The effect of different types of laparoscopic bariatric procedures on type 2 diabetic obese patients

M. Ahmed, Ahmed Mohamed Safy, Wael Nabil Abdel-slam, H. Hussein
{"title":"The effect of different types of laparoscopic bariatric procedures on type 2 diabetic obese patients","authors":"M. Ahmed, Ahmed Mohamed Safy, Wael Nabil Abdel-slam, H. Hussein","doi":"10.21608/svuijm.2022.114993.1263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The rising global incidence and prevalence of type II diabetes (T2DM) has paralleled the rise in obesity. Bariatric surgery is currently the most effective treatment for obesity compared to maximal medical and lifestyle management. Objectives: This work aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of LSG (group 1), (LRYGB) (group 2) and (MGB) (group 3) for T2DM obese patients. Patients and Methods: A randomized prospective clinical study for 225 patients with morbid obesity (BMI 35 kg/m 2 or more with T2DM) treated by laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG),laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass(LRYGB) and mini gastric bypass (MGB),(75 patients in each group) conducted in Qena and Alexandria university hospitals from March 2019 to September 2020.The primary outcome was complete remission of type 2 diabetes with hyperglycemia control, (HbA1c <6 %). The secondary outcome was weight loss is by calculating the percentage of excess weight loss (% EWL) Results: There was statistically significant difference between the three studied groups regarding time of surgery (96.5 ± 17.6, 107.3 ± 19.4, and 106.6 ± 15.8 among group 1, 2, and 3respectively; P-value < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the three studied groups regarding hospital staying duration and postoperative complication. There was no statistically significant difference between the three studied groups regarding HbA1C postoperative. Conclusion: Metabolic surgery has emerged as the single most effective treatment option for T2DM and obesity. There is a potential superiority of the LRYGB and MGB over the LSG in obtaining diabetes remission.","PeriodicalId":34789,"journal":{"name":"SVU International Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SVU International Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/svuijm.2022.114993.1263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The rising global incidence and prevalence of type II diabetes (T2DM) has paralleled the rise in obesity. Bariatric surgery is currently the most effective treatment for obesity compared to maximal medical and lifestyle management. Objectives: This work aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of LSG (group 1), (LRYGB) (group 2) and (MGB) (group 3) for T2DM obese patients. Patients and Methods: A randomized prospective clinical study for 225 patients with morbid obesity (BMI 35 kg/m 2 or more with T2DM) treated by laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG),laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass(LRYGB) and mini gastric bypass (MGB),(75 patients in each group) conducted in Qena and Alexandria university hospitals from March 2019 to September 2020.The primary outcome was complete remission of type 2 diabetes with hyperglycemia control, (HbA1c <6 %). The secondary outcome was weight loss is by calculating the percentage of excess weight loss (% EWL) Results: There was statistically significant difference between the three studied groups regarding time of surgery (96.5 ± 17.6, 107.3 ± 19.4, and 106.6 ± 15.8 among group 1, 2, and 3respectively; P-value < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the three studied groups regarding hospital staying duration and postoperative complication. There was no statistically significant difference between the three studied groups regarding HbA1C postoperative. Conclusion: Metabolic surgery has emerged as the single most effective treatment option for T2DM and obesity. There is a potential superiority of the LRYGB and MGB over the LSG in obtaining diabetes remission.
不同类型腹腔镜减肥手术对2型糖尿病肥胖患者的影响
背景:全球II型糖尿病(T2DM)发病率和患病率的上升与肥胖的上升是平行的。与最大的药物和生活方式管理相比,减肥手术是目前治疗肥胖最有效的方法。目的:本研究旨在比较LSG(1组)、LRYGB(2组)和MGB(3组)治疗T2DM肥胖患者的疗效和安全性。患者和方法:一项随机前瞻性临床研究,于2019年3月至2020年9月在Qena和Alexandria大学医院进行了225例经腹腔镜袖式胃切除术(LSG)、腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)和迷你胃旁路术(MGB)治疗的病态肥胖(BMI≥35 kg/ m2)患者(每组75例)。主要结局是2型糖尿病完全缓解并高血糖控制(HbA1c < 6%)。结果:三组患者手术时间(1、2、3组分别为96.5±17.6、107.3±19.4、106.6±15.8),差异均有统计学意义;p值< 0.05)。三个研究组在住院时间和术后并发症方面无统计学差异。三组术后HbA1C差异无统计学意义。结论:代谢手术已成为T2DM合并肥胖最有效的治疗选择。在获得糖尿病缓解方面,LRYGB和MGB比LSG有潜在的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信