Why Figures with Error Bars Should Replace p Values Some Conceptual Arguments and Empirical Demonstrations

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
F. Fidler, G. Loftus
{"title":"Why Figures with Error Bars Should Replace p Values Some Conceptual Arguments and Empirical Demonstrations","authors":"F. Fidler, G. Loftus","doi":"10.1027/0044-3409.217.1.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Null-hypothesis significance testing (NHST) is the primary means by which data are analyzed and conclusions made, partic- ularly in the social sciences, but in other sciences as well (notably ecology and economics). Despite this supremacy however, numerous problems exist with NHST as a means of interpreting and understanding data. These problems have been articulated by various observers over the years, but are being taken seriously by researchers only slowly, if at all, as evidenced by the continuing emphasis on NHST in statistics classes, statistics textbooks, editorial policies and, of course, the day-to-day practices reported in empirical articles themselves (Cumming et al., 2007). Over the past several decades, observers have suggested a simpler approach - plotting the data with appropriate confidence intervals (CIs) around relevant sample statistics - to supplement or take the place of hypothesis testing. This article addresses these issues.","PeriodicalId":47289,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology","volume":"36 1","pages":"27-37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"71","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.217.1.27","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 71

Abstract

Null-hypothesis significance testing (NHST) is the primary means by which data are analyzed and conclusions made, partic- ularly in the social sciences, but in other sciences as well (notably ecology and economics). Despite this supremacy however, numerous problems exist with NHST as a means of interpreting and understanding data. These problems have been articulated by various observers over the years, but are being taken seriously by researchers only slowly, if at all, as evidenced by the continuing emphasis on NHST in statistics classes, statistics textbooks, editorial policies and, of course, the day-to-day practices reported in empirical articles themselves (Cumming et al., 2007). Over the past several decades, observers have suggested a simpler approach - plotting the data with appropriate confidence intervals (CIs) around relevant sample statistics - to supplement or take the place of hypothesis testing. This article addresses these issues.
在一些概念论证和实证论证中,为什么带误差条的图形应该取代p值
零假设显著性检验(NHST)是分析数据和得出结论的主要手段,特别是在社会科学中,但在其他科学(特别是生态学和经济学)中也是如此。然而,尽管具有这种优势,NHST作为解释和理解数据的手段存在许多问题。这些问题多年来已经被不同的观察者所阐述,但研究人员只是慢慢地认真对待,如果有的话,正如在统计课程,统计教科书,编辑政策以及实证文章本身报道的日常实践中对NHST的持续强调所证明的那样(Cumming等人,2007)。在过去的几十年里,观察人士提出了一种更简单的方法——在相关样本统计数据周围用适当的置信区间(ci)绘制数据——来补充或取代假设检验。本文将讨论这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology
Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信