that applying random projections after MP leads to the same overall effects on the embedding space as the multiple projections of INLP. Applying one targeted (MP) projection hence is methodologically cleaner than applying multiple (INLP) projections that introduce random effects.
切中要害,不要拐弯抹角:用一次投射移除受保护的属性
偏见消除和最近的探索研究试图从嵌入空间中去除特定信息。在这里,重要的是要尽可能多地删除目标信息,同时保留现有的任何其他信息。INLP是最近流行的一种通过迭代零空间投影去除特定信息的方法。然而,多次迭代会增加目标以外的信息受到负面影响的风险。我们介绍了寻找单个目标投影的两种方法:均值投影(MP,更有效)和Tukey中值投影(TMP,有理论保证)。我们对MP和INLP的比较表明:(1)一个MP投影消除了基于目标的线性可分性;(2)MP对整体空间的影响较小。进一步分析表明,在MP后应用随机投影对嵌入空间的总体影响与INLP的多次投影相同。因此,应用一个目标(MP)投影比应用引入随机效应的多个(INLP)投影在方法上更干净。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信