Placing a Hemodialysis Catheter in Patients With Multiple Access Failure and Exhausted Usual Approachable Veins: Egyptian Single Center Experience

Q3 Medicine
Moataz Fatthy, T. Abdelaziz, M. Marie, Mohamed Abdelkawi, Tamer Abdel Tawab
{"title":"Placing a Hemodialysis Catheter in Patients With Multiple Access Failure and Exhausted Usual Approachable Veins: Egyptian Single Center Experience","authors":"Moataz Fatthy, T. Abdelaziz, M. Marie, Mohamed Abdelkawi, Tamer Abdel Tawab","doi":"10.2309/JAVA-D-20-00029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a growing global health hazard. Most patients are maintained on dialysis rather than transplantation. Adequate vascular access for hemodialysis is crucial to achieve an optimal dialysis dose and to reduce morbidity and mortality. Patients with multiple access failure are in desperate need for lifesaving access, especially in the absence of alternatives (transplantation or peritoneal dialysis).Objective: Patients with multiple vascular access failure and exhausted approachable veins are being referred to an interventional nephrology or radiology centers. The aim of this work is to evaluate a single center’s experience of sophisticated venous approaches to provide access for hemodialysis.Methods: This study was performed at the Interventional Nephrology Center at Kasr Al-Ainy University Hospitals. Epidemiological data of patients, e.g., age, gender, as well as the number of previously cannulated central veins, were documented.Results: Data of 188 patients with multiple dialysis venous access failure (117 females and 71 males, aged 17–56 years) were collected. Successful innominate (brachiocephalic) venous cannulation was achieved in 149 patients (79%). Eighteen patients had successful external iliac venous approach (9%). Successful transhepatic venous approach was placed as permanent access in 7 patients (4%). The rest of the patients (n = 14, 7%) were referred to other centers due to failure.Conclusions: Sophisticated central venous approaches, mainly brachiocephalic, as described in this study, may play as alternatives for placing either temporary or tunneled hemodialysis catheters in patients with multiple vascular access failure and stenosed or thrombosed central veins.","PeriodicalId":35321,"journal":{"name":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","volume":"34 1","pages":"47-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2309/JAVA-D-20-00029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a growing global health hazard. Most patients are maintained on dialysis rather than transplantation. Adequate vascular access for hemodialysis is crucial to achieve an optimal dialysis dose and to reduce morbidity and mortality. Patients with multiple access failure are in desperate need for lifesaving access, especially in the absence of alternatives (transplantation or peritoneal dialysis).Objective: Patients with multiple vascular access failure and exhausted approachable veins are being referred to an interventional nephrology or radiology centers. The aim of this work is to evaluate a single center’s experience of sophisticated venous approaches to provide access for hemodialysis.Methods: This study was performed at the Interventional Nephrology Center at Kasr Al-Ainy University Hospitals. Epidemiological data of patients, e.g., age, gender, as well as the number of previously cannulated central veins, were documented.Results: Data of 188 patients with multiple dialysis venous access failure (117 females and 71 males, aged 17–56 years) were collected. Successful innominate (brachiocephalic) venous cannulation was achieved in 149 patients (79%). Eighteen patients had successful external iliac venous approach (9%). Successful transhepatic venous approach was placed as permanent access in 7 patients (4%). The rest of the patients (n = 14, 7%) were referred to other centers due to failure.Conclusions: Sophisticated central venous approaches, mainly brachiocephalic, as described in this study, may play as alternatives for placing either temporary or tunneled hemodialysis catheters in patients with multiple vascular access failure and stenosed or thrombosed central veins.
在多通道失败和通常可接近静脉衰竭的患者中放置血液透析导管:埃及单中心经验
背景:终末期肾病(ESRD)是一个日益严重的全球性健康危害。大多数病人靠透析而不是移植维持。充足的血液透析血管通道对于获得最佳透析剂量和降低发病率和死亡率至关重要。多通道失败的患者迫切需要挽救生命的通道,特别是在缺乏替代方案(移植或腹膜透析)的情况下。目的:多血管通路失败和可接近静脉衰竭的患者被转介到介入肾脏病学或放射学中心。这项工作的目的是评估一个中心的经验,复杂的静脉途径,以提供血液透析。方法:本研究在Kasr Al-Ainy大学附属医院介入肾脏病学中心进行。记录了患者的流行病学资料,如年龄、性别以及先前插管的中心静脉数量。结果:收集了188例多次透析静脉通路失败患者的资料,其中女性117例,男性71例,年龄17-56岁。149例(79%)患者成功进行无名(头臂)静脉插管。18例患者成功行髂外静脉入路(9%)。7例(4%)患者成功地将经肝静脉入路作为永久入路。其余患者(n = 14.7%)因治疗失败转介到其他中心。结论:如本研究所述,复杂的中心静脉入路,主要是头臂静脉入路,可以作为多血管通路失败和中心静脉狭窄或血栓形成的患者放置临时或隧道血液透析导管的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access
JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Association for Vascular Access (AVA) is an association of healthcare professionals founded in 1985 to promote the emerging vascular access specialty. Today, its multidisciplinary membership advances research, professional and public education to shape practice and enhance patient outcomes, and partners with the device manufacturing community to bring about evidence-based innovations in vascular access.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信