{"title":"Church-administrative activities of Mukachevo «quasi»-bishop Ivan Joseph Godermarsky by the documents of State Archives in Transcarpathian Region","authors":"Olexander Monych","doi":"10.26565/2227-6505-2021-33-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The administrative activities of the bishop-nominee Ivan Joseph Godermarsky (1706–1716) is quite fully covered in the domestic historical literature. However, due to the lack of sources from local State Archives in Transcarpathian region presented in these publications– the topic remains open for further, scrupulous research.\n\nThe aim of the research is to reconstruct church-administrative activities of Mukachevo «quasi»-bishop Ivan Joseph Godermarsky after discovery of the materials of the State Archives in Transcarpathian region.\n\nThe methodological basis of the study are the principles of heuristics, interdisciplinary and documentary analysis, historicism, objectivity and synthesis. The principle of heuristics makes it possible to introduce the discovered documents into the scientific circulation, thanks to which the constant knowledge about the activities of the «quasi»-bishop Godermarsky is significantly expanded. The interdisciplinary approach considerably enriches the narrow framework of the bishop's church-administrative service and offers a more objective description of the bishop's activities. The principle of historicism makes it possible to reproduce the chronology and certain aspects of the bishop's rule in the context of church-political relations in the region. The objectivity of the research is expressed in unbiased coverage of the bishop's activities. Scientific analysis and synthesis allow us to determine the place and role of the bishop-nominee in the history of the development of Mukachevo Greek-Catholic Eparchy in the first quarter of the 18th century.\n\nScientific novelty of the research. Today, more and more often, permanent knowledge about the formation and development of both Mukachevo Greek Catholic and Máramaros Orthodox Eparchies is updated with new documents and relevant research. The proposed research primarily introduces new sources into the scientific circulation, which significantly supplement the historical past of the ecclesiastical Transcarpathia with new data. Secondly, the research presents separate documents released from the field of view of the predecessors, the introduction of which to the scientific world today corrects permanent conclusions and allows to expand the thematic range of research related to the activities of Mukachevo and Máramaros Episcopates in the first half of the 18th century. The practical significance of the obtained results will contribute to a comprehensive study of both the ecclesiastical past of the Orthodox and Greek Catholic Churches in Transcarpathia in the 18th century, as well as a comprehensive study of the ecclesiastical history of Ukraine in general.\n\nConclusions. The activities of the «quasi»-bishop Ivan Joseph Godermarsky vividly demonstrate another «black day» in the post-Union development of Mukachevo Greek Catholic Eparchy. During his reign, the bishop-nominee, due to personal ambitions, brought more problems to the eparchy than benefits that would contribute to the formation of an ecclesiastical unit. At the same time, his church-administrative activity contributed to the spread of the union in the eparchy and the jurisdictional incorporation of the Orthodox parishes of Ugochansky and Máramaros counties.","PeriodicalId":12328,"journal":{"name":"Februar 33","volume":"151 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Februar 33","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-6505-2021-33-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The administrative activities of the bishop-nominee Ivan Joseph Godermarsky (1706–1716) is quite fully covered in the domestic historical literature. However, due to the lack of sources from local State Archives in Transcarpathian region presented in these publications– the topic remains open for further, scrupulous research.
The aim of the research is to reconstruct church-administrative activities of Mukachevo «quasi»-bishop Ivan Joseph Godermarsky after discovery of the materials of the State Archives in Transcarpathian region.
The methodological basis of the study are the principles of heuristics, interdisciplinary and documentary analysis, historicism, objectivity and synthesis. The principle of heuristics makes it possible to introduce the discovered documents into the scientific circulation, thanks to which the constant knowledge about the activities of the «quasi»-bishop Godermarsky is significantly expanded. The interdisciplinary approach considerably enriches the narrow framework of the bishop's church-administrative service and offers a more objective description of the bishop's activities. The principle of historicism makes it possible to reproduce the chronology and certain aspects of the bishop's rule in the context of church-political relations in the region. The objectivity of the research is expressed in unbiased coverage of the bishop's activities. Scientific analysis and synthesis allow us to determine the place and role of the bishop-nominee in the history of the development of Mukachevo Greek-Catholic Eparchy in the first quarter of the 18th century.
Scientific novelty of the research. Today, more and more often, permanent knowledge about the formation and development of both Mukachevo Greek Catholic and Máramaros Orthodox Eparchies is updated with new documents and relevant research. The proposed research primarily introduces new sources into the scientific circulation, which significantly supplement the historical past of the ecclesiastical Transcarpathia with new data. Secondly, the research presents separate documents released from the field of view of the predecessors, the introduction of which to the scientific world today corrects permanent conclusions and allows to expand the thematic range of research related to the activities of Mukachevo and Máramaros Episcopates in the first half of the 18th century. The practical significance of the obtained results will contribute to a comprehensive study of both the ecclesiastical past of the Orthodox and Greek Catholic Churches in Transcarpathia in the 18th century, as well as a comprehensive study of the ecclesiastical history of Ukraine in general.
Conclusions. The activities of the «quasi»-bishop Ivan Joseph Godermarsky vividly demonstrate another «black day» in the post-Union development of Mukachevo Greek Catholic Eparchy. During his reign, the bishop-nominee, due to personal ambitions, brought more problems to the eparchy than benefits that would contribute to the formation of an ecclesiastical unit. At the same time, his church-administrative activity contributed to the spread of the union in the eparchy and the jurisdictional incorporation of the Orthodox parishes of Ugochansky and Máramaros counties.
国内历史文献对主教提名人葛德玛斯基(Ivan Joseph Godermarsky, 1706-1716)的行政活动进行了较为全面的论述。然而,由于这些出版物中缺乏来自跨喀尔巴阡地区当地国家档案馆的资料,该主题仍有待进一步细致的研究。研究的目的是重建穆卡切沃“准”主教伊万·约瑟夫·哥德马斯基在发现喀尔巴阡山脉地区国家档案馆的资料后的教会行政活动。本研究的方法论基础是启发式原则、跨学科和文献分析原则、历史主义原则、客观性原则和综合原则。启发式原理使得将发现的文件引入科学流通成为可能,由于这一点,关于“准”主教哥德马斯基活动的持续知识得到了显着扩展。跨学科的方法大大丰富了主教的教会管理服务的狭隘框架,并提供了一个更客观的描述主教的活动。历史决定论的原则使得在该地区教会与政治关系的背景下再现主教统治的年表和某些方面成为可能。研究的客观性体现在对主教活动的公正报道中。科学的分析和综合使我们能够确定主教提名人在18世纪前25年穆卡切沃希腊天主教教区发展史上的地位和作用。科学研究的新颖性。今天,关于穆卡切沃希腊天主教和Máramaros东正教教区的形成和发展的永久知识越来越多地被新的文件和相关研究所更新。本研究主要为科学界提供了新的资料来源,为教会在喀尔巴阡山脉的历史研究提供了新的资料。其次,该研究提供了前人观点领域中发布的单独文件,将其引入今天的科学界纠正了永久性结论,并允许扩大与18世纪上半叶穆卡切沃和Máramaros主教活动相关的研究主题范围。所得结果的实际意义将有助于全面研究18世纪外喀尔巴阡山脉东正教和希腊天主教会的教会历史,以及全面研究乌克兰的一般教会历史。“准”主教Ivan Joseph Godermarsky的活动生动地展示了穆卡切沃希腊天主教教区后联盟发展的另一个“黑色日子”。在他的统治期间,由于个人野心,主教提名人给教区带来的问题比有助于形成教会单位的利益更多。与此同时,他的教会管理活动促进了教区联盟的传播,并将乌戈昌斯基县和Máramaros县的东正教教区纳入管辖范围。