Securing the Future? IDentity and Security among Migrants, Policymakers, and Tech Developers

IF 0.5 Q3 SOCIAL ISSUES
K. Grünenberg, Anja Simonsen
{"title":"Securing the Future? IDentity and Security among Migrants, Policymakers, and Tech Developers","authors":"K. Grünenberg, Anja Simonsen","doi":"10.1387/pceic.23103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As an attempt to ensure national security, there has been an increased use of biometric technologies in recent years. These involve a wide range of technologically mediated practices which format and digitalize bodily attributes such as fingerprints, iris and face, for the registration and verification of the identity of individuals. While biometrics are used in a wide range of settings and assume an increasingly important regulating role in society, their use is particularly salient in the tracking of movements and identification of migrants. Building on multi-sited ethnographic fieldwork, this article seeks to explore the importance of- and desire for security and its entanglement with the production of identities among Somali migrants, European Union policy makers and tech developers. We are particularly interested in the various ways in which what we call biometric “IDentities” are negotiated, as borders have become ubiquitous and extend into the far corners of society. In the article, we argue that the relationship between security and biometric technologies is important for both Somali migrants, tech developers and policy makers albeit in very different ways. The practices emerging from such entanglements are all informed by contextual and sociocultural understandings and negotiations of security and identity along multiple lines. Additionally, we argue that security plays a prominent role despite these actors’ very different positions in the biometric border world.","PeriodicalId":41605,"journal":{"name":"Papeles del CEIC-International Journal on Collective Identity Research","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Papeles del CEIC-International Journal on Collective Identity Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1387/pceic.23103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As an attempt to ensure national security, there has been an increased use of biometric technologies in recent years. These involve a wide range of technologically mediated practices which format and digitalize bodily attributes such as fingerprints, iris and face, for the registration and verification of the identity of individuals. While biometrics are used in a wide range of settings and assume an increasingly important regulating role in society, their use is particularly salient in the tracking of movements and identification of migrants. Building on multi-sited ethnographic fieldwork, this article seeks to explore the importance of- and desire for security and its entanglement with the production of identities among Somali migrants, European Union policy makers and tech developers. We are particularly interested in the various ways in which what we call biometric “IDentities” are negotiated, as borders have become ubiquitous and extend into the far corners of society. In the article, we argue that the relationship between security and biometric technologies is important for both Somali migrants, tech developers and policy makers albeit in very different ways. The practices emerging from such entanglements are all informed by contextual and sociocultural understandings and negotiations of security and identity along multiple lines. Additionally, we argue that security plays a prominent role despite these actors’ very different positions in the biometric border world.
保护未来?移民、政策制定者和技术开发人员的身份和安全
为了确保国家安全,近年来生物识别技术的使用越来越多。这些涉及广泛的以技术为媒介的做法,对指纹、虹膜和面部等身体属性进行格式化和数字化,以登记和核实个人身份。虽然生物识别技术在各种环境中得到广泛使用,并在社会中发挥着越来越重要的调节作用,但它们在跟踪移徙者的行动和识别移徙者方面的应用尤其突出。本文以多地点的民族志田野调查为基础,试图探讨安全的重要性和对安全的渴望,以及它与索马里移民、欧盟政策制定者和技术开发人员的身份认同产生的关系。我们特别感兴趣的是,随着边界变得无处不在,并延伸到社会的遥远角落,我们所谓的生物识别“身份”的各种谈判方式。在本文中,我们认为安全和生物识别技术之间的关系对索马里移民、技术开发人员和政策制定者都很重要,尽管方式非常不同。从这种纠缠中产生的实践都是由上下文和社会文化的理解以及沿着多种路线对安全和身份的谈判所影响的。此外,我们认为,尽管这些参与者在生物识别边界领域的地位非常不同,但安全仍发挥着突出作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信