Behavior of Railway Embankment Constructed on Soft Deltaic Deposits under Varying Train Speeds

Shamontee Aziz, Joyashree Mallick, Iram Lamiya Hoque, Md. Arifuzzaman Nayeem, A. Amin
{"title":"Behavior of Railway Embankment Constructed on Soft Deltaic Deposits under Varying Train Speeds","authors":"Shamontee Aziz, Joyashree Mallick, Iram Lamiya Hoque, Md. Arifuzzaman Nayeem, A. Amin","doi":"10.4028/p-j7627z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study employs 2D finite element modeling using Plaxis to investigate the behavior of the railway embankment constructed on the active Ganges-Bramhaputra floodplain. The parametric study considers three different train speeds, 100, 120, and 170 km/hr, and two different soil profiles along different chainages, chainage 82 km+183 m (Ch1) and 84 km+102 m (Ch2) of Padma Bridge Rail Link. Pseudo-static trainloads have been applied and the settlement of the ballast bottom (BB) and embankment bottom (EB) have been determined and compared along with the factor of safety (FS). From the obtained results, the maximum settlement of EB in Ch1 ranged between 27.45 cm to 29.2 cm which is lower by 9.2 cm from Ch2 on average. For BB, greater settlements have been observed as they varied between 33.25 cm to 36.20 cm for Ch1 and 42.80 cm to 45.31 cm for Ch2. Thus in both cases, Ch2 shows greater settlements. Also in both chainages, the settlements exceed the allowable range. As the train speed increases from 100 to 170 km/hr, the increase in the settlement is noticeable for the ballast bottom but not for the embankment bottom. Considering the FS, the embankments are assessed to be safe in all considered cases with an FS> 1.2, without any significant effect of train speeds.","PeriodicalId":7271,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Materials Research","volume":"17 1","pages":"81 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Materials Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4028/p-j7627z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study employs 2D finite element modeling using Plaxis to investigate the behavior of the railway embankment constructed on the active Ganges-Bramhaputra floodplain. The parametric study considers three different train speeds, 100, 120, and 170 km/hr, and two different soil profiles along different chainages, chainage 82 km+183 m (Ch1) and 84 km+102 m (Ch2) of Padma Bridge Rail Link. Pseudo-static trainloads have been applied and the settlement of the ballast bottom (BB) and embankment bottom (EB) have been determined and compared along with the factor of safety (FS). From the obtained results, the maximum settlement of EB in Ch1 ranged between 27.45 cm to 29.2 cm which is lower by 9.2 cm from Ch2 on average. For BB, greater settlements have been observed as they varied between 33.25 cm to 36.20 cm for Ch1 and 42.80 cm to 45.31 cm for Ch2. Thus in both cases, Ch2 shows greater settlements. Also in both chainages, the settlements exceed the allowable range. As the train speed increases from 100 to 170 km/hr, the increase in the settlement is noticeable for the ballast bottom but not for the embankment bottom. Considering the FS, the embankments are assessed to be safe in all considered cases with an FS> 1.2, without any significant effect of train speeds.
软三角洲沉积物上铁路路堤在不同列车速度下的性能
本研究采用Plaxis的二维有限元模型来研究在活跃的恒河-布拉马普特拉河漫滩上建造的铁路路堤的行为。参数化研究考虑了三种不同的列车速度,分别为100、120和170 km/hr,以及沿Padma大桥铁路线82 km+183 m (Ch1)和84 km+102 m (Ch2)不同路段的两种不同土壤剖面。采用列车拟静力载荷,测定了路基底部和道砟底部的沉降量,并与安全系数进行了比较。结果表明,EB在Ch1中的最大沉降在27.45 ~ 29.2 cm之间,比Ch2平均低9.2 cm。对于BB, Ch1的沉降量在33.25 cm到36.20 cm之间,Ch2的沉降量在42.80 cm到45.31 cm之间。因此在这两种情况下,Ch2都表现出更大的沉降。而且在两个链中,沉降都超过了允许的范围。当列车速度从100 km/hr增加到170 km/hr时,道砟底部沉降增加明显,而路堤底部沉降增加不明显。考虑到FS,在所有考虑的FS> 1.2的情况下,路堤被评估为安全的,没有任何列车速度的显着影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信