An Ethical View on International Trade Agreements TTIP and CETA in the Republic of Croatia

Q4 Medicine
Jahr Pub Date : 2019-12-20 DOI:10.21860/j.10.2.6
M. Marinčić, B. Čović
{"title":"An Ethical View on International Trade Agreements TTIP and CETA in the Republic of Croatia","authors":"M. Marinčić, B. Čović","doi":"10.21860/j.10.2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The topic of TTIP and CETA was almost completely suppressed in Croatia.1 Those are very important international agreements which could have far-reaching consequences both for the world and individual countries. Maybe Croatia, as well as the EU, is not so much involved in the whole story concerning TTIP. However, CETA is an agreement signed by Canada with the European Union. Therefore, after the approval of the European Parliament, EU provisions, such as the customs policy, can immediately start to apply, which means abolishing duty rates for 99% of the products as early as 1 January 2017. The decision on the CETA conclusion on behalf of Croatia was initiated by the technical Government of Tihomir Orešković at its last session.2 The superficial interpretation of these certainly not harmless agreements is of too little interest to both philosophers and theologians in Croatia, and except for the Centre of Excellence for Integrative Bioethics’3 reaction concerning this question, other philosophical-theological discussions seem to be lacking. The impression is that philosophers and theologians feel these issues do not concern them. In this paper we will try to make clear that the above-mentioned international agreements concern both philosophers and theologians, and that they certainly should, from their field, from the theoretical level, engage in the discussion of the said agreements.","PeriodicalId":37490,"journal":{"name":"Jahr","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jahr","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21860/j.10.2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The topic of TTIP and CETA was almost completely suppressed in Croatia.1 Those are very important international agreements which could have far-reaching consequences both for the world and individual countries. Maybe Croatia, as well as the EU, is not so much involved in the whole story concerning TTIP. However, CETA is an agreement signed by Canada with the European Union. Therefore, after the approval of the European Parliament, EU provisions, such as the customs policy, can immediately start to apply, which means abolishing duty rates for 99% of the products as early as 1 January 2017. The decision on the CETA conclusion on behalf of Croatia was initiated by the technical Government of Tihomir Orešković at its last session.2 The superficial interpretation of these certainly not harmless agreements is of too little interest to both philosophers and theologians in Croatia, and except for the Centre of Excellence for Integrative Bioethics’3 reaction concerning this question, other philosophical-theological discussions seem to be lacking. The impression is that philosophers and theologians feel these issues do not concern them. In this paper we will try to make clear that the above-mentioned international agreements concern both philosophers and theologians, and that they certainly should, from their field, from the theoretical level, engage in the discussion of the said agreements.
克罗地亚共和国国际贸易协定TTIP和CETA的伦理观
TTIP和CETA的话题在克罗地亚几乎完全被压制。1这些都是非常重要的国际协定,可能对世界和个别国家产生深远的影响。也许克罗地亚和欧盟并没有那么多地参与到TTIP的整个故事中。然而,CETA是加拿大与欧盟签署的一项协议。因此,在欧洲议会批准后,欧盟的规定,如海关政策,可以立即开始适用,这意味着最早在2017年1月1日取消99%的产品的关税。代表克罗地亚缔结《全面经济贸易协定》的决定是由蒂霍米尔技术政府Orešković在上届会议上提出的克罗地亚的哲学家和神学家对这些当然不是无害的协议的肤浅解释都不感兴趣,除了综合生物伦理学卓越中心对这个问题的反应之外,其他的哲学-神学讨论似乎缺乏。给人的印象是,哲学家和神学家觉得这些问题与他们无关。在本文中,我们将试图阐明,上述国际协议涉及哲学家和神学家,他们当然应该从他们的领域,从理论层面,参与上述协议的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jahr
Jahr Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: JAHR – EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS is a journal that deals with a wide range of bioethical topics. The aim of the Editorial Board is to publish articles related to bioethics in social sciences (sociology, psychology, law, political science, information and communication sciences, pedagogy, education and rehabilitation sciences, speech-language pathology, kinesiology, demography, social activities, security and defence sciences, economics), humanities (philosophy, theology, philology, history, art history, archaeology, ethnology and anthropology, religious sciences), biomedical (medicine, public health, veterinary medicine, dentistry and pharmacology), but also in other sciences. The journal is published twice a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信