WEAPONIZING THE COVID-19 VACCINE: THE GEOPOLITICAL STRUGGLE

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS
Joseph Pelzman, Ofra Bazel-Shoham
{"title":"WEAPONIZING THE COVID-19 VACCINE: THE GEOPOLITICAL STRUGGLE","authors":"Joseph Pelzman, Ofra Bazel-Shoham","doi":"10.1142/s2194565922500099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the world continues to navigate a global pandemic that ignores national borders, it is not surprising to find a divide between the interests of vaccine-producing countries — and their entire supply chain networks for intermediates and raw materials — and countries that are primarily reliant on these producers for their vaccine consumption. This paper puts this debate in the context of a multi country strategic game where the major players have been able to produce a vaccine for COVID-19 and control the distribution of the vaccine and all its components. To address this issue of sovereign players, some have raised the possibility of a GATT/WTO intervention into COVID-19 vaccine sale and distribution. In addition, a legal battle is taking shape over lucrative patent rights for COVID-19 vaccines, with drug companies pitted against each other and government and academic scientists over who invented what. At the heart of the disputes is the billion-dollar question: Who can claim to have invented important elements of the COVID-19 vaccines? In June 2022, the WTO struck deals on a partial patent waiver for COVID-19 vaccines. Most observers believe that this change to the intellectual property rules will have limited impact on actual production for now because a current surplus of vaccines globally means there is little demand among vaccine makers to increase output. The implications are clear. The WTO compromise has allowed the existence of high hurdles for exports of products made under such a license. Given the limited WTO compromise agreement there are several options available to solve the problem of lack of access to the COVID-19 vaccine consuming nations at this stage. First, the US Supreme Court could invalidate each of the pharmaceutical companies’ patent requests. Second, individuals could file legal actions designed to disgorge the monopoly revenue of these pharmaceutical companies. If no legal action is taken, along these lines, and the WTO compromise is insufficient to solve the COVID-19 vaccine shortages in the developing world, then the developed countries will be opening the gate to PRC delivery of their COVID-19 vaccine to the entire developing and emerging markets.","PeriodicalId":44015,"journal":{"name":"Global Economy Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Economy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2194565922500099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the world continues to navigate a global pandemic that ignores national borders, it is not surprising to find a divide between the interests of vaccine-producing countries — and their entire supply chain networks for intermediates and raw materials — and countries that are primarily reliant on these producers for their vaccine consumption. This paper puts this debate in the context of a multi country strategic game where the major players have been able to produce a vaccine for COVID-19 and control the distribution of the vaccine and all its components. To address this issue of sovereign players, some have raised the possibility of a GATT/WTO intervention into COVID-19 vaccine sale and distribution. In addition, a legal battle is taking shape over lucrative patent rights for COVID-19 vaccines, with drug companies pitted against each other and government and academic scientists over who invented what. At the heart of the disputes is the billion-dollar question: Who can claim to have invented important elements of the COVID-19 vaccines? In June 2022, the WTO struck deals on a partial patent waiver for COVID-19 vaccines. Most observers believe that this change to the intellectual property rules will have limited impact on actual production for now because a current surplus of vaccines globally means there is little demand among vaccine makers to increase output. The implications are clear. The WTO compromise has allowed the existence of high hurdles for exports of products made under such a license. Given the limited WTO compromise agreement there are several options available to solve the problem of lack of access to the COVID-19 vaccine consuming nations at this stage. First, the US Supreme Court could invalidate each of the pharmaceutical companies’ patent requests. Second, individuals could file legal actions designed to disgorge the monopoly revenue of these pharmaceutical companies. If no legal action is taken, along these lines, and the WTO compromise is insufficient to solve the COVID-19 vaccine shortages in the developing world, then the developed countries will be opening the gate to PRC delivery of their COVID-19 vaccine to the entire developing and emerging markets.
武器化COVID-19疫苗:地缘政治斗争
随着世界继续应对一场无视国界的全球大流行,疫苗生产国及其整个中间体和原材料供应链网络的利益与主要依赖这些生产国进行疫苗消费的国家之间出现分歧并不奇怪。本文将这一辩论置于多国战略博弈的背景下,其中主要参与者能够生产COVID-19疫苗并控制疫苗及其所有组成部分的分发。为了解决主权参与者的问题,一些人提出了关贸总协定/世贸组织干预COVID-19疫苗销售和分销的可能性。此外,围绕利润丰厚的COVID-19疫苗专利权的法律争夺战正在形成,制药公司之间、政府和学术科学家之间围绕谁发明了什么展开了激烈的竞争。争议的核心是一个价值数十亿美元的问题:谁能声称发明了COVID-19疫苗的重要成分?2022年6月,世界贸易组织就COVID-19疫苗的部分专利豁免达成了协议。大多数观察人士认为,这一知识产权规则的变化目前对实际生产的影响有限,因为目前全球疫苗过剩意味着疫苗生产商几乎没有增加产量的需求。其含义是显而易见的。世贸组织的妥协使得在这种许可下生产的产品的出口存在很高的障碍。鉴于世贸组织的妥协协议有限,现阶段有几种选择可以解决COVID-19疫苗消费国缺乏准入的问题。首先,美国最高法院可能会使每家制药公司的专利申请无效。其次,个人可以提起法律诉讼,旨在收回这些制药公司的垄断收入。如果不采取法律行动,并且世贸组织的妥协不足以解决发展中国家的COVID-19疫苗短缺问题,那么发达国家将向中国打开向整个发展中国家和新兴市场提供COVID-19疫苗的大门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: The GEJ seeks to publish original and innovative research, as well as novel analysis, relating to the global economy. While its main emphasis is economic, the GEJ is a multi-disciplinary journal. The GEJ''s contents mirror the diverse interests and approaches of scholars involved with the international dimensions of business, economics, finance, history, law, marketing, management, political science, and related areas. The GEJ also welcomes scholarly contributions from officials with government agencies, international agencies, and non-governmental organizations. One over-arching theme that unites IT&FA members and gives focus to this journal is the complex globalization process, involving flows of goods and services, money, people, and information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信