Ambulatory pulmonary vein isolation workflow using suture-mediated vascular closure devices: a prospective observational cohort study

D. Fabbricatore, N. Mileva, C. Valeriano, D. Buytaert, P. Paolisso, P. Geelen, T. D. De Potter
{"title":"Ambulatory pulmonary vein isolation workflow using suture-mediated vascular closure devices: a prospective observational cohort study","authors":"D. Fabbricatore, N. Mileva, C. Valeriano, D. Buytaert, P. Paolisso, P. Geelen, T. D. De Potter","doi":"10.1093/europace/euac053.099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Cardiovascular Abbott D. Fabbricatore is supported by a research grant from the CardioPaTh PhD Program\n \n \n \n Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is an increasingly performed procedure worldwide, presenting an attractive opportunity for performing it in a day care setting.[1] The main reason for delayed discharge are the potential vascular complications that may occur.[2–5] There is still a lack of knowledge considering the usage of vascular closure devices in the electrophysiological field.\n \n \n \n The aim of the study was to evaluate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a suture-mediated vascular closure device in ambulatory management after PVI.\n \n \n \n Prospective single-centre cohort study on 50 patients admitted for PVI from January 2020 to May 2021. At the end of the procedure, a suture-mediated vascular closure system was used for each vascular access. The feasibility of an ambulatory PVI strategy was assessed as the percentage of patients being able to be discharged the same day of the procedure. Outcomes were defined as acute rate of vascular device closure performance, postprocedural time to haemostasis, time to ambulation and time to discharge. Vascular complications, analysed on the total number of patients enrolled, were assessed during the 30-days follow-up.\n \n \n \n A total of 48/50 (96%) patients were discharged at the same day of the procedure. Haemostasis was reached within 1 minute after the deployment of the device in 30 patients (60%). During the post-operative stay, two patients had minor bleeding without necessity of intervention and one patient was kept in supine position until an ultrasound evaluation resulted negative. Mean and median time to be deemed suitable for discharge in the 48 patients who reached the primary endpoint were 4:55 (±00:54) and 4:48 (2:50-7:30) hours respectively. Mean and median time to discharge were 5:48 (± 1:03) and 5:51 (3:38-7:57) hours respectively. Patient satisfaction was queried and resulted excellent. No major vascular complications were observed during 30-days follow up. Minor complications occurred in 4 patients and were three minor superficial haematomas (<6 cm) and one transient access site related nerve injury.\n \n \n \n The use of a closure device for femoral venous accesses after PVI led to a safe discharge of patients within 6 hours from the intervention in 96% of the population. The ambulatory management described in the abstract could be useful for minimizing the overcrowding of healthcare facilities and reduce the post-operative recovery time and management. Additionally, patients were satisfied with the treatment received. Randomised trials are needed for further evaluate the efficacy of this approach.\n","PeriodicalId":11720,"journal":{"name":"EP Europace","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EP Europace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac053.099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Cardiovascular Abbott D. Fabbricatore is supported by a research grant from the CardioPaTh PhD Program Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is an increasingly performed procedure worldwide, presenting an attractive opportunity for performing it in a day care setting.[1] The main reason for delayed discharge are the potential vascular complications that may occur.[2–5] There is still a lack of knowledge considering the usage of vascular closure devices in the electrophysiological field. The aim of the study was to evaluate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a suture-mediated vascular closure device in ambulatory management after PVI. Prospective single-centre cohort study on 50 patients admitted for PVI from January 2020 to May 2021. At the end of the procedure, a suture-mediated vascular closure system was used for each vascular access. The feasibility of an ambulatory PVI strategy was assessed as the percentage of patients being able to be discharged the same day of the procedure. Outcomes were defined as acute rate of vascular device closure performance, postprocedural time to haemostasis, time to ambulation and time to discharge. Vascular complications, analysed on the total number of patients enrolled, were assessed during the 30-days follow-up. A total of 48/50 (96%) patients were discharged at the same day of the procedure. Haemostasis was reached within 1 minute after the deployment of the device in 30 patients (60%). During the post-operative stay, two patients had minor bleeding without necessity of intervention and one patient was kept in supine position until an ultrasound evaluation resulted negative. Mean and median time to be deemed suitable for discharge in the 48 patients who reached the primary endpoint were 4:55 (±00:54) and 4:48 (2:50-7:30) hours respectively. Mean and median time to discharge were 5:48 (± 1:03) and 5:51 (3:38-7:57) hours respectively. Patient satisfaction was queried and resulted excellent. No major vascular complications were observed during 30-days follow up. Minor complications occurred in 4 patients and were three minor superficial haematomas (<6 cm) and one transient access site related nerve injury. The use of a closure device for femoral venous accesses after PVI led to a safe discharge of patients within 6 hours from the intervention in 96% of the population. The ambulatory management described in the abstract could be useful for minimizing the overcrowding of healthcare facilities and reduce the post-operative recovery time and management. Additionally, patients were satisfied with the treatment received. Randomised trials are needed for further evaluate the efficacy of this approach.
使用缝线介导的血管关闭装置的动态肺静脉隔离工作流程:一项前瞻性观察队列研究
资金来源类型:私人资助和/或赞助。主要资金来源:心血管雅培D. Fabbricatore由CardioPaTh博士项目的研究经费支持肺静脉隔离(PVI)治疗心房颤动(AF)在世界范围内越来越多地实施,为在日托环境中实施提供了一个有吸引力的机会。[1]延迟出院的主要原因是可能发生的潜在血管并发症。[2-5]考虑到电生理领域血管闭合装置的使用,目前还缺乏相关知识。本研究的目的是评估缝线介导的血管闭合装置在PVI术后门诊治疗中的可行性、安全性和有效性。对2020年1月至2021年5月收治的50例PVI患者进行前瞻性单中心队列研究。在手术结束时,每个血管通路都使用缝合线介导的血管关闭系统。动态PVI策略的可行性评估为患者能够在手术当天出院的百分比。结果定义为血管装置关闭的急性率、术后止血时间、下床时间和出院时间。在30天的随访期间,对入组患者总数进行血管并发症分析。共有48/50例(96%)患者在手术当天出院。30例患者(60%)在装置部署后1分钟内达到止血。术后住院期间,2例患者出现少量出血,无需干预,1例患者保持仰卧位,直至超声检查结果为阴性。48例达到主要终点的患者认为适合出院的平均和中位时间分别为4:55(±00:54)和4:48(2:50-7:30)小时。平均和中位出院时间分别为5:48(±1:03)和5:51(3:38-7:57)小时。询问患者满意度,结果非常好。随访30天未见重大血管并发症。4例患者出现轻微并发症,其中3例为浅表血肿(<6 cm), 1例为短暂性通路相关神经损伤。在PVI后使用封闭装置进行股静脉通路,96%的患者在干预后6小时内安全出院。摘要中描述的门诊管理可用于最大限度地减少医疗设施的拥挤,减少术后恢复时间和管理。此外,患者对所接受的治疗感到满意。需要随机试验来进一步评估该方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信