Comparison of the efficacy of active oxygen - containing mouthwash (BlueM) with chlorhexidine mouthwash (Hexidine) and its effect on plaque, calculus, and gingival inflammation

Chitrani Rajkhowa, Shiny Supriya L, J. Bhavadharani, Afreen Jannath A, Nivedha K, A. Padmanaban
{"title":"Comparison of the efficacy of active oxygen - containing mouthwash (BlueM) with chlorhexidine mouthwash (Hexidine) and its effect on plaque, calculus, and gingival inflammation","authors":"Chitrani Rajkhowa, Shiny Supriya L, J. Bhavadharani, Afreen Jannath A, Nivedha K, A. Padmanaban","doi":"10.18231/j.ijohd.2023.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": To compare the efficacy of active oxygen - containing mouthwash (BlueM) with chlorhexidine mouthwash (Hexidine) and its effect on plaque, calculus, and gingival inflammation.A Double blind parallel study was done on 20 systemically healthy patients with the presence of generalized chronic gingivitis in the age group of 20-45 years. Each subject will rinse their mouth with the mouthrinse assigned to them, or twice daily for one minute in the morning and before going to bed. They will be instructed to swish it properly around the mouth and avoid its ingestion. Descriptive statistics was performed by calculating mean and standard deviation for the continuous variables. Intergroup and intragroup comparisonbetween chlorhexidine and Blue M at baseline (To) and at the end of 3 weeks (T1) showing no statistical differences between the two groups.Blue M can be used as a safe alternative to chlorhexidine in reducing the microbial load. But when compared to each other there wasn't a significant change between them. Chlorhexidine has the edge in being very cheaper compared to Blue M. Further studies are required with conclusive evidence to be able to determine whether oxygen enriched mouthwashes can replace chlorhexidine in the future.","PeriodicalId":91704,"journal":{"name":"International journal of dentistry and oral health","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of dentistry and oral health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijohd.2023.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

: To compare the efficacy of active oxygen - containing mouthwash (BlueM) with chlorhexidine mouthwash (Hexidine) and its effect on plaque, calculus, and gingival inflammation.A Double blind parallel study was done on 20 systemically healthy patients with the presence of generalized chronic gingivitis in the age group of 20-45 years. Each subject will rinse their mouth with the mouthrinse assigned to them, or twice daily for one minute in the morning and before going to bed. They will be instructed to swish it properly around the mouth and avoid its ingestion. Descriptive statistics was performed by calculating mean and standard deviation for the continuous variables. Intergroup and intragroup comparisonbetween chlorhexidine and Blue M at baseline (To) and at the end of 3 weeks (T1) showing no statistical differences between the two groups.Blue M can be used as a safe alternative to chlorhexidine in reducing the microbial load. But when compared to each other there wasn't a significant change between them. Chlorhexidine has the edge in being very cheaper compared to Blue M. Further studies are required with conclusive evidence to be able to determine whether oxygen enriched mouthwashes can replace chlorhexidine in the future.
含氧漱口水(BlueM)与氯己定漱口水(Hexidine)的疗效比较及其对牙菌斑、牙石和牙龈炎症的影响
目的:比较含氧漱口水(BlueM)与氯己定漱口水(Hexidine)的疗效及其对牙菌斑、牙石和牙龈炎症的影响。对20例年龄在20-45岁的全身性慢性牙龈炎患者进行了双盲平行研究。每个受试者将用分配给他们的漱口水漱口,或每天两次,每次一分钟,在早上和睡觉前。他们将被指示在口中适当地漱口,避免误食。通过计算连续变量的均值和标准差进行描述性统计。氯己定和蓝M在基线(To)和3周末(T1)的组间和组内比较,两组间无统计学差异。蓝M可作为氯己定的安全替代品,减少微生物负荷。但是当它们相互比较时,它们之间并没有明显的变化。与Blue m相比,氯己定的优势是非常便宜,需要进一步的研究和确凿的证据来确定富氧漱口水是否可以在未来取代氯己定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信