Standardized Postoperative Recovery Reduces in-Hospital Stay After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

Anna Katrine Nyman Rasmussen, M. Larsen, A. Ainsworth
{"title":"Standardized Postoperative Recovery Reduces in-Hospital Stay After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy","authors":"Anna Katrine Nyman Rasmussen, M. Larsen, A. Ainsworth","doi":"10.11648/J.JS.20210902.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study aims to examine if a standardized enhanced recovery program (ERP) could reduce the length of stay (LOS) after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIO) compared to the earlier applied recovery program without increasing the risk of postoperative complications and readmissions. Methods: Retrospective study of patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer who have had an uncomplicated postoperative stay following MIO. Patients had followed two different postoperative recovery programs according to their year of surgery (2016 versus 2018). Results: 48 patients in 2016 and 42 patients in 2018 were included. Patients were comparable on demographic factors. The median LOS was reduced from 9 days in 2016 to 8 days in 2018 (p 0.05) between the two groups in the risk of complications (Clavien-Dindo degree 0-2). Two patients in 2016 (4.2%) and two patients in 2018 (4.8%) were readmitted within 7 days after discharge (not significant). There was no in-hospital mortality or 30-day mortality in either of the two groups. Conclusion: The introduction of an ERP at our institution reduced the median postoperative stay after MIO by one day without increasing the risk of complications and readmittance. Further reduction might be obtained if oral feeding is allowed earlier.","PeriodicalId":101237,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Surgery","volume":"65 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.JS.20210902.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: This study aims to examine if a standardized enhanced recovery program (ERP) could reduce the length of stay (LOS) after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIO) compared to the earlier applied recovery program without increasing the risk of postoperative complications and readmissions. Methods: Retrospective study of patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer who have had an uncomplicated postoperative stay following MIO. Patients had followed two different postoperative recovery programs according to their year of surgery (2016 versus 2018). Results: 48 patients in 2016 and 42 patients in 2018 were included. Patients were comparable on demographic factors. The median LOS was reduced from 9 days in 2016 to 8 days in 2018 (p 0.05) between the two groups in the risk of complications (Clavien-Dindo degree 0-2). Two patients in 2016 (4.2%) and two patients in 2018 (4.8%) were readmitted within 7 days after discharge (not significant). There was no in-hospital mortality or 30-day mortality in either of the two groups. Conclusion: The introduction of an ERP at our institution reduced the median postoperative stay after MIO by one day without increasing the risk of complications and readmittance. Further reduction might be obtained if oral feeding is allowed earlier.
标准化术后恢复减少微创食管切除术后住院时间
背景:本研究旨在探讨与早期应用的恢复方案相比,标准化的增强恢复方案(ERP)是否可以减少微创食管切除术(MIO)后的住院时间(LOS),而不会增加术后并发症和再入院的风险。方法:回顾性分析食管癌和胃食管结癌在MIO术后无并发症住院的患者。根据手术年份(2016年和2018年),患者遵循了两种不同的术后恢复计划。结果:2016年纳入48例,2018年纳入42例。患者在人口统计学因素上具有可比性。两组并发症风险(Clavien-Dindo度0-2)的中位LOS从2016年的9天减少到2018年的8天(p 0.05)。2016年2例(4.2%)和2018年2例(4.8%)出院后7天内再次入院(无统计学意义)。两组均无住院死亡率或30天死亡率。结论:我院引入ERP后,MIO术后中位住院时间缩短1天,且未增加并发症和再入院的风险。如果早期允许口服喂养,可能会进一步减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信