Percent Body Fat Prediction from Body Mass Index and Waist Circumference: New Cross-validated Equations for Young Adults

P. Hart
{"title":"Percent Body Fat Prediction from Body Mass Index and Waist Circumference: New Cross-validated Equations for Young Adults","authors":"P. Hart","doi":"10.12691/ajmsm-7-5-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A simple prediction equation that accurately predicts an individual’s percent body fat (PBF) with easy to obtain inputs could benefit health and exercise science professionals. The purpose of this study was to develop and cross-validate a set of regression equations predicting PBF in young adults. Methods: A subset of N=684 participants from a national health survey between the ages of 18 and 24 years was used in this study. Criterion values of PBF (PBF.DXA) were obtained using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Predictor variables included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference (WC). The sample was split equally and randomly into training and validation samples. Two sets of equations were evaluated in the training sample, one set using BMI and the other using WC. Both sets were tested to determine if age was a useful predictor of PBF.DXA. Cross-validation of selected model coefficients using the validation sample was evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients, Bland and Altman limits of agreement (LOA) plots and Kappa statistics for obesity classification. Results: The selected models were both two-predictor equations: PBF.BMI2 = 10.47827 + BMI*0.98342 – 12.50670; R2 = .872 and PBF.WC2 = 2.51020 + WC*0.38914 – 13.34843; R2 = .866. Cross-validation correlation coefficients were large for both PBF.BMI2 (r = .91) and PBF.WC2 (r = .92) equations. LOA plots indicated small bias of -0.49 ± 7.5% and -0.25 ± 6.8% in PBF.BMI2 and PBF.WC2 analyses, respectively. Kappa coefficients for agreement between the two obesity classification methods were considered “substantial” for PBF.BMI2 (κ = .64) and PBF.WC2 (κ = .70) models. Conclusion: This study provides validation evidence supporting the use of BMI- and WC-based PBF prediction equations in young adult populations.","PeriodicalId":7579,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine","volume":"149 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/ajmsm-7-5-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A simple prediction equation that accurately predicts an individual’s percent body fat (PBF) with easy to obtain inputs could benefit health and exercise science professionals. The purpose of this study was to develop and cross-validate a set of regression equations predicting PBF in young adults. Methods: A subset of N=684 participants from a national health survey between the ages of 18 and 24 years was used in this study. Criterion values of PBF (PBF.DXA) were obtained using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Predictor variables included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference (WC). The sample was split equally and randomly into training and validation samples. Two sets of equations were evaluated in the training sample, one set using BMI and the other using WC. Both sets were tested to determine if age was a useful predictor of PBF.DXA. Cross-validation of selected model coefficients using the validation sample was evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients, Bland and Altman limits of agreement (LOA) plots and Kappa statistics for obesity classification. Results: The selected models were both two-predictor equations: PBF.BMI2 = 10.47827 + BMI*0.98342 – 12.50670; R2 = .872 and PBF.WC2 = 2.51020 + WC*0.38914 – 13.34843; R2 = .866. Cross-validation correlation coefficients were large for both PBF.BMI2 (r = .91) and PBF.WC2 (r = .92) equations. LOA plots indicated small bias of -0.49 ± 7.5% and -0.25 ± 6.8% in PBF.BMI2 and PBF.WC2 analyses, respectively. Kappa coefficients for agreement between the two obesity classification methods were considered “substantial” for PBF.BMI2 (κ = .64) and PBF.WC2 (κ = .70) models. Conclusion: This study provides validation evidence supporting the use of BMI- and WC-based PBF prediction equations in young adult populations.
从身体质量指数和腰围预测体脂百分比:年轻人新的交叉验证方程
背景:一个简单的预测方程,可以准确地预测一个人的体脂百分比(PBF),并且易于获得输入,这对健康和运动科学专业人员来说是有益的。本研究的目的是建立并交叉验证一组预测年轻人PBF的回归方程。方法:在本研究中使用了来自全国健康调查的N=684名年龄在18至24岁之间的参与者。采用双能x线吸收仪(DXA)测定PBF (PBF.DXA)的标准值。预测变量包括年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)和腰围(WC)。样本平均随机分为训练样本和验证样本。在训练样本中评估两组方程,一组使用BMI,另一组使用WC。两组都进行了测试,以确定年龄是否是PBF.DXA的有用预测因子。使用验证样本对选定模型系数进行交叉验证,使用Pearson相关系数、Bland和Altman一致限(LOA)图和Kappa统计量进行肥胖分类。结果:所选模型均为双预测方程:PBF。bmi 2 = 10.47827 + bmi *0.98342 - 12.50670;R2 = .872, PBF。Wc2 = 2.51020 + wc *0.38914 - 13.34843;R2 = 0.866。两种PBF的交叉验证相关系数均较大。BMI2 (r = .91)与PBF。WC2 (r = .92)方程。LOA图显示PBF偏差较小,分别为-0.49±7.5%和-0.25±6.8%。BMI2和PBF。分别进行WC2分析。两种肥胖分类方法之间的一致性Kappa系数被认为是PBF的“实质性”。BMI2 (κ = .64)与PBF。WC2 (κ = .70)模型。结论:本研究提供了验证性证据,支持在年轻成人人群中使用基于BMI和wc的PBF预测方程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信