Portal vein reconstruction in high risk infantile liver transplantation

M. Feng, Chengpeng Zhong, B. Qiu, P. Wan, Lei-Lei Xia, Yi Luo, L. Gu, J. Chi, Ye-feng Lu, Jianjun Zhang, Q. Xia
{"title":"Portal vein reconstruction in high risk infantile liver transplantation","authors":"M. Feng, Chengpeng Zhong, B. Qiu, P. Wan, Lei-Lei Xia, Yi Luo, L. Gu, J. Chi, Ye-feng Lu, Jianjun Zhang, Q. Xia","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the experience of infantile liver transplantation, reconstructing portal vein (PV) and avoid the higher incidence of portal vein low flow and complications. \n \n \nMethods \nThe clinical data were reviewed for 152 infantile liver transplantations performed by a single surgery group. And 114 cases with PV risk factors underwent customized PV reconstructions. All of them were diagnosed as cholestatic liver diseases and 106 (93%) belonged to biliary atresia. Forty-two cases (36%) had 2 or more risk factors. \n \n \nResults \nMost cases (n=106, 93%) underwent living donor transplantations using lateral left graft while another 8 cases had deceased donor transplantations. Four types of PV reconstructions were adopted based upon individual conditions: left/right branch of PV trunk (n=103), autogenous patch PV venoplastic reconstruction (n=3), duct-to-duct of PV trunk (n=5) and donor PV duct-to-recipient confluence of SMV/CV and SV (n=3). Graft size reduction was performed when GRWR>4.5% (n=16). During a median follow-up period of 6.5 (1.5-13) months, there were 3 LPVF (2.6%), 2PVS (1.7%) and 1 PVT (0.8%). Three LPVF cases was corrected by PV stenting, two cases of PVS were stable after anticoagulation therapy while one PVT case undergoing thromboectomy plus PV stenting resumed a normal PV flow. \n \n \nConclusions \nPV reconstruction of high-risk infants require comprehensive risk evaluations, precise surgical skills and customized strategies. For PV complications, stenting is both safe and feasible. \n \n \nKey words: \nLiver transplantation; Portal vein; Anastomosis, surgical","PeriodicalId":9885,"journal":{"name":"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.07.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To explore the experience of infantile liver transplantation, reconstructing portal vein (PV) and avoid the higher incidence of portal vein low flow and complications. Methods The clinical data were reviewed for 152 infantile liver transplantations performed by a single surgery group. And 114 cases with PV risk factors underwent customized PV reconstructions. All of them were diagnosed as cholestatic liver diseases and 106 (93%) belonged to biliary atresia. Forty-two cases (36%) had 2 or more risk factors. Results Most cases (n=106, 93%) underwent living donor transplantations using lateral left graft while another 8 cases had deceased donor transplantations. Four types of PV reconstructions were adopted based upon individual conditions: left/right branch of PV trunk (n=103), autogenous patch PV venoplastic reconstruction (n=3), duct-to-duct of PV trunk (n=5) and donor PV duct-to-recipient confluence of SMV/CV and SV (n=3). Graft size reduction was performed when GRWR>4.5% (n=16). During a median follow-up period of 6.5 (1.5-13) months, there were 3 LPVF (2.6%), 2PVS (1.7%) and 1 PVT (0.8%). Three LPVF cases was corrected by PV stenting, two cases of PVS were stable after anticoagulation therapy while one PVT case undergoing thromboectomy plus PV stenting resumed a normal PV flow. Conclusions PV reconstruction of high-risk infants require comprehensive risk evaluations, precise surgical skills and customized strategies. For PV complications, stenting is both safe and feasible. Key words: Liver transplantation; Portal vein; Anastomosis, surgical
门静脉重建在高危婴儿肝移植中的应用
目的探讨小儿肝移植重建门静脉的经验,避免门静脉低流量及并发症的高发生率。方法回顾性分析单手术组152例小儿肝移植的临床资料。114例有PV危险因素的患者进行了定制的PV重建。全部诊断为胆汁淤积性肝病,其中胆道闭锁106例(93%)。42例(36%)有2种或2种以上的危险因素。结果左侧外侧供体活体移植最多(106例,93%),死亡供体移植8例。根据个体情况采用4种类型的PV重建:PV主干左/右分支重建(n=103)、自体补片PV静脉成形术重建(n=3)、PV主干导管-导管重建(n=5)和SMV/CV和SV供体PV导管-受体合流(n=3)。当GRWR>4.5%时进行移植物缩小(n=16)。在中位随访6.5(1.5-13)个月期间,有3例LPVF(2.6%), 2例pvs(1.7%)和1例PVT(0.8%)。3例LPVF经冠脉搭桥术矫正,2例冠脉搭桥术抗凝治疗后稳定,1例冠脉搭桥术后冠脉血流恢复正常。结论高危儿PV重建需要全面的风险评估、精确的手术技巧和个性化的策略。对于PV并发症,支架置入既安全又可行。关键词:肝移植;门静脉;吻合,手术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信