2016 Trademark Year in Review

IF 1 3区社会学 Q2 LAW

Notre Dame Law Review Pub Date : 2017-07-25 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2886627

Mark Mckenna, S. Niemann

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This brief essay reviews some of the most significant developments in trademark law during the past year. In most cases we have interpreted “year” fairly liberally, particularly to highlight some longer-term trends. We focus on six areas: (1) the constitutionality of § 2(a) of the Lanham Act; (2) the Fourth Circuit’s Belmora decision and the availability of § 43(a) claims when the plaintiff has not used a mark in the United States; (3) the effect of BB (4) injunctive relief and the presumption of irreparable harm; (5) nominative fair use; and (6) initial interest confusion.

查看原文本刊更多论文

2016商标年复审

这篇简短的文章回顾了过去一年商标法的一些最重要的发展。在大多数情况下，我们对“年”的解释相当宽松，特别是为了突出一些长期趋势。我们关注六个方面:(1)《兰哈姆法》第2(a)条的合宪性;(2)第四巡回法院对贝尔莫拉案的判决，以及原告未在美国使用商标时第43(a)条索赔的可得性;(3)禁止令救济的效果和不可弥补损害的推定;(五)指定的合理使用;(6)初始利益混淆。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Notre Dame Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： In 1925, a group of eager and idealistic students founded the Notre Dame Lawyer. Its name was changed in 1982 to the Notre Dame Law Review, but all generations have remained committed to the original founders’ vision of a law review “synonymous with respect for law, and jealous of any unjust attacks upon it.” Today, the Law Review maintains its tradition of excellence, and its membership includes some of the most able and distinguished judges, professors, and practitioners in the country. Entirely student edited, the Law Review offers its members an invaluable occasion for training in precise analysis of legal problems and in clear and cogent presentation of legal issues.