Comparison of the postoperative analgesic effects of intrathecal Clonidine and Fentanyl as adjuvant: Mata Analysis of randomized control trials

Fantahun Tarekegn Kumie, A. Hailekiros, Setegn Eshetie
{"title":"Comparison of the postoperative analgesic effects of intrathecal Clonidine and Fentanyl as adjuvant: Mata Analysis of randomized control trials","authors":"Fantahun Tarekegn Kumie, A. Hailekiros, Setegn Eshetie","doi":"10.15406/JACCOA.2019.11.00411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background: Intrathecal clonidine and fentanyl added to bupivacaine prolongs the postoperative analgesic effects for below umbilicus surgery. However, the overall effect of clonidine and fentanyl mixed with spinal anesthesia is not harmonized. Therefore, the aim of this Meta - analysis was to assess the post operative analgesic effects of intrathecal clonidine and fentanyl for different randomized control trials of study.\nMethods: Pubmed, Cochrane Review, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched and a total of four studies have been selected for Meta – Analysis. Three authors engaged independently to extract data on the efficacy of intrathecal clonidine and fentanyl for lower abdomen and limb surgeries. The statistical analysis was accomplished by RevMan (version 5.3) software. The overall efficacy of intrathecal clonidine and fentanyl were pooled by Forrest plot, table, and figure with 95% confidence interval.\nResults: The pooled effect size mean difference of intrathecal clonidine versus fentanyl was 83.57(95 % CI, 29.33 to 137.82) minutes. Furthermore, the lowest and highest mean difference of effect size was 10.60 and 175.98 minutes respectively.\nConclusion: Intrathecal clonidine as adjuvant to bupivacaine gave the prolonged postoperative analgesia in comparison to intrathecal fentanyl. So it is recommended to use clonidine as intrathecal adjuvant when we consider the extended postoperative analgesia.","PeriodicalId":14916,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia & Critical Care: Open Access","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia & Critical Care: Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/JACCOA.2019.11.00411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Intrathecal clonidine and fentanyl added to bupivacaine prolongs the postoperative analgesic effects for below umbilicus surgery. However, the overall effect of clonidine and fentanyl mixed with spinal anesthesia is not harmonized. Therefore, the aim of this Meta - analysis was to assess the post operative analgesic effects of intrathecal clonidine and fentanyl for different randomized control trials of study. Methods: Pubmed, Cochrane Review, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched and a total of four studies have been selected for Meta – Analysis. Three authors engaged independently to extract data on the efficacy of intrathecal clonidine and fentanyl for lower abdomen and limb surgeries. The statistical analysis was accomplished by RevMan (version 5.3) software. The overall efficacy of intrathecal clonidine and fentanyl were pooled by Forrest plot, table, and figure with 95% confidence interval. Results: The pooled effect size mean difference of intrathecal clonidine versus fentanyl was 83.57(95 % CI, 29.33 to 137.82) minutes. Furthermore, the lowest and highest mean difference of effect size was 10.60 and 175.98 minutes respectively. Conclusion: Intrathecal clonidine as adjuvant to bupivacaine gave the prolonged postoperative analgesia in comparison to intrathecal fentanyl. So it is recommended to use clonidine as intrathecal adjuvant when we consider the extended postoperative analgesia.
鞘内注射氯定与芬太尼辅助术后镇痛效果的比较:随机对照试验的Mata分析
背景:布比卡因鞘内加用氯定和芬太尼可延长脐下手术术后镇痛效果。然而,氯定和芬太尼与脊髓麻醉混合的总体效果并不协调。因此,本荟萃分析的目的是在不同的随机对照试验中评估鞘内氯定和芬太尼的术后镇痛效果。方法:检索Pubmed、Cochrane Review、EMBASE和Google Scholar,共选择4项研究进行Meta分析。三位作者独立参与提取鞘内注射柯立定和芬太尼用于下腹和下肢手术的疗效数据。统计分析采用RevMan (version 5.3)软件完成。鞘内注射可乐定和芬太尼的总体疗效采用Forrest图、表和图合并,可信区间为95%。结果:鞘内可乐定与芬太尼的合并效应大小平均差为83.57分钟(95% CI, 29.33 ~ 137.82)。效应大小的平均差值最低为10.60 min,最高为175.98 min。结论:与芬太尼相比,鞘内注射可延长布比卡因的术后镇痛时间。因此,在考虑术后延长镇痛时,推荐使用可乐定作为鞘内辅助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书