The religious elephant in Heidegger’s phenomenological room

John J. S. Martis
{"title":"The religious elephant in Heidegger’s phenomenological room","authors":"John J. S. Martis","doi":"10.1177/1030570X17718581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his lectures on the Phenomenology of Religious Life (1920–21), Martin Heidegger offers a phenomenological reading of Paul’s Galatian and Thessalonian letters, seeing these as themselves proclaiming the phenomenological attitude. Curiously, however, Heidegger’s analysis of Thessalonian facticity appears to separate the factical status of Thessalonian ‘having-become’ from that of its faith content. This article sees that decision as itself displaying elements of theorization, and abandonment of the phenomenological aim of allowing experience to show itself out of itself. More, Heidegger’s approach misses an opportunity to notice the ‘in Christ’ as constitutive of a structural ‘incursion of an absolute other’ that sustains the phenomenological approach, saving it from falling into its theorizing other, the scientific worldview.","PeriodicalId":82256,"journal":{"name":"Pacifica : journal of the Melbourne College of Divinity","volume":"44 1","pages":"244 - 260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacifica : journal of the Melbourne College of Divinity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1030570X17718581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In his lectures on the Phenomenology of Religious Life (1920–21), Martin Heidegger offers a phenomenological reading of Paul’s Galatian and Thessalonian letters, seeing these as themselves proclaiming the phenomenological attitude. Curiously, however, Heidegger’s analysis of Thessalonian facticity appears to separate the factical status of Thessalonian ‘having-become’ from that of its faith content. This article sees that decision as itself displaying elements of theorization, and abandonment of the phenomenological aim of allowing experience to show itself out of itself. More, Heidegger’s approach misses an opportunity to notice the ‘in Christ’ as constitutive of a structural ‘incursion of an absolute other’ that sustains the phenomenological approach, saving it from falling into its theorizing other, the scientific worldview.
海德格尔现象学房间里的宗教大象
在他关于宗教生活现象学的讲座(1920-21)中,马丁·海德格尔对保罗的加拉太书和帖撒罗尼迦书进行了现象学解读,认为这些书本身就在宣扬现象学的态度。然而,奇怪的是,海德格尔对帖撒罗尼亚事实性的分析似乎将帖撒罗尼亚“已经成为”的政治地位与其信仰内容的政治地位分开了。这篇文章认为,这个决定本身显示了理论化的元素,并放弃了让经验从自身中表现出来的现象学目标。此外,海德格尔的方法错过了一个机会,没有注意到“在基督里”作为一种结构上的“绝对他者的入侵”的组成部分,这种入侵维持了现象学方法,使它免于陷入其理论化的他者,即科学世界观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书