Corporate Sustainability Assessment and Risk Perception: Empirical Evidences from Standard & Poor’s Index

Mauro Sciarelli, C. Landi, Lorenzo Mario Tani
{"title":"Corporate Sustainability Assessment and Risk Perception: Empirical Evidences from Standard & Poor’s Index","authors":"Mauro Sciarelli, C. Landi, Lorenzo Mario Tani","doi":"10.30845/AIJCR.V9N1P2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over last years, responsibility and sustainability issues have become a corporate asset able to enhance firms’ market value and, at the same time, meeting stakeholders’ needs. The additional information in regards to corporate social and environmental commitment has been disclosed on listed markets, implying a lower asymmetry between investors and firms. As a consequence, investments uncertainty has been decreasing through this non financial information which has made investors’ capital allocation more responsible. This paper investigates the impact of corporate social responsibility and sustainability on investors’ risk perception according to Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) paradigm. We focused on a double risk measurement systematic and idiosyncratic developing an empirical study on 77 companies listed on Standard & Poor’s index and belonging to “Consumer Discretionary” industry cluster. Empirical findings highlight that an overall ESG assessment affects positively investors’ risk perception, although in some cases this effect is partially balanced by the single assessments Environmental, Social, and Governance.","PeriodicalId":91049,"journal":{"name":"American international journal of contemporary research","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American international journal of contemporary research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30845/AIJCR.V9N1P2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Over last years, responsibility and sustainability issues have become a corporate asset able to enhance firms’ market value and, at the same time, meeting stakeholders’ needs. The additional information in regards to corporate social and environmental commitment has been disclosed on listed markets, implying a lower asymmetry between investors and firms. As a consequence, investments uncertainty has been decreasing through this non financial information which has made investors’ capital allocation more responsible. This paper investigates the impact of corporate social responsibility and sustainability on investors’ risk perception according to Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) paradigm. We focused on a double risk measurement systematic and idiosyncratic developing an empirical study on 77 companies listed on Standard & Poor’s index and belonging to “Consumer Discretionary” industry cluster. Empirical findings highlight that an overall ESG assessment affects positively investors’ risk perception, although in some cases this effect is partially balanced by the single assessments Environmental, Social, and Governance.
企业可持续性评估与风险认知:来自标准普尔指数的实证证据
在过去的几年里,责任和可持续性问题已经成为一种企业资产,能够提高公司的市场价值,同时满足利益相关者的需求。有关企业社会和环境承诺的额外信息已在上市市场上披露,这意味着投资者与企业之间的不对称程度较低。因此,通过这些非财务信息降低了投资的不确定性,使投资者的资本配置更加负责任。本文基于环境、社会与治理(Environmental, social, and Governance, ESG)范式,研究了企业社会责任和可持续性对投资者风险感知的影响。本文对77家标准普尔指数成分股“非必需消费品”产业集群的企业进行了系统性和特质性的双风险度量实证研究。实证研究结果强调,整体ESG评估对投资者的风险感知有积极影响,尽管在某些情况下,这种影响被环境、社会和治理的单一评估部分抵消。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书