Shortchanged in Retirement: Continuing Challenges to Women's Financial Future

Jennifer Brown, Nari Rhee, Joelle Saad-Lessler, D. Oakley
{"title":"Shortchanged in Retirement: Continuing Challenges to Women's Financial Future","authors":"Jennifer Brown, Nari Rhee, Joelle Saad-Lessler, D. Oakley","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2779813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This new analysis finds that women are far more likely than men to face financial hardship in retirement. Women are 80 percent more likely than men to be impoverished at age 65 and older.Shortchanged in Retirement, The Continuing Challenges to Women’s Financial Future, finds that across all age groups, women have substantially less income in retirement than men.For women age 65 and older, the data indicate that their typical income is 25 percent lower than men. As men and women age, men’s income advantage widens to 44 percent by age 80 and older. Consequently, women were 80 percent more likely than men to be impoverished at age 65 and older, while women age 75 to 79 were three times more likely to fall below the poverty level as compared to their males counterparts. The report also finds that in 2010, men received $17,856 in median retirement income from a pension, whereas women received $12,000 — or 33 percent less.There is also a gender gap in defined contribution or 401(k)-type retirement account assets. In 2014, the median amount accumulated in these savings accounts was $36,875 for men and $24,446 for women — or 34 percent less, according to Vanguard.The key findings of this report are as follows:1. Women are 80 percent more likely than men to be impoverished at age 65 and older, while women between the ages of 75 to 79 are three times more likely than men to be living in poverty. Widowed women are twice as likely to be living in poverty than their male counterparts. White and black women are almost twice as likely to be living in poverty than their male counterparts during retirement.2. Labor force participation among women aged 55 to 64 climbed from 53 percent in 2000, to 59 percent in 2015, with a peak of 61 percent in 2010. Women may be working longer in order to make up for lower retirement savings over their careers and to offset investment losses from the Great Recession.3. While women were somewhat more likely than men to work for employers that offered retirement plans in 2012, there is a gap in eligibility that limits women’s participation in these plans. Since 2006, this gap has narrowed and now women and men have the same overall participation rates. Women’s higher rates of part-time employment and shorter job tenure may make it more difficult to meet employers’ eligibility requirements for retirement plans compared to men.4. The share of women working for employers that offered only defined contribution (DC) retirement plans shrank from 49 percent in 2009 to 46 percent in 2012. The median value in women’s DC retirement accounts was one-third less than that of men.5. Even though the median household incomes of individuals aged 65 and older has increased, women have 26 percent less income than men. While both women and men have decreased their reliance on Social Security since 2009, the proportion of income from defined benefit (DB) pensions has remained steady, supplying about one-fifth of income for both women and men. Older men and women have increased their reliance upon earnings since 2009.6. Social Security is an important source of income for older households with incomes less than $80,000. Women who are widowed, divorced, and over age 70 rely on Social Security benefits for a majority of their income. Black women rely largely on Social Security, while women of other ethnic groups also rely on wages to a large extent.7. Women in the health care, education, and public administration fields, where DB pension plans are more prevalent, have higher incomes in retirement and lower rates of poverty than in other industries, due to their increased participation in DB pension plans.In addition to spotlighting the gender disparities, the report details public policy options that can help that reduce women’s vulnerability to financial hardship as they age. These proposals to strengthen retirement security for women include:Strengthening Social Security benefits for women.Increasing retirement plan coverage through auto enrollment in individual retirement accounts (auto-IRA).Expanding utilization of the Saver’s Credit. Increased development of state-sponsored savings plans.Increasing defined contribution plan eligibility for part-time workers.Providing spousal protections in defined contribution accounts.Expanding defined benefit pension plans.This report is based on the authors’ analysis of the 2012 Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) data from the United States Census. It examines the distinct challenges posed by the current retirement system of Social Security, pensions, and savings for working-age women, retirement-aged women, and retired women. A grant from BNY Mellon Investment helped make this report possible.","PeriodicalId":76903,"journal":{"name":"Employee benefits journal","volume":"140 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee benefits journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2779813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

This new analysis finds that women are far more likely than men to face financial hardship in retirement. Women are 80 percent more likely than men to be impoverished at age 65 and older.Shortchanged in Retirement, The Continuing Challenges to Women’s Financial Future, finds that across all age groups, women have substantially less income in retirement than men.For women age 65 and older, the data indicate that their typical income is 25 percent lower than men. As men and women age, men’s income advantage widens to 44 percent by age 80 and older. Consequently, women were 80 percent more likely than men to be impoverished at age 65 and older, while women age 75 to 79 were three times more likely to fall below the poverty level as compared to their males counterparts. The report also finds that in 2010, men received $17,856 in median retirement income from a pension, whereas women received $12,000 — or 33 percent less.There is also a gender gap in defined contribution or 401(k)-type retirement account assets. In 2014, the median amount accumulated in these savings accounts was $36,875 for men and $24,446 for women — or 34 percent less, according to Vanguard.The key findings of this report are as follows:1. Women are 80 percent more likely than men to be impoverished at age 65 and older, while women between the ages of 75 to 79 are three times more likely than men to be living in poverty. Widowed women are twice as likely to be living in poverty than their male counterparts. White and black women are almost twice as likely to be living in poverty than their male counterparts during retirement.2. Labor force participation among women aged 55 to 64 climbed from 53 percent in 2000, to 59 percent in 2015, with a peak of 61 percent in 2010. Women may be working longer in order to make up for lower retirement savings over their careers and to offset investment losses from the Great Recession.3. While women were somewhat more likely than men to work for employers that offered retirement plans in 2012, there is a gap in eligibility that limits women’s participation in these plans. Since 2006, this gap has narrowed and now women and men have the same overall participation rates. Women’s higher rates of part-time employment and shorter job tenure may make it more difficult to meet employers’ eligibility requirements for retirement plans compared to men.4. The share of women working for employers that offered only defined contribution (DC) retirement plans shrank from 49 percent in 2009 to 46 percent in 2012. The median value in women’s DC retirement accounts was one-third less than that of men.5. Even though the median household incomes of individuals aged 65 and older has increased, women have 26 percent less income than men. While both women and men have decreased their reliance on Social Security since 2009, the proportion of income from defined benefit (DB) pensions has remained steady, supplying about one-fifth of income for both women and men. Older men and women have increased their reliance upon earnings since 2009.6. Social Security is an important source of income for older households with incomes less than $80,000. Women who are widowed, divorced, and over age 70 rely on Social Security benefits for a majority of their income. Black women rely largely on Social Security, while women of other ethnic groups also rely on wages to a large extent.7. Women in the health care, education, and public administration fields, where DB pension plans are more prevalent, have higher incomes in retirement and lower rates of poverty than in other industries, due to their increased participation in DB pension plans.In addition to spotlighting the gender disparities, the report details public policy options that can help that reduce women’s vulnerability to financial hardship as they age. These proposals to strengthen retirement security for women include:Strengthening Social Security benefits for women.Increasing retirement plan coverage through auto enrollment in individual retirement accounts (auto-IRA).Expanding utilization of the Saver’s Credit. Increased development of state-sponsored savings plans.Increasing defined contribution plan eligibility for part-time workers.Providing spousal protections in defined contribution accounts.Expanding defined benefit pension plans.This report is based on the authors’ analysis of the 2012 Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) data from the United States Census. It examines the distinct challenges posed by the current retirement system of Social Security, pensions, and savings for working-age women, retirement-aged women, and retired women. A grant from BNY Mellon Investment helped make this report possible.
退休后的钱少了:对女性财务未来的持续挑战
这项新的分析发现,女性比男性更有可能在退休后面临经济困难。女性在65岁及以上陷入贫困的可能性比男性高80%。《退休后收入减少:女性财务未来面临的持续挑战》发现,在所有年龄组中,女性退休后的收入都明显低于男性。对于65岁及以上的女性,数据显示她们的典型收入比男性低25%。随着男女年龄的增长,男性的收入优势在80岁及以上时扩大到44%。因此,65岁及以上的女性陷入贫困的可能性比男性高80%,而75岁至79岁的女性陷入贫困水平的可能性是同龄男性的三倍。报告还发现,2010年,男性的退休收入中位数为17,856美元,而女性为12,000美元,比男性少33%。在固定缴款或401(k)类型的退休账户资产方面也存在性别差异。根据Vanguard的数据,2014年,这些储蓄账户的中位数为男性36875美元,女性24446美元,比男性少34%。本报告的主要结论如下:65岁及以上的女性陷入贫困的可能性比男性高80%,而75岁至79岁的女性陷入贫困的可能性是男性的三倍。丧偶妇女生活在贫困中的可能性是男性的两倍。白人和黑人女性在退休后生活在贫困中的可能性几乎是男性的两倍。55岁至64岁女性的劳动参与率从2000年的53%上升到2015年的59%,2010年达到61%的峰值。女性延长工作时间可能是为了弥补职业生涯中较低的退休储蓄,并抵消大衰退带来的投资损失。虽然在2012年,女性比男性更有可能为提供退休计划的雇主工作,但在资格方面存在差距,限制了女性参与这些计划。自2006年以来,这一差距已经缩小,现在女性和男性的总体参与率相同。3 .与男性相比,女性较高的非全日制就业率和较短的工作任期可能使她们更难达到雇主对退休计划的资格要求。为只提供固定缴款退休计划的雇主工作的女性比例从2009年的49%下降到2012年的46%。女性DC退休账户的中位数比男性少三分之一。尽管65岁及以上老年人的家庭收入中位数有所增加,但女性的收入却比男性少26%。虽然自2009年以来,女性和男性都减少了对社会保障的依赖,但固定收益养老金(DB)的收入比例保持稳定,约占女性和男性收入的五分之一。自2009年以来,老年男性和女性对收入的依赖程度有所提高。对于收入低于8万美元的老年家庭来说,社会保障是一项重要的收入来源。丧偶、离婚和70岁以上的女性的大部分收入都依赖社会保障福利。黑人妇女在很大程度上依赖社会保障,而其他种族的妇女在很大程度上也依赖工资。医疗保健、教育和公共行政领域的妇女,在这些领域的养老金计划更为普遍,由于她们更多地参加了养老金计划,她们的退休收入比其他行业的妇女高,贫困率比其他行业的妇女低。除了强调性别差异外,报告还详细介绍了有助于减少妇女随着年龄增长而面临经济困难的公共政策选择。这些加强妇女退休保障的建议包括:加强妇女社会保障福利。通过自动注册个人退休账户(auto- ira)增加退休计划的覆盖范围。扩大储蓄者信贷的使用。加强发展国家支持的储蓄计划。增加兼职工人的固定缴款计划资格。在固定供款账户中提供配偶保障。扩大固定收益养老金计划。本报告基于作者对2012年美国人口普查收入和计划参与调查(SIPP)数据的分析。它考察了当前的社会保障、养老金和储蓄制度对工作年龄妇女、退休年龄妇女和退休妇女构成的独特挑战。纽约梅隆投资公司(BNY Mellon Investment)的一笔赠款帮助撰写了这份报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信