Assessment of teacher competence within the context of their professional development: Analysis of international theory and practice

V. A. Prudnikova, L. Fishman, I. Fishman
{"title":"Assessment of teacher competence within the context of their professional development: Analysis of international theory and practice","authors":"V. A. Prudnikova, L. Fishman, I. Fishman","doi":"10.15293/2658-6762.2205.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The paper is concerned with the solution of an important research problem – the construction of a methodology for the development of procedures and tools for evaluating teachers within the framework of an independent assessment of their competencies based on the analysis of Russian and international theory and practice. The purpose of the article is to identify conceptual approaches and evaluation models widespread in the international theory and best practice of evaluating teacher performance which can be used in building a national system of independent evaluation of teacher professionalism. Materials and Methods. Competence and system-activity approaches became the methodological basis of the study. A comparative and problem analyses of the evolution of models for assessing teachers’ professionalism were implemented by means of general research methods of analysis, synthesis, comparison, generalization, systematization, and historical periodization. The sources included international publications from more than 30 countries, covering the period of the last 25 years. The sources were analyzed from the point of view of the expediency and possibility of using these approaches in building up a national system of independent assessment of teacher professionalism as a tool which would ensure both professional development of individual teachers and enhancing professional growth of educators all around the country. Results. The results of the analysis indicate the impossibility of direct transfer of international concepts and experience of teacher evaluation to the national system of independent assessment of teacher professionalism but allow the authors to make suggestions to the developers of the content and format of such inventories. Evaluation of proficiency in the subject taught may be deemed appropriate only at the theoretical part of the professional exam. Analysis of international models of teacher evaluation shows that Russian professional standards should be improved in terms of specifying labor functions and labor actions in such a way that they allow to fix clearly and unambiguously criteria that are understandable to all the stakeholders and can serve as a basis for independent assessment of professionalism as well as for identifying professional difficulties of teachers. It is important that identical assessment tools can be used to achieve the goals mentioned, but the ways of interpreting the assessment results should differ, since the same tools are designed in one case to carry out an administrative (summative) assessment, and in the other to serve the purposes of a formative assessment to compensate for the teacher's professional deficits. The developers should provide for the possibility of specifying criteria by clarifying the context of activities to consider the priorities of educational policy, regional specifics, and the specifics of educational institutions. Developers must also comply with the requirements for assessment tools, ensuring their ability to assess qualifications objectively, validly, and reliably for compliance with agreed criteria. The requirements of informing the objects about the evaluation objectives and procedure in advance, the need for special training of experts to conduct the evaluation procedure and summarize its results, and special measures aimed at ensuring the acceptance of the evaluation procedure by all the stakeholders are also relevant. Conclusions. Conclusions contain recommendations for the developers of the independent assessment procedure of teacher professionalism based on the findings of the analysis conducted.","PeriodicalId":21621,"journal":{"name":"Science for Education Today","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science for Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2205.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The paper is concerned with the solution of an important research problem – the construction of a methodology for the development of procedures and tools for evaluating teachers within the framework of an independent assessment of their competencies based on the analysis of Russian and international theory and practice. The purpose of the article is to identify conceptual approaches and evaluation models widespread in the international theory and best practice of evaluating teacher performance which can be used in building a national system of independent evaluation of teacher professionalism. Materials and Methods. Competence and system-activity approaches became the methodological basis of the study. A comparative and problem analyses of the evolution of models for assessing teachers’ professionalism were implemented by means of general research methods of analysis, synthesis, comparison, generalization, systematization, and historical periodization. The sources included international publications from more than 30 countries, covering the period of the last 25 years. The sources were analyzed from the point of view of the expediency and possibility of using these approaches in building up a national system of independent assessment of teacher professionalism as a tool which would ensure both professional development of individual teachers and enhancing professional growth of educators all around the country. Results. The results of the analysis indicate the impossibility of direct transfer of international concepts and experience of teacher evaluation to the national system of independent assessment of teacher professionalism but allow the authors to make suggestions to the developers of the content and format of such inventories. Evaluation of proficiency in the subject taught may be deemed appropriate only at the theoretical part of the professional exam. Analysis of international models of teacher evaluation shows that Russian professional standards should be improved in terms of specifying labor functions and labor actions in such a way that they allow to fix clearly and unambiguously criteria that are understandable to all the stakeholders and can serve as a basis for independent assessment of professionalism as well as for identifying professional difficulties of teachers. It is important that identical assessment tools can be used to achieve the goals mentioned, but the ways of interpreting the assessment results should differ, since the same tools are designed in one case to carry out an administrative (summative) assessment, and in the other to serve the purposes of a formative assessment to compensate for the teacher's professional deficits. The developers should provide for the possibility of specifying criteria by clarifying the context of activities to consider the priorities of educational policy, regional specifics, and the specifics of educational institutions. Developers must also comply with the requirements for assessment tools, ensuring their ability to assess qualifications objectively, validly, and reliably for compliance with agreed criteria. The requirements of informing the objects about the evaluation objectives and procedure in advance, the need for special training of experts to conduct the evaluation procedure and summarize its results, and special measures aimed at ensuring the acceptance of the evaluation procedure by all the stakeholders are also relevant. Conclusions. Conclusions contain recommendations for the developers of the independent assessment procedure of teacher professionalism based on the findings of the analysis conducted.
教师专业发展背景下的能力评估:国际理论与实践分析
介绍。本文关注的是解决一个重要的研究问题,即在分析俄罗斯和国际理论和实践的基础上,在独立评估教师能力的框架内,构建评估教师的程序和工具的方法。本文的目的是找出在国际上广泛存在的教师绩效评估理论和最佳实践中的概念方法和评估模型,这些方法和模型可用于构建国家教师专业精神独立评估体系。材料与方法。能力和系统活动方法成为本研究的方法论基础。运用分析、综合、比较、概括、系统化、历史分期等一般研究方法,对教师专业素养评价模式的演变进行了比较分析和问题分析。这些资料来源包括30多个国家的国际出版物,涵盖过去25年的期间。在此基础上,分析了运用这些方法建立教师专业素养独立评估体系的可行性和可行性,以确保教师个人的专业发展和促进全国教育工作者的专业成长。结果。分析结果表明,不可能将国际教师评价的概念和经验直接转移到国家教师专业精神独立评估体系中,但作者可以对此类清单的内容和格式的开发人员提出建议。只有在专业考试的理论部分才能对所教授科目的熟练程度进行评估。对国际教师评价模式的分析表明,俄罗斯的专业标准应在规定劳动职能和劳动行为方面加以改进,以便能够确定所有利益相关者都能理解的清晰、明确的标准,并可作为独立评估专业精神和识别教师专业困难的基础。重要的是,可以使用相同的评估工具来实现上述目标,但解释评估结果的方式应该有所不同,因为相同的工具在一种情况下被设计用于执行行政(总结性)评估,而在另一种情况下被设计用于形成性评估,以弥补教师的专业缺陷。发展商应考虑到教育政策的优先次序、区域的具体情况和教育机构的具体情况,阐明活动的背景,从而提供制订标准的可能性。开发人员还必须遵守评估工具的需求,确保他们能够客观、有效和可靠地评估符合商定标准的资格。提前告知评估对象评估目标和程序的要求,对专家进行评估程序和总结评估结果的特殊培训的需要,以及旨在确保所有利益相关者接受评估程序的特殊措施也是相关的。结论。结论包含了基于分析结果的对教师专业化独立评估程序开发者的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信